El 04/11/10 00:26, Francesco R escribió:
> 2010/11/3 Ed W mailto:li...@wildgooses.com>>
>
> Just to run an idea up the flagpole...
>
> I have had good success with a slightly orthogonal approach to
> securing my servers. I run a hardened gentoo install, but with
> linux-vservers fo
2010/11/3 Ed W
> Just to run an idea up the flagpole...
>
> I have had good success with a slightly orthogonal approach to securing my
> servers. I run a hardened gentoo install, but with linux-vservers for the
> guests and additionally pax kernel patches.
>
> The motivation is that Pax has miti
Just to run an idea up the flagpole...
I have had good success with a slightly orthogonal approach to securing
my servers. I run a hardened gentoo install, but with linux-vservers
for the guests and additionally pax kernel patches.
The motivation is that Pax has mitigated a reasonable propor
It is a good candidate to become a conditional patch for hardened.
Dw.
--
dr Tóth Attila, Radiológus, 06-20-825-8057, 06-30-5962-962
Attila Toth MD, Radiologist, +36-20-825-8057, +36-30-5962-962
2010.November 3.(Sze) 19:09 időpontban Ed W ezt írta:
> On 28/10/2010 02:14, Pavel Labushev wrote:
>>
On 28/10/2010 02:14, Pavel Labushev wrote:
eruption or something else. Now collection is expanded to patches that
will not be mainstreamed :> This is GOOD PRACTICE :). Thinking about
Another distros do include patches for glibc not accepted by mainstream.
In this particular case the patch is p
