Hi!
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 03:49:34PM -0500, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> Take a look at [1] for a good laugh.
Yep, that was funny. :) BTW, if I understood correctly, with proposed
patch my apache won't segfault anymore, but zendoptimizer and ioncube libs
won't be loaded… so this isn't looks like
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 03/08/2011 02:05 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Alex Efros wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 03:25:16PM -0800, Ned Ludd wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 11:12:59PM +0200, pagee...@freemail.hu wrote:
>>>
On 03/08/2011 02:05 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Alex Efros wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 03:25:16PM -0800, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 11:12:59PM +0200, pagee...@freemail.hu wrote:
> ah crap, i know what it is. it's a several years old glibc
2011/3/8 Alex Efros :
> Actually, from initial discussion I got impression this is *well* known
> (at least to PaX/Hardened/Glibc developers) issue, so there unlikely any
> needs in opening new bug. And I don't have patch for glibc. If anyone
> think it have sense to report this to gentoo's bugzill
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Alex Efros wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 02:05:46PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> if there's a bug in glibc, an actual bug in bugs.g.o needs to be
>> opened with real details/patches. otherwise, nothing is going to
>> change.
>
> Actually, from initial discussi
Hi!
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 02:05:46PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> if there's a bug in glibc, an actual bug in bugs.g.o needs to be
> opened with real details/patches. otherwise, nothing is going to
> change.
Actually, from initial discussion I got impression this is *well* known
(at least to
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Alex Efros wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 03:25:16PM -0800, Ned Ludd wrote:
>> > On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 11:12:59PM +0200, pagee...@freemail.hu wrote:
>> > > ah crap, i know what it is. it's a several years old glibc bug where
>> > > someone
>> > > put a certain v
Hi!
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 03:25:16PM -0800, Ned Ludd wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 11:12:59PM +0200, pagee...@freemail.hu wrote:
> > > ah crap, i know what it is. it's a several years old glibc bug where
> > > someone
> > > put a certain variable into the RELRO segment but forgot that it'l
