Re: [gentoo-dev] nss_* and system users

2006-06-16 Thread paul kölle
Chris Gianelloni wrote: > Most things *should* not to *anything* if the account exists in > mysql/ldap/nis/etc as the account is already present. Right, i.e. use NSS for the query and *don't* use hacks like grepping /etc/passwd. > It's just the > case of it *not* existing that causes the real pr

[gentoo-dev] writing net.xx style init script

2006-08-20 Thread paul kölle
Hi all, I need to write an init-script for multiple instances of the same service with different configurations (need to start/stop them individually) similar to what the net.xx scripts do. I thought I could get the instance name from $0 and use it as a key to look up the configuration in /etc/co

Re: [gentoo-dev] writing net.xx style init script

2006-08-20 Thread paul kölle
Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Sunday 20 August 2006 08:01, paul kölle wrote: >> How do I get the name of the called script in /etc/init.d? Better ideas? > > use $SVCNAME > > see the sshd init.d script for some examples thanks mike, you got me started ;) actually there is

[gentoo-dev] java and start-stop-daemon [repost]

2006-08-22 Thread paul kölle
[posted on gentoo-java without luck, I hope those rc-stuff questions are not too off topic here...] Hi all, I'm trying to write a startup script for helma (http://helma.org) but start-stop-daemon gives me trouble here (I briefly looked at the jboss and jetty scripts but they don't use start-stop-

Re: [gentoo-dev] java and start-stop-daemon [repost]

2006-08-22 Thread paul kölle
Roy Marples wrote: > On Tuesday 22 August 2006 08:42, paul kölle wrote: [ snipp ] >> Starting /opt/sun-jdk-1.5.0.08/bin/java... >> Detatching to start /opt/sun-jdk-1.5.0.08/bin/java...done. >> [ ok ] >> >> -> app not running >> >> I'm mostly in

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo: static/dynamic linking libraries

2007-04-29 Thread paul kölle
Roman Zimmermann wrote: > So I'm with Ciaran here: It works for almost all packages and makes at least > some difference. Maybe enough to (really) give the users the choice (without > the ugly EXTRA_ECONF-hack)? I wonder why you call this an ugly hack? It seems to me everyone who wishes to avoid