Am 23.04.2012 19:49, schrieb Pacho Ramos:
> El lun, 23-04-2012 a las 10:17 -0400, Mike Gilbert escribió:
>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net>
>> wrote:
>>> Samuli Suominen posted on Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:22:53 +0300 as
>>> excerpted:
>>>
Title: The default JPEG impl
Am 17.12.2010 16:25, schrieb Ciaran McCreesh:
> So would anyone be especially opposed to making "best leftmost" an
> explicit requirement, enforced by repoman where possible (at least for
> the >= / < case)?
>
Why can't the PM handle >= / < cases itself?
Sebastian
Am 17.12.2010 17:37, schrieb Ciaran McCreesh:
> On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:27:05 +0100
> Sebastian Luther wrote:
>> Am 17.12.2010 16:25, schrieb Ciaran McCreesh:
>>> So would anyone be especially opposed to making "best leftmost" an
>>> explicit requirement
Am 13.10.2011 15:13, schrieb Ciaran McCreesh:
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:23:07 +0200
> Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
>> So qutecom is not broken and needs not be removed as long as
>>
> Dependencies using <, <=, =, ~ or =* are broken, except in certain
> special situations inside ||.
>
Why
gt; On Thursday 13 October 2011 14:15:54 Sebastian Luther wrote:
> > WARNING: One or more updates have been skipped due to a dependency
> > conflict:
> >
> > dev-python/numpy:0
> > (dev-python/numpy-1.6.0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) conflicts
> > with ~d
