Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving GCC-3.4 to stable on x86

2005-11-30 Thread Simon Strandman
fixed. Whenever I try 3.4.4 I can't rebuild glibc because of this bug. Why don't you just reemerge gcc 3.4.4 without the vanilla USE-flag then? -- Simon Strandman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] toolchain.eclass and gcc 4.1 snapshots

2006-03-25 Thread Simon Strandman
It seems like toolchain.eclass does something wrong when configuring gcc 4.1 snapshots. I decided to try gcc 4.1 on my server so I created a gcc-4.1.1.20060324 ebuild and defined the SNAPSHOT variable in it (current cvs has a lot of bugfixes since the release). This is the way I've done it with

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: toolchain.eclass and gcc 4.1 snapshots

2006-03-27 Thread Simon Strandman
R Hill skrev: Simon Strandman wrote: It seems like toolchain.eclass does something wrong when configuring gcc 4.1 snapshots. I decided to try gcc 4.1 on my server so I created a gcc-4.1.1.20060324 ebuild and defined the SNAPSHOT variable in it (current cvs has a lot of bugfixes since the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: toolchain.eclass and gcc 4.1 snapshots

2006-03-27 Thread Simon Strandman
Simon Strandman skrev: R Hill skrev: Simon Strandman wrote: It seems like toolchain.eclass does something wrong when configuring gcc 4.1 snapshots. I decided to try gcc 4.1 on my server so I created a gcc-4.1.1.20060324 ebuild and defined the SNAPSHOT variable in it (current cvs has a lot of

[gentoo-dev] Modular X and hardened

2006-05-12 Thread Simon Strandman
Hello I installed modular X on my server running hardened. It was quite annoying to have to switch back and forth betwen the vanilla gcc and the hardened. I couldn't leave it on compiling over the night but had to monitor it all the time. Is this really necessary? Why can't the modular X ecla

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X and hardened

2006-05-13 Thread Simon Strandman
Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) skrev: On Fri, 12 May 2006 10:49:22 +0200 Simon Strandman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I installed modular X on my server running hardened. X on a server? If it's just for the libs that's ok, but running the X server itself is risky on a server

Re: [gentoo-dev] X.Org 7.1 is Stable

2006-10-16 Thread Simon Strandman
Chris Gianelloni skrev: On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 17:28 -0600, Joshua Baergen wrote: I also add that many, many bugs were fixed. To run Compiz using AIGLX, xorg-server must be build with the "aiglx" USE-flag. This is known to cause some EXA slowdowns (bug #147841). Just as an aside, this

[gentoo-dev] Glibc builds and --as-needed

2005-10-11 Thread Simon Strandman
tried bootstraping from stage1 with --as-needed and neither my amd64 or x86 has any problems completeing it. Perhaps this can be reconsidered? -- Simon Strandman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Glibc builds and --as-needed

2005-10-12 Thread Simon Strandman
Mark Loeser skrev: Simon Strandman wrote: I'm curious why --as-needed is disabled for glibc builds. It was first added over a year ago in one of the early 2.3.4 builds so is it still nessecary? I tried removing it and had no problems building glibc and I could see that it was used

Re: [gentoo-dev] modular X - 7.0 RC1

2005-10-20 Thread Simon Strandman
ortly. I'd appreciate input on http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/xorg-x11/metabuilds.txt and in particular from people on the GNOME and KDE teams. Thanks, Donnie Will you add a ebuild for the 6.9-RC1 release also, or will gentoo go completely for the modular tree? -- Simon Strandman <[EMAIL PROT