* On Nov 22 10:15, Chris Gianelloni (gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org) wrote:
> It isn't pretty much anymore. It *is* exactly the same.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but if you're going to attempt to get the same
result as a stage1 with a stage3 - (which won't be exactly the same,
given the defaults of s
* On May 25 18:20, Mike Frysinger (gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org) wrote:
> so can people please try out baselayout-1.11.12-r2+ and see if they
> notice any regressions ? the 'best' tests are simply rebooting and
> seeing if your system comes up :)
Working great here on ~x86, aside from the initia