Re: [gentoo-hardened] hardened-sources-3.2.11 + i965 + x.org: possible regression

2012-05-16 Thread RB
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 5:40 PM, "Tóth Attila" wrote: > What's the difference between your kernel konfig and Liberté Linux > 2012.1's kernel konfig? Because you told it worked for you. Quite a lot, not the least of which theirs is a 32-bit kernel and mine's 64-bit. The 'diff -u' between them is

Re: [gentoo-hardened] hardened-sources-3.2.11 + i965 + x.org: possible regression

2012-05-16 Thread Tóth Attila
What's the difference between your kernel konfig and Liberté Linux 2012.1's kernel konfig? Because you told it worked for you. Regards: Dw. -- dr Tóth Attila, Radiológus, 06-20-825-8057 Attila Toth MD, Radiologist, +36-20-825-8057 2012.Május 17.(Cs) 00:41 időpontban RB ezt írta: > On Wed, May 16

Re: [gentoo-hardened] hardened-sources-3.2.11 + i965 + x.org: possible regression

2012-05-16 Thread RB
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Torbjörn Svensson wrote: > Just a thought, have you tried to rebuild x11-drivers/*, most notably > x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel? I've had some strange craches and even > lockups when the X11 driver somehow was out of sync with the running kernel. I have. In fact,

Re: [gentoo-hardened] hardened-sources-3.2.11 + i965 + x.org: possible regression

2012-05-16 Thread Torbjörn Svensson
On 16/05/12 18:54, RB wrote: > It's been a while since I updated the kernel on my T61, was at > hardened-sources-3.2.1. Updating to 3.3.6 this week produced a viable > kernel, but when X starts the system locks hard. In trying different > kernels I've found that the regression is somewhere betwee

Re: [gentoo-hardened] Paxmarkings on mail-client/thunderbird

2012-05-16 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 05/16/2012 12:12 PM, PaX Team wrote: On 16 May 2012 at 16:39, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote: at the moment the thunderbird-ebuild in the tree does a "pax mark m" on the binary. At least for me thunderbird works fine if I just disable jit. there're a few packages that define a local 'jit' US

Re: [gentoo-hardened] hardened-sources-3.2.11 + i965 + x.org: possible regression

2012-05-16 Thread Tóth Attila
Regarding #394443 you find a fix there. No need for marking on x86. -- dr Tóth Attila, Radiológus, 06-20-825-8057 Attila Toth MD, Radiologist, +36-20-825-8057 2012.Május 16.(Sze) 21:35 időpontban Maxim Kammerer ezt írta: > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:06 PM, RB wrote: >> I don't like submitting bug

Re: [gentoo-hardened] hardened-sources-3.2.11 + i965 + x.org: possible regression

2012-05-16 Thread RB
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Maxim Kammerer wrote: > Sorry, meant 2012.1 — the latest release. Well that's both encouraging and discouraging. It works, which means there's something wonky with my kernel config or my environment, even though I've not changed either. Will report back when I f

Re: [gentoo-hardened] hardened-sources-3.2.11 + i965 + x.org: possible regression

2012-05-16 Thread Maxim Kammerer
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Maxim Kammerer wrote: > Hi, you might want to try booting Liberté Linux 2011.2 for an Sorry, meant 2012.1 — the latest release. -- Maxim Kammerer Liberté Linux (discussion / support: http://dee.su/liberte-contribute)

Re: [gentoo-hardened] hardened-sources-3.2.11 + i965 + x.org: possible regression

2012-05-16 Thread Maxim Kammerer
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:06 PM, RB wrote: > I don't like submitting bugs without having already determiend the > root cause, but I might have to make an exception in this case. Hi, you might want to try booting Liberté Linux 2011.2 for an independent verification, since it uses hardened kernel 3

Re: [gentoo-hardened] hardened-sources-3.2.11 + i965 + x.org: possible regression

2012-05-16 Thread RB
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > I'm running 3.2.12 and all is ok here. How about that version? Unfortunately not, just tested hardened-sources-3.2.12 and it exhibited the same behavior, if slightly more graceful than 3.2.11 (part of the oops got printed to the SSH term

Re: [gentoo-hardened] hardened-sources-3.2.11 + i965 + x.org: possible regression

2012-05-16 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On Wednesday 16 May 2012 10:54:12 RB wrote: > I'm planning on submitting a bug, but thought I'd poll the population > first since I'm having trouble putting together a good bug report > (solid lockup). > > It's been a while since I updated the kernel on my T61, was at > hardened-sources-3.2.1. Up

[gentoo-hardened] hardened-sources-3.2.11 + i965 + x.org: possible regression

2012-05-16 Thread RB
I'm planning on submitting a bug, but thought I'd poll the population first since I'm having trouble putting together a good bug report (solid lockup). It's been a while since I updated the kernel on my T61, was at hardened-sources-3.2.1. Updating to 3.3.6 this week produced a viable kernel, but

Re: [gentoo-hardened] Paxmarkings on mail-client/thunderbird

2012-05-16 Thread PaX Team
On 16 May 2012 at 16:39, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote: > at the moment the thunderbird-ebuild in the tree does a "pax mark m" > on the binary. > At least for me thunderbird works fine if I just disable jit. there're a few packages that define a local 'jit' USE flag, i'd say thunderbird/firefox/et

[gentoo-hardened] Paxmarkings on mail-client/thunderbird

2012-05-16 Thread Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, at the moment the thunderbird-ebuild in the tree does a "pax mark m" on the binary. At least for me thunderbird works fine if I just disable jit. What would be the workflow for reporting that. Should I file a bugreport? With kind regards Hinner