On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 02:58:54 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, in general, if you rely on extensions changing every time a
> > program cannot deal with a new feature of a file format, it would be
> > quite crazy. For example, if C programs had to start using ".c-2",
> > "
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:11:11 +0100
Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 19 June 2008 02:43:12 Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > Nope. What I see as a problem is that the primary author and
> > current de facto maintainer is so much of an asshole that he was
> > forcibly removed from th
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:52:02 -0500
"Jeremy Olexa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On a side note: How is the "b-w SOP doc" coming? It is obvious to me
> the b-w is tedious a time consuming so I would like to help every now
> and then but I really am not sure about the rules wrt assignment just
> by lo
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:34:11 +0900
Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adam Stylinski wrote:
> > The intel C Compiler (icc)
>
> icc, xlc, llvm, sunstudio could be interesting fields of discovery.
>
> Which are the pitfalls of using icc?
>
> lu
>
If I recall correctly, needing some packa
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:30:20 +0200
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IMHO it would be better to teach users to explicitly specify
> '@system' during updates, e.g. `emerge -uDN @system @world`.
Why not just re-instate the implicit dependency of world on system?
Rob.
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:16:18 +0100
Sébastien Fabbro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There was some attempts a few years ago for rolling up a full Gentoo
> with icc, but it hit several problems if I recall. Now both icc and
> gcc have improved since then.
Including needing package specific CFLAGS bec
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 09:17:10 +0200
Aniruddha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Borg hasn't been updated in portage for a while despite the fact that
> new versions were released over a year ago (see
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184699 ). Therefor I suggest
> app-office/borg gets removed fr
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:42:35 +0200
Aniruddha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've filed the bugreport (version bump) a year ago. It looks like borg
> has no maintainer.
So maintain it. You don't need to be a dev to write an ebuild, and
there are enough devs who are happy to throw an eye over user do
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:10:18 -0400
Jim Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IANAL, but the following line is critical:
> it is essential to do so in order to
> achieve operability of the Software with another software program, and
> you have first requested Adobe to provide the information necessary
On Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:37:25 -0700
Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ryan Hill wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:31:46 -0700
> > Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>> Can package.use syntax be extended to allow set entries?
> >>
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:56:37 +0200
Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:48:19 +0200
> Fabian Groffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Whatever. Some of you seem to have some quite agressive dislikement
> > to it. In the end it's just a name/tag. I guess I could live
On Sat, 01 Nov 2008 12:05:54 +0100
Ben de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to add a new category to the tree: lxde-base, to be used
> for the LXDE desktop [1,2] packages, in correspondence to the
> categories for the other desktop environments we have (gnome, kde,
> xfce).
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:03:12 +0100
"Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to add NETBEANS to USE_EXPAND. Netbeans (www.netbeans.org) is
> modular IDE with 18 modules (clusters). Users can freely choose what
> support thay want to build in netbeans, though some modules nee
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:36:29 -0700
> Joe Peterson wrote:
>> 2) it makes sense to have these in the filename, but not
>> internal meta-data
>
> For those of us who understand the process, it makes sense to have EAPI
> in the filename too.
Which seems to be an enlightened
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:17:57 +
> Except that once we have EAPI in the file extension, we can change
> anything we want in arbitrary ways without having to worry about
> backwards compatibility, so we won't need silly hacks.
Like the file name structure?
Petteri Räty wrote:
> 2) EAPI in file extension
> - Allows changing global scope and the internal format of the ebuild
> a) .ebuild-
> - ignored by current Portage
> b) ..ebuild
> - current Portage does not work with this
> c) ..
> - ignored by current Portage
I have been think
Markos Chandras wrote:
Some one could say "Post it on gentoo.org homepage". I wonder if users ever
visit that page to read gentoo news :\
I can safely say that some never do...
RobbieAB
Patrick Lauer wrote:
On Thursday 14 May 2009 20:39:07 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2009 20:06:51 +0200
Patrick Lauer wrote:
Let EAPI be defined as (the part behind the = of) the first line of
the ebuild starting with EAPI=
Uh, so horribly utterly and obviously wrong.
inherit fo
Speaking as a user, I seem to recall having multiple versions of python
installed in the past, and never really knowing or caring which version was
being used so long as stuff worked. If you want to install python-3.14159 in
the stable tree, than go right ahead, so long as anything that doesn't wor
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 4:09 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
wrote:
> On 7/31/10 4:37 AM, Hanno Böck wrote:
>> Though we might discuss if vpx is really a good name or it shouldn't be vp8.
>
> It might also be webm. Not sure what's more intuitive for people. Also,
> nteresting question would be whether to
On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 09:47, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> Option 1: IP-based limiting
> ===
>
Preface this with IANAL, check with your own legal counsel...
While IP address based methods might be attractive technically, do
remember that an IP address is considered Personall
There are only 4 billion to reverse, not that hard really with a rainbow
table...
On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 13:08, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-05-21 at 13:57 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > > On Thu, 21 May 2020, Robert Bridge wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2
22 matches
Mail list logo
