On 26 Dec 2010 at 1:59, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> I've got (at least) two servers that lose their root partition after
> this upgrade. One of them has an HP cciss SCSI RAID controller; the
> other has a single IDE hard drive. Assuming the problem is something
> common, I'll stick to describing the
On 12/26/2010 03:46 AM, pagee...@freemail.hu wrote:
> On 26 Dec 2010 at 1:59, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
>> I've got (at least) two servers that lose their root partition after
>> this upgrade. One of them has an HP cciss SCSI RAID controller; the
>> other has a single IDE hard drive. Assuming the
On 12/26/2010 03:46 AM, pagee...@freemail.hu wrote:
> On 26 Dec 2010 at 1:59, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
>> I've got (at least) two servers that lose their root partition after
>> this upgrade. One of them has an HP cciss SCSI RAID controller; the
>> other has a single IDE hard drive. Assuming the
On 12/26/2010 03:46 AM, pagee...@freemail.hu wrote:
> On 26 Dec 2010 at 1:59, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
>> I've got (at least) two servers that lose their root partition after
>> this upgrade. One of them has an HP cciss SCSI RAID controller; the
>> other has a single IDE hard drive. Assuming the
On 26 Dec 2010 at 12:06, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> I do have UDEREF enabled:
>
> # grep UDEREF .config
> CONFIG_PAX_MEMORY_UDEREF=y
>
> I can try disabling it when I'd be willing to drive to work and reboot
> the thing.
ok, in this case don't worry about it as i'm sure it's a known bug.
if
On 12/26/2010 12:57 PM, pagee...@freemail.hu wrote:
> On 26 Dec 2010 at 12:06, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
>> I do have UDEREF enabled:
>>
>> # grep UDEREF .config
>> CONFIG_PAX_MEMORY_UDEREF=y
>>
>> I can try disabling it when I'd be willing to drive to work and reboot
>> the thing.
>
> ok, in
On 12/26/2010 12:57 PM, pagee...@freemail.hu wrote:
> On 26 Dec 2010 at 12:06, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
>> I do have UDEREF enabled:
>>
>> # grep UDEREF .config
>> CONFIG_PAX_MEMORY_UDEREF=y
>>
>> I can try disabling it when I'd be willing to drive to work and reboot
>> the thing.
>
> ok, in
On 26 Dec 2010 at 14:09, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> Challenge accepted. I'm dressed, the car's cleaned off, and I'm
> recompiling with UDEREF=n.
passing pax_nouderef on the kernel cmdline should be enough ;)
On 26 Dec 2010 at 19:59, "Tóth Attila" wrote:
> I don't know if it is related or not. I don't use ext4 and have no
> symptoms of disappearing root. I attach a photo taken using a recent
> kernel. The latest crashes I've experienced for the past few months
> prevented syncing, so didn't get logged.
El 26/12/10 21:06, pagee...@freemail.hu escribió:
> On 26 Dec 2010 at 19:59, "Tóth Attila" wrote:
>
>> I don't know if it is related or not. I don't use ext4 and have no
>> symptoms of disappearing root. I attach a photo taken using a recent
>> kernel. The latest crashes I've experienced for the pa
El 26/12/10 21:00, pagee...@freemail.hu escribió:
> On 26 Dec 2010 at 14:09, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
>> Challenge accepted. I'm dressed, the car's cleaned off, and I'm
>> recompiling with UDEREF=n.
> passing pax_nouderef on the kernel cmdline should be enough ;)
This should be documented in the F
El 26/12/10 21:00, pagee...@freemail.hu escribió:
> On 26 Dec 2010 at 14:09, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
>> Challenge accepted. I'm dressed, the car's cleaned off, and I'm
>> recompiling with UDEREF=n.
> passing pax_nouderef on the kernel cmdline should be enough ;
looking at ./Documentation/kernel-p
12 matches
Mail list logo
