Re: [gentoo-hardened] bonding module auto-loading

2011-05-21 Thread Ed W
On 20/05/2011 12:11, "Tóth Attila" wrote: > After a week I think I've sorted out nearly all issues about openrc on my > systems. > Bonding was compiled into the kernel. Upon I tried to echo mode 4 > (802.3ad) to set up the lacp, the system said there's no write access to > the mode file. So the bon

Re: [gentoo-hardened] bonding module auto-loading

2011-05-21 Thread Ed W
Hi > Compiling it as a module is the way the devs recommend doing it. Which devs? Bond should support full configuration through sysfs for some years now? There is no reason that I'm aware of to need it to be a module? > I've > been compiling it into my kernels, but then I'm stuck with what I

Re: [gentoo-hardened] bonding module auto-loading

2011-05-21 Thread Tóth Attila
2011.Május 21.(Szo) 14:36 időpontban Ed W ezt írta: >> I want the round-robin, what's bothering me is the miimon >> which I can't change from 0 which means no mii mon which is not good. > > # cat /sys/class/net/bond0/bonding/miimon > 100 > # cat /sys/class/net/bond0/bonding/mode > 802.3ad 4 > > #

Re: [gentoo-hardened] bonding module auto-loading

2011-05-21 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 05/21/2011 08:36 AM, Ed W wrote: > Hi > >> Compiling it as a module is the way the devs recommend doing it. > > Which devs? > > Bond should support full configuration through sysfs for some years now? > There is no reason that I'm aware of to need it to be a module? > >> I've >> been compi