Hey!
Thanks everyone for your thoughts so far!
>From what I heard, these two options seem realistic to me:
A) Ask the KDE team for help with teaming up on a new package
dev-util/cmake-bootstrap, keep it in sync with dev-util/cmake,
make sure both packages co-exists with full disjoint oper
Hey!
On 19.12.19 17:03, Michał Górny wrote:
>> B) Introduce USE flag "system-expat" to CMake similar to existing
>>flag "system-jsoncpp", have it off by default, keep reminding
>>CMake upstream to update their bundle
>>
>> [..]
>
> It violates the policy on bundled libraries.
Same for t
On 19.12.19 18:37, Michał Górny wrote:
> We have a better alternative that lets us limit the impact on the users.
> Why not use it?
Which one? The CMake bootstrap copy? The adding to stage3 one?
Hi!
I'm wondering if there is an equivalent of debootstrap of Debian
anywhere. By equivalent I mean a tool that ..
* I can run like "command FOLDER" with a chroot-able
Gentoo system in FOLDER after and
* for both stage3 and portage tarballs
* Downloading tarball
* Downloading signat
Hi!
On 28.12.2014 11:26, Johann Schmitz (ercpe) wrote:
> I wrote gentoo-bootstrap
> (https://github.com/ercpe/gentoo-bootstrap) some time ago to
> automate the creation of Gentoo Xen DomU's at work. It can do a lot
> of more things (e.g. installing packages, overlays, etc.).
Interesting tool!
Hi!
Debian is putting Grub2 background (or "splash") images into
/usr/share/images/grub/ [1] but we do no not have an /usr/share/images/
folder.
(I'm not referring to full themes, just background images.)
If I were to make media-gfx/grub-splashes:2, where would it install to?
Thanks,
Sebasti
Hi!
I got a bug report for arm64 against the test suite of uriparser. If I
could get a temporary arm64 shell somewhere, that could help me
understand the issue.
Best,
Sebastian
On 01.02.2015 23:17, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hi, developers.
>
> Just a quick note: the CPU_FLAGS_X86 conversion of the Gentoo
> repository is complete now.
Cool! Thanks for fixing the freeverb3 ebuild, too.
Best,
Sebastian
Feb 15th, presuming all
> the stars are in alignment. If someone else doesn’t help you before, please
> mark it on your calendar and bug me again then cause I’m sure I’ll forget!
>
> Best,
> Tom
>
>
>> On Jan 25, 2015, at 11:43 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
>>
>
Hi!
Please excuse bringing up a topic as old as this, again.
Only bringing up half, actually.
On 05.05.2011 07:36, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> On 05/01/2011 06:10 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> Could you bisect Blender to find out why it doesn't work with the new
>> version
On 23.02.2015 23:34, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> Can't the logo be remade in a more recent version of Blender? Assuming
> you can run two separate Blender instances, it would mostly be copying
> the poly/vertex values from one to the other.
>
> I'm not versed in 3-D but it would surprise me if there
On 07.06.2011 11:15, Mario Bodemann wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Sebastian told me about the problem of not being able to render the
> logo in recent blender versions. So this is were I stepped in: I tried
> it and used the geometries from the old .blender file, and the
> yellowish reflecting image.
>
On 23.03.2015 18:22, Tim Harder wrote:
> With that in mind, I think it would be an interesting experiment if
> we had a collaborative herd (probably named "collab") that signals
> the status that anyone is generally free to fix, bump, or do sane
> things to the pkgs with the caveat that you fix wha
protection
Author: Sebastian Pipping
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2015-03-26
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 1.0
Display-If-Installed: www-servers/apache
Apache's directive AddHandler [1] can be used to map
certain file name extensions (e.g. .php) to a handler
(e.g. application/x-http
xt.
Good point.
Changes:
* Revision bump
* Add section on .php.inc
* Add thanks line
Title: Apache AddHandler vulnerability protection
Author: Sebastian Pipping
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2015-03-26
Revision: 2
News-I
On 26.03.2015 20:50, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> * Sebastian Pipping schrieb am 26.03.15 um 19:15 Uhr:
>> As of the momment, affected packages include:
> ^ Typo
Thanks. Fixed in my local copy. No need to re-paste, I believe.
Best,
Sebastian
On 14.03.2015 23:25, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Trying to explain to a new user that the Portage tree refers to the
> collection of ebuilds used by a PMS-compliant package manager (eg
> Portage) is problematic.
Full ack. Let's limit "portage" to the piece of software, please.
> Questions: 0. Wha
On 15.03.2015 10:48, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> If we want a separate repo/ namespace, we would probably need to
>> consider moving other repositories there -- at least the
>> official ones. Of course, it would be a nice result, having
>> everything hosted on git.g.o as git.g.o/repo/${repo_name}.git
Hi!
I was wondering about the same thing, too.
I can commit it as revision 1 for a workaround.
If you have some time, please take this question/issue further with the
related software and people.
Thanks in advance,
Sebastian
On 27.03.2015 15:33, Hanno Böck wrote:
> I think defaulting the net to HTTPS is a big step for more security and
> I think Gentoo should join the trend here.
Yes please!
Sebastian
Hi!
For the current Gentoo Git setup I found these methods working for
accessing a repository, betagarden in this case:
git://anongit.gentoo.org/proj/betagarden.git
(git://git.gentoo.org/proj/betagarden.git)
(git://git.overlays.gentoo.org/proj/betagarden.git)
http://anongit.gentoo.org/git
On 29.03.2015 19:39, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 18:41:33 +0200 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
>> So I would like to propose that
>>
>> * support for Git access through https:// is activated,
>>
>> * Git access through http:// and git:// is deact
On 29.03.2015 19:56, Diamond wrote:
> Doesn't git:// uses SSH wich is secure? I think that was on github.
git:// is "the git protocol" [1] "with absolutely no authentication" and
no encryption.
GitHub does not support git:// but only secure protocols (HTTPS, SSH),
see [2].
Best,
Sebastian
[
d due to new link [2])
Title: Apache AddHandler/AddType vulnerability protection
Author: Sebastian Pipping
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2015-03-30
Revision: 3
News-Item-Format: 1.0
Display-If-Installed: www-servers/apache
Apache's
Published a slightly improved version now:
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/gentoo-news.git/tree/2015/2015-04-06-apache-addhandler-addtype
If there's anything wrong with it, please mail me directly (or put me in
CC) so there is zero chance of slipping through. Thanks!
Best,
Sebastian
Hello Duncan,
On 06.04.2015 06:53, Duncan wrote:
> Sebastian Pipping posted on Mon, 06 Apr 2015 01:29:19 +0200 as excerpted:
>
>> Published a slightly improved version now:
>>
>> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/gentoo-news.git/tree/2015/2015-04-06-
> apache-addhandl
Hi there!
I'm having trouble updating Qt:4 (dev-qt/qt*-4.8*:4) from 4.8.6 to 4.8.7.
Looking at the ebuilds, they require some 4.8.7 versions to be installed
already that in turn cannot be installed because other ebuilds require
4.8.6 while not yet upgraded.
I am running the latest version of por
On 05.07.2015 20:44, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> What I usually end up doing is listing my installed dev-qt/qt* ebuilds, and
> updating all of them together explicitly:
>
> emerge -1 qtcore:4 qtgui:4 qtsql:4 etc.
That's what I tried but it doesn't seem to work with this update.
Looking at the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20.07.2015 10:51, Michał Górny wrote:
> [..] I think we'd really benefit from having some kind of helper
> scripts / checklist of tasks to be done prior to/after install.
>
> For example, you'd run 'check-my-install' script and it'd tell you
> what
On 19.08.2015 18:33, hasufell wrote:
> I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is
> practically useless.
>
> If there has been a problem with a commit, ask the developer about his
> repoman version (which I believe was the reason for this, unless you
> want me to add
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09.12.2015 07:41, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 21:54:44 + (UTC) "Sebastian Pipping"
> wrote:
>
>> commit: a1ea06b430e14f68b5b7bf1947a681215157c034 Author:
>> Sebastian Pipping gentoo org>
Hi!
Better late then never. Posting 72 hours from now the earliest as
advised by GLEP 42. Feedback welcome as usual.
===
Title: Apache "-D PHP5" needs update to "-D PHP"
Author: Sebastian Pipping
Content-Type: tex
On 05.01.2016 20:35, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> I just pushed a new revision with this fix. In eselect-php-0.8.2-r1,
> we ship both the new 70_mod_php.conf and the old 70_mod_php5.conf. The
> latter comes with a big warning at the top of it, stating that it is for
> backwards compatibility only.
Co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04.01.2016 11:45, Lars Wendler wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> to be honest I was very upset when I first stumbled upon this
> problem. And yes I only found about it when my apache webserver
> started to deliver php source code instead of the real sites
Hi!
docker-compose upstream has apparently re-written docker-compose in
Golang from scratch. While I'm happy to keep maintaining the current
python-based =2.0.0 in Gentoo.
Thanks in advance!
Best
Sebastian
# Sebastian Pipping (2024-10-03)
# Masked for removal in 30 days. Last release in 2021,
# last commit two years ago, has open bugs, .. (bug #940725).
# Also removing its two dependencies that have no other
# reverse dependencies in Gentoo or known use outside of Lurch.
net-libs/libaxc
net-libs
Hi!
This is basically https://bugs.gentoo.org/946784 and a call for help via
e-mail to a wider audience:
I've been maintaining the Bash version of app-admin/checksec 2.x.x so
far but I won't be a good maintainer of a >=3.0.0 ebuild targeting
Golang that upstream switched to. If you can help wi
On 22.12.24 01:46, Sam James wrote:
How do you propose the slot be handled? Do you plan to rename the 2.x
version as checksec-2 and have the :3 one be checksec or checksec-3?
I originally envisioned two slots: 0 and 3 (or 0->2 and 3 if someone
feels like a slot move). If it's considered benef
On 22.12.24 03:08, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
I'm confused, why is slotting needed? Is there a reason to ever install
both versions at same time?
With 3.0.0 being so new and not providing feature parity with 2.7.1 yet
I felt that some period of co-existence could help the transition period.
401 - 439 of 439 matches
Mail list logo
