Re: [gentoo-hardened] hardened vs gentoo sources.

2007-03-21 Thread René Rhéaume
On 3/20/07, Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a related question. Why hardened-sources does not use the base > genpatches? they do/did.. What makes you think otherwise? Older 2.4 hardened-sources were not using genpatches. I thought this aspect has not changed, but I was wrong. -- ge

[gentoo-hardened] Re: "Out of the box" SELinux policy questions...

2007-03-21 Thread Mike Edenfield
Chris PeBenito wrote: It would be nice to find out more specifically what is going on with the other two denials, but I suspect that it will be ok to allow. I use dhcpcd on my server, but don't see this problem. Thanks for all your help so far. Over this weekend I upgraded to the new, modul

Re: [gentoo-hardened] Re: "Out of the box" SELinux policy questions...

2007-03-21 Thread Antoine Martin
Mike Edenfield wrote: Chris PeBenito wrote: It would be nice to find out more specifically what is going on with the other two denials, but I suspect that it will be ok to allow. I use dhcpcd on my server, but don't see this problem. Thanks for all your help so far. Over this weekend I upgr

Re: [gentoo-hardened] Setting up Hardened Gentoo

2007-03-21 Thread Charles Taylor
Any luck on figuring out why PaX doesn't enable??? I"m stuck in the same rutt. > It's the first time for me, that paxtest shows > something else than Vulnerable. > I'll now continue with customising the system and try > to find out, which of my > actions break PaX. > > Thank you very much to eve