On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 22:30 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Why do you want mountd to tuch /dev/sdb1 to start with? I thing you
> have a
> missconfiguration somewhere...
/dev/sdb1 is the partition that it's supposed to share. I never had a
problem with the NFS config other than with SELinux now
Iptables does not work for me in selinux with the default configuration.
To be precise '/etc/init.d/iptables save' fails to write the rules to
'/var/lib/iptables/rules-save'.
In fact if I do not disable enforcing that file ends up empty no matter if
I had or had not anything in it before.
dmesg l
Why do you want mountd to tuch /dev/sdb1 to start with? I thing you have a
missconfiguration somewhere...
For me most/all NFS denials went away when I restructured the folder
placments on my system to acctually follow "the standard" (i.e. place
stuff where NFS are supposed to read/write to them) a
Alex Efros wrote:
Hi!
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 06:15:22AM -0800, Grant wrote:
Are a hardened profile, kernel, and related USE flags beneficial on a
machine on which only I log in and no ports are open?
If you open website, or download and run mp3, or download and open .xls,
etc. - do any actio
I've got a server setup with the selinux/2007.0/amd64 profile. I've got
most of my services working but I'm having an issue with NFS.
# uname -a
Linux foo 2.6.24-gentoo-r2 #3 SMP Tue Feb 19 17:58:43 EST 2008 x86_64
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5310 @ 1.60GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
# sestatus
SELinux st
Hi!
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 06:15:22AM -0800, Grant wrote:
> Are a hardened profile, kernel, and related USE flags beneficial on a
> machine on which only I log in and no ports are open?
If you open website, or download and run mp3, or download and open .xls,
etc. - do any action which result in
Are a hardened profile, kernel, and related USE flags beneficial on a
machine on which only I log in and no ports are open?
- Grant
--
gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
