[gentoo-dev] Re: Decision to remove stage1/2 from installation documentation

2005-11-22 Thread Thomas Kirchner
* On Nov 22 10:15, Chris Gianelloni (gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org) wrote: > It isn't pretty much anymore. It *is* exactly the same. Correct me if I'm wrong, but if you're going to attempt to get the same result as a stage1 with a stage3 - (which won't be exactly the same, given the defaults of s

[gentoo-dev] Re: baselayout-1.11.12-r2 request for testers

2005-05-26 Thread Thomas Kirchner
* On May 25 18:20, Mike Frysinger (gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org) wrote: > so can people please try out baselayout-1.11.12-r2+ and see if they > notice any regressions ? the 'best' tests are simply rebooting and > seeing if your system comes up :) Working great here on ~x86, aside from the initia