On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 20:34 +0100, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Thursday 22 December 2005 08:13, Bret Towe wrote:
> > On 12/21/05, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > > > I know some of you have done research on how gentoo-x86 converts over
> > > > to other sys
On Sat, 2005-12-24 at 03:37 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> On Saturday 24 December 2005 03:23, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > On Friday 23 December 2005 19:12, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:57:44 +0100 Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > | Do those already work then? I'd like to
On Fri, 2005-12-30 at 10:35 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> On Friday 30 December 2005 01:35, Spider (DmD Lj) wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 19:06 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 19:53:14 +0100 Carsten Lohrke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
On Fri, 2005-12-30 at 21:49 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> On Friday 30 December 2005 21:17, Spider (DmD Lj) wrote:
> >
> > No, what you suggested was that for the case of when you depend on a
> > SLOT, then the tree is flattened. My point was for the generic case :
>
On Fri, 2005-12-30 at 22:54 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
>
>
> A still inelegant solution, but one that I could live with, is to
> leave SLOT handling as it is now and to take Brian's syntax of
> key:slot,slot using it specifically for the case where a set of
> ebuilds must all use the same slot.
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 10:35 +0100, Alexandre Buisse wrote:
>
> After my last sync, I have this new block between evince and xpdf, which
> is a problem at least to me.
>
> Isn't there any way to make xpdf and poppler live together on the same
> system?
Yeah. : )
See, poppler blocks against -o
