On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 08:40:01PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
[...]
> Also, we don't have policies exclusively for lighttpd. Do you know how
> that fits in?
It's completely covered by sec-policy/selinux-apache. The httpd_t domain
works pretty well with lighttpd (running it here) and contains
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:15:14PM -0500, Chris Richards wrote:
> I'm torn on this, but basically I think we ought to track upstream here.
Which is... ? ;-)
As I said, there's no clear consensus from within upstream.
But I notice most people aim for a specific nginx module, so that's what
we'll