Re: [gentoo-hardened] Re: Remove the pic use flag in the hardened amd64 profile.

2011-03-02 Thread pageexec
On 1 Mar 2011 at 18:28, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > > in HVM mode > > i386 should be fine, amd64 should be dead slow. > > In my experience, both are fine. I run hardened x86, hardened amd64 and > hardened amd64 nomultilib as domU. The host is OpenSuse 11.3. I have > both KERNEXEC and UDEREF on,

Re: [gentoo-hardened] Re: Remove the pic use flag in the hardened amd64 profile.

2011-03-02 Thread Mike Edenfield
On 3/1/2011 6:22 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 03/01/2011 03:02 PM, pagee...@freemail.hu wrote: >> On 28 Feb 2011 at 15:39, Daniel Reidy wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 5:58 PM, wrote: that's actually not the intended use of the PIC USE flag, we wanted it originally to e

[gentoo-hardened] SELinux base policy 2.20101213-r9 in overlay

2011-03-02 Thread Sven Vermeulen
Hi guys, I've committed sec-policy/selinux-base-policy-2.20101213-r9 to the hardened-development overlay. It has the following fixes since -r8: - Allow Portage sandbox to ptrace (some package installs require this) - Use xserver_domtrans instead of allowing siginh (cleaner policy) - Fix issue that

[gentoo-hardened] Re: Re: Remove the pic use flag in the hardened amd64 profile.

2011-03-02 Thread Peter Hjalmarsson
ons 2011-03-02 klockan 10:28 +0200 skrev pagee...@freemail.hu: > On 1 Mar 2011 at 18:28, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > > > > in HVM mode > > > i386 should be fine, amd64 should be dead slow. > > > > In my experience, both are fine. I run hardened x86, hardened amd64 and > > hardened amd64 nomultili

[gentoo-hardened] SELinux FAQ & Handbook

2011-03-02 Thread Sven Vermeulen
Hi all Currently, the SELinux FAQ is integrated in the SELinux handbook as a dedicated chapter. I would like to suggest to separate the FAQ into its own guide rather than keep it integrated. The main reasons I see for this are - it makes more sense for users when they are told to look for the FA

Re: [gentoo-hardened] Re: Re: Remove the pic use flag in the hardened amd64 profile.

2011-03-02 Thread pageexec
On 2 Mar 2011 at 22:10, Peter Hjalmarsson wrote: > > > KVM is a different story, and I do see slowdown for amd64. > > > > this means that the slowdown is truly specific to some kvm/uderef > > interaction, > > not that i have an idea where to look still... > > Are you missing anything you need

Re: [gentoo-hardened] SELinux base policy 2.20101213-r9 in overlay

2011-03-02 Thread Aaron W. Swenson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 03/02/2011 12:48 PM, Sven Vermeulen wrote: > Hi guys, > > I've committed sec-policy/selinux-base-policy-2.20101213-r9 to the > hardened-development overlay. It has the following fixes since -r8: > - Allow Portage sandbox to ptrace (some package i

Re: [gentoo-hardened] Re: Remove the pic use flag in the hardened amd64 profile.

2011-03-02 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 03/02/2011 03:28 AM, pagee...@freemail.hu wrote: > On 1 Mar 2011 at 18:28, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > >>> in HVM mode >>> i386 should be fine, amd64 should be dead slow. >> >> In my experience, both are fine. I run hardened x86, hardened amd64 and >> hardened amd64 nomultilib as domU. The hos

Re: [gentoo-hardened] SELinux FAQ & Handbook

2011-03-02 Thread klondike
2011/3/2 Sven Vermeulen : > Hi all > > Currently, the SELinux FAQ is integrated in the SELinux handbook as a > dedicated chapter. I would like to suggest to separate the FAQ into its own > guide rather than keep it integrated. > > The main reasons I see for this are > > - it makes more sense for us