[gentoo-hardened] Towards stabilizing the latest SELinux policies/utilities.

2011-03-17 Thread Anthony G. Basile
This email is mostly for Swift and gizmo, but anyone can have their input. I've been running a SELinux system for the last month or so since I've uploaded the massive work done by Swift and gizmo. There was one major bug we noticed right away, and Swift got it, namely bugs #355745 and #356533 ---

Re: [gentoo-hardened] Towards stabilizing the latest SELinux policies/utilities.

2011-03-17 Thread Sven Vermeulen
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 01:14:02PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > I'm think we should go for stabilization --- I'm not sure how since the > arch teams are going to say they really can't test this for us, and as > they did with other packages, will probably defer the judgment back to > us. If we

Re: [gentoo-hardened] Towards stabilizing the latest SELinux policies/utilities.

2011-03-17 Thread Matthew Thode
I run no-multilib and can offer to test postgres standalone for you. But given that I run no-multilib I do not know if I can help until that bug is fixed. -- Matthew Thode On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 17:33, Sven Vermeulen wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 01:14:02PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote: >>