On 22 September 2011 20:23, "Tóth Attila" wrote:
> I've suspected, that it won't be a torch-light procession.
> But reality exceeded my expectations.
> Around 60 packages failed out of approx 100! I've followed the ebuild's
> advice, that I leave the old library in place and revdep all packages
>
Is it possible that /usr/lib/libpng.so is still pointing to the old png14 lib?
May have to remove and re-point symlink then run lafilefixer, revdeprebuild.
etc. Hope this helps.
On Sep 23, 2011, at 8:40, Graham Murray wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 12:02 +0100, Michael Delaney wrote:
>> How
On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 12:02 +0100, Michael Delaney wrote:
> How about "lafilefixer --justfixit" ?
>
The .la files still contained references to png14 after that had been
run.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
How about "lafilefixer --justfixit" ?
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:54, Graham Murray wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 20:23 +0100, "Tóth Attila" wrote:
>> I've suspected, that it won't be a torch-light procession.
>> But reality exceeded my expectations.
>> Around 60 packages failed out of approx 100! I'
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 20:23 +0100, "Tóth Attila" wrote:
> I've suspected, that it won't be a torch-light procession.
> But reality exceeded my expectations.
> Around 60 packages failed out of approx 100! I've followed the
> ebuild's
> advice, that I leave the old library in place and revdep all pac
While this is only a temporary solution untill old packages start using
libpng1.5, emering libpng-1.4.8-r2, since it's in a 1.4 slot, fixed all of
the compile errors for me, and kept my 1.5. I don't know if there were any
issues with that version, but I have not run into any.
On 22 September 2011
I've suspected, that it won't be a torch-light procession.
But reality exceeded my expectations.
Around 60 packages failed out of approx 100! I've followed the ebuild's
advice, that I leave the old library in place and revdep all packages
linked to it.
Acutally it would be better to remove the old
