-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hey folks,
Has anyone else noticed that the entire hardened-sources package has
vanished from the hardened-development overlay? I know it's a
development overlay and all, but I figured I should mention it because
it's just gone. All versions. It stru
On 19/04/2010 17:53, Joseph C. Lininger wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hey folks,
Has anyone else noticed that the entire hardened-sources package has
vanished from the hardened-development overlay? I know it's a
development overlay and all, but I figured I should mention
On 19/04/2010 17:53, Joseph C. Lininger wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hey folks,
Has anyone else noticed that the entire hardened-sources package has
vanished from the hardened-development overlay? I know it's a
development overlay and all, but I figured I should mention
On 04/19/10 13:16, Ed W wrote:
I guess others will disagree, but I have never been a huge fan of the
kernel ebuilds. I'm just not clear what they buy you over downloading
and compiling your own? I think there are a few extra patches in the
case of gentoo-sources, but that seems to be about it?
On 4/19/2010 2:31 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 04/19/10 13:16, Ed W wrote:
>> I guess others will disagree, but I have never been a huge fan of the
>> kernel ebuilds. I'm just not clear what they buy you over downloading
>> and compiling your own? I think there are a few extra patches in the
>
On 19/04/10 20:31, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 04/19/10 13:16, Ed W wrote:
>> I guess others will disagree, but I have never been a huge fan of the
>> kernel ebuilds. I'm just not clear what they buy you over downloading
>> and compiling your own? I think there are a few extra patches in the
>> ca
Le lundi 19 avril 2010 19:46:57, Kerin Millar a écrit :
> They've been moved into anarchy's personal overlay:
>
> http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=dev/anarchy.git;a=commit;h=a4802d1
> 087c90a1371c15de195282c4601428dbe
I really do NOT understand this move.
We had a centralized place where
On 19/04/2010 20:45, David Sommerseth wrote:
[snip]
Yes, you are right. But still ... it's now closer to one year *without*
any updates for the stable kernel. Which means, compiling the latest
upstream 2.6.33.2 kernel might be a lot safer, than the 2.6.28-r9 which
is marked stable now.
As a
On 19/04/2010 21:12, Guillaume Castagnino wrote:
Le lundi 19 avril 2010 19:46:57, Kerin Millar a écrit :
They've been moved into anarchy's personal overlay:
http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=dev/anarchy.git;a=commit;h=a4802d1
087c90a1371c15de195282c4601428dbe
I really do NOT u
On 19/04/2010 20:37, Mike Edenfield wrote:
* The ebuilds for e.g. hardened-sources do all the patching for you,
which is nice.
And since hardened-sources is three *different* patchsets put together,
this one alone is plenty reason for me :)
OK, I'll bite I don't have an old
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Joseph C. Lininger wrote:
> Hey folks,
> Has anyone else noticed that the entire hardened-sources package has
> vanished from the hardened-development overlay? I know it's a
> development overlay and all, but I figured I should mention it because
> it's just gone.
I realise everyone has different needs, but perhaps try pulling your own
kernel down and applying your own patches - I think it's about easier to
maintain in most cases?
* The ebuilds for e.g. hardened-sources do all the patching for you,
which is nice.
Hmm, it's a very weak one, but yes o
On 20/04/2010 00:05, Mansour Moufid wrote:
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Joseph C. Lininger wrote:
Hey folks,
Has anyone else noticed that the entire hardened-sources package has
vanished from the hardened-development overlay? I know it's a
development overlay and all, but I figured I s
2010/4/20 Mansour Moufid :
In any case, it's clear to me now that Gentoo Hardened is more a pet
project of a handful of (not very communicative) developers than it is
a serious (meta)distribution.
I have serious doubts on what you say because I have seen those developers
working.
signature.asc
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Ed W wrote:
> Can we please avoid annoying the few developers we have working on hardened.
I didn't mean to come off as critiquing anyone. I am a fan of the
Gentoo Hardened and Security projects. I was only stating my
impressions.
> I would also disagree that the
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 01:35 +0200, klondike wrote:
> 2010/4/20 Mansour Moufid :
> > In any case, it's clear to me now that Gentoo Hardened is more a pet
> > project of a handful of (not very communicative) developers than it is
> > a serious (meta)distribution.
> I have serious doubts on what you s
Thanks for all the dedicated developers working on the hardened project.
Dw.
--
dr Tóth Attila, Radiológus, 06-20-825-8057, 06-30-5962-962
Attila Toth MD, Radiologist, +36-20-825-8057, +36-30-5962-962
On Ked, Április 20, 2010 02:00, Anthony G Basile wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 01:35 +0200, kl
On Tuesday 20 April 2010 Ed W wrote:
> I guess I concede the ebuilds are useful, but I would kind of expect
> most people on this list to be well within the capability to build their
> own kernel,
Well, I can just speak for me. It's not that I'm not able to do it, it's just
that I don't want to
18 matches
Mail list logo
