> Has anyone done anything like this? Is it silly to even think that the
> hand-applied patches will apply without rejects?
I haven't tried myself, but I have read in a few spots that it can't be
done.
> Or should I be doing a strictly Xen kernel as the host kernel and if I
> want SELinux/PaX/GR
Hi!
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 12:28:40AM -0400, Kevin wrote:
> If I wanted all four of the Xen/SELinux/PaX/GRSecurity patch sets
> incorporated into a kernel, any recommendations for doing this?
AFAIK hardened-sources already contain SELinux+PaX+GRSecurity.
--
WBR, Alex.
-
Hi Folks-
I've read a little discussion in the archive on this subject (such as
http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org/msg00338.html)
but not much and not recently.
I've also read a little discussion in non-gentoo forums:
http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/01/044
Jan V wrote:
The gentoo-hardened mailing list is not able to support users. Here
mostly physicians and math-specialists are posting, known as devs. We
need a mailing list, where people without your capabilities but that
still want to use hardened environments can share their thoughts and
mostl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In my experience, most doctors know little to nothing about computers, let
alone developing a hardened Linux distribution... ;)
try #gentoo or #gentoo-hardened on irc.freenode.net
- -Brant
On Sat, 6 May 2006, Jan V wrote:
mostly physicians a
Hi!
On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 09:35:59PM +0200, Jan V wrote:
>The gentoo-hardened mailing list is not able to support users. Here
>mostly physicians and math-specialists are posting, known as devs. We
>need a mailing list, where people without your capabilities but that
>still want t
The gentoo-hardened mailing list is not able to support users. Here mostly physicians and math-specialists are posting, known as devs. We need a mailing list, where people without your capabilities but that still want to use hardened environments can share their thoughts and mostly *get help*.So, p
hi,
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 07:49:31PM -0400, Kevin wrote:
[..]
> Also, there's one issue that I'm not quite understanding in this thread,
> though, and I've asked the question in a number of different phrasings
> (marked with [] ) because I'm having difficulty figuring out how to
> express the q
