On 06/27/2010 09:10 PM, dev-ran...@mail.ru wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 08:48:25PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
...
It is allowed. Section 7.1.1, Paragraphs 2 and 3 of the C++ standard:
...
Not in C.
ISO/IEC 9899:1999 (aka C99), section 6.7.1, note 101:
The implementation may treat any
On 06/28/2010 10:51 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:44:54 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
You've forgotten "make --as-needed not break correct code by making
the linker ignore explicit instructions from a program author to
link two things together". Until you do that, --as-needed
On 07/01/2010 11:00 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
[...]
The way to control compiler flags in Gentoo is CFLAGS.
That is true. However, there's a problem; you can control package
options of individual packages with USE flags, but you can't control
compilation switches of individual packages with CFLAGS
On 07/04/2010 05:29 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
Hi list,
now that openrc has no active upstram anymore [1] what shall we do? To be
honest I was really looking forward for openrc/baselayout-2 finally becoming
stable in Gentoo but this seems to be quite implausible now that openrc has no
upstream anym
I've updated to dev-libs/openssl-1.0.0a today, and it tells me:
Old versions of installed libraries were detected on your system.
In order to avoid breaking packages that depend on these old libs,
the libraries are not being removed. You need to run revdep-rebuild
in order to remove these old de
On 11/15/2010 01:30 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Il giorno dom, 14/11/2010 alle 22.03 +0100, Thomas Kahle ha scritto:
I have a package (sci-libs/mpir) whose configure supports building of
fat binaries with both x86 and amd64 assembler in the binary.
Oh the heck are they implemented? If they a
On 11/21/2010 12:46 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
I'm unmasking sys-devel/gcc-4.5.1 tomorrow. I'd like to recommend everyone
who has already unmasked it to rebuild it now as there has been some important
patches added recently (see ChangeLog).
revbump?
On 11/21/2010 04:57 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 01:38:23 +0200
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 11/21/2010 12:46 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
I'm unmasking sys-devel/gcc-4.5.1 tomorrow. I'd like to recommend everyone
who has already unmasked it to rebuild it now as there has
On 11/21/2010 08:49 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 13:54:19 +0200
Alex Alexander wrote:
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 01:47:57AM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 17:35:18 +1300
Alistair Bush wrote:
We don't do revbumps on masked toolchain packages.
Why not?
Yeah why not?
On 11/23/2010 09:32 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday, November 23, 2010 01:36:15 Graham Murray wrote:
Mike Frysinger writes:
well, not quite. the way we agreed in the past was to not revbump the
masked package, but once it was unmasked, we revbump it just once at
that point.
Is there so
On 01/20/2011 11:14 AM,
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_h...@lavabit.com
wrote:
There is a font for coders called Rail Model, please include it with Linux
distributions:
http://code.google.com/p/railmodel/downloads/detail?name=RailModelFont.zip&can
On 01/29/2011 07:03 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
I would like to know what is "blocking" this from landing main tree in
the "near" future, as I reviewed:
http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org/msg41737.html
and looks like there wasn't major problems (at least commented in this
thread
It seems that KDE 4.6 is still hard-masked for x86 and amd64 because
it's waiting for ppc and ppc64 keywords. I believe it would be
beneficial for people if they wouldn't have to wait for arches that
don't affect them at all.
It seems better if the packages can be unmasked for x86 and amd64 a
On 02/02/2011 10:30 AM, Kacper Kowalik wrote:
W dniu 02.02.2011 08:59, Nikos Chantziaras pisze:
It seems that KDE 4.6 is still hard-masked for x86 and amd64 because
it's waiting for ppc and ppc64 keywords. I believe it would be
beneficial for people if they wouldn't have to wait
On 02/02/2011 11:01 PM, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
Hi,
Nikos Chantziaras:
On 02/02/2011 10:30 AM, Kacper Kowalik wrote:
W dniu 02.02.2011 08:59, Nikos Chantziaras pisze:
It seems that KDE 4.6 is still hard-masked for x86 and amd64
because it's waiting for ppc and ppc64 keywords. I be
On 02/13/2011 01:21 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday, February 11, 2011 11:49:43 Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 02/11/2011 06:38 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
4) What have we learned from libpng 1.2 -> 1.4 upgrade? I'd just like to
be better informed.
[...]
We have been discussing about remov
On 02/28/2011 08:18 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
libjpeg-turbo-1.1.0 final is out and in tree now, and everything in tree
has been tested against it working.
Unless any objections, i'll commit this minor change so ~arch users will
get it by default now:
[...]
While you're at it, could you change
On 03/05/2011 04:41 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Alex Alexander wrote:
Anyway, compilation on a modern system shouldn't take more than an
hour. ~15-20 minutes on a quad i5.
Clearly your definition of modern doesn't include my server... :)
Just checked and the last
On 03/05/2011 12:00 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 03/05/2011 04:41 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Alex Alexander wrote:
Anyway, compilation on a modern system shouldn't take more than an
hour. ~15-20 minutes on a quad i5.
Clearly your definition of modern do
On 03/29/2011 08:00 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:24 PM, justin wrote:
Hi,
the descriptions of USE flags should explain what the USE is good for.
In my opinion some thing like
Enables foo intergration
or
Enables support for foo
if it isn't totally clear what "foo" is, suck
Why did the bump to Qt 4.7.3 happen? AFAIK, it only contains Symbian
changes, and Gentoo does not run on the Symbian platform.
On 05/11/2011 02:11 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 02:05:16PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Why did the bump to Qt 4.7.3 happen? AFAIK, it only contains Symbian
changes, and Gentoo does not run on the Symbian platform.
Sorry wrong link
http://qt.nokia.com/developer
On 05/11/2011 03:32 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 11.5.2011 13:05, Nikos Chantziaras napsal(a):
Why did the bump to Qt 4.7.3 happen? AFAIK, it only contains Symbian
changes, and Gentoo does not run on the Symbian platform.
With this approach you
On 06/25/2011 12:35 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello,
git-2.eclass is in the tree for a while now, and there's still awful
lot of packages using old& deprecated git.eclass.
I think I remember seeing deprecation warnings in the past when an
ebuild was using a deprecated eclass (right at the begi
On 06/26/2011 06:54 PM, Philip Webb wrote:
Yesterday, I upgraded 'xorg-drivers' to the latest stable 1.10
& then found upon rebooting that X failed to recognise the keyboard.
Yes, it's happened before& I was not surprised:
I had to switch the machine off, reboot, login as root
-- experience lon
On 06/26/2011 09:25 PM, Philip Webb wrote:
110626 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 06/26/2011 06:54 PM, Philip Webb wrote:
Yesterday, I upgraded 'xorg-drivers' to the latest stable 1.10
& then found upon rebooting that X failed to recognise the keyboard.
Yes, it's happened
On 08/24/2011 01:48 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
[...]
If you sneakily add something to cron.daily by default you can get
pretty nice coverage. But I guess anyone trying that in Gentooland will
meet some rather unpleasant resistance :)
emerge always asks me after a world update whether I want to "a
Can users file stable and keyword requests?
I believe something needs to be done with the zlib-1.2.5.1-r1 and -r2
packages currently in the tree. The maintainer of zlib pushed those
revisions with a patch that alters macro identifiers, making Gentoo's
zlib incompatible with upstream. As a result, a lot of packages stopped
building. Bu
On 09/24/2011 02:10 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I believe something needs to be done with the zlib-1.2.5.1-r1 and -r2
packages currently in the tree. The maintainer of zlib pushed those
revisions with a patch that alters macro identifiers
On 09/24/2011 02:40 AM, Alec Warner wrote:
This was just another episode of Vapier's hostile and arrogant behavior
towards users. Every time someone comes up with a valid argument of why
he's wrong, the final answer is "don't care, I do what I please because I'm
the dev and you're not." So my r
On 09/24/2011 03:23 AM, Brian Harring wrote:
[...] Right now, zlib does the
exact opposite of what should be done; Vapier changed zlib, and tries to
fix the packages that break because of that change. The correct way to
handle it is to let zlib be, and fix the packages that stopped working
with
On 09/24/2011 08:24 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday, September 23, 2011 17:44:50 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I believe something needs to be done with the zlib-1.2.5.1-r1 and -r2
packages currently in the tree. The maintainer of zlib pushed those
revisions with a patch that alters macro
On 09/24/2011 10:07 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 02:43, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 09/24/2011 08:24 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
the defines in question are internal to zlib. packages relying on them
are broken, plain and simple.
Then fix *them*, not zlib.
they are
On 22/02/12 00:38, Alec Warner wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
As looks like fixing old grub is far away because nobody know what is
causing that issues, probably trying to get grub-1.99 ready for
stabilization would be interesting (we will need to do that sooner or
l
On 09/09/2018 14:32, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
My point is that in *most* cases -Werror indeed should be removed,
because upstream rarely can keep up with all possible configure,
*FLAGS, compiler versions and arch combinations. But! In some cases
— especially for security oriented software — this f
On 16/03/2020 14:37, Gerion Entrup wrote:
when I compile LLVM for myself, I also always choose SHARED_LIBS simply
because of RAM usage when linking the libraries. In the past, I was not
able to link the single library on my 16 GB machine (I have not tested
it now and this could be dependent on ot
On 13/02/15 00:03, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
We have an overlay that can be used and is used for user contributions.
Any plans to move it to github so we can fork and send pull requests?
On 14/02/15 20:30, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Am Samstag, 14. Februar 2015, 15:38:12 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
On 13/02/15 00:03, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
We have an overlay that can be used and is used for user contributions.
Any plans to move it to github so we can fork and send pull
On 13/02/15 00:03, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
* sorting out the screwed-up bundled library situation
VMware seems to bundle everything they need. Currently, revdep-rebuild
triggers false positives for a library that is no longer in portage
(libgtop-2.0.so.7 from gnome-base/libgtop-2.28.5; it w
Btw, what is the appropriate place to discuss vmware overlay related issues?
On 15/02/15 20:20, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Am Sonntag, 15. Februar 2015, 18:29:25 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
Btw, what is the appropriate place to discuss vmware overlay related
issues?
Best is probably #gentoo-virtualization on freenode.
Any non-realtime place?
Some ebuilds in portage for Qt-based software support both Qt4 as well
as Qt5. Some have "+qt4 qt5" in IUSE, others have "qt4 qt5".
Is there a guideline for this somewhere? If a package needs Qt and thus
lists:
REQUIRED_USE="^^ ( qt4 qt5 )"
but otherwise doesn't prefer one version over the
On 08/03/15 21:35, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On Sun, 2015-03-08 at 21:31 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Some ebuilds in portage for Qt-based software support both Qt4 as well
as Qt5. Some have "+qt4 qt5" in IUSE, others have "qt4 qt5".
Is there a guideline for this som
On 16/03/15 11:58, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 15/03/15 10:15, Ben de Groot wrote:
# These projects have been abandoned upstream. Most mplayer2 devs have moved
# on to media-video/mpv, and users are suggested to do the same. We have
# media-video
On 16/03/15 16:27, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 16 March 2015 at 21:54, Юра Цимбалов wrote:
That would be great, but it depends on getting newer mpv stable, while
(s)mplayer2 is dead and broken right now.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?qu
On 17/03/15 18:29, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-03-17, o godz. 16:55:32
René Neumann napisał(a):
Am 17.03.2015 um 16:33 schrieb Michał Górny:
However, some
users may prefer setting ABI_X86 globally to enable 32-bit libraries
in all packages that support building them. This can be done usin
On 29/03/15 19:24, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-03-29, o godz. 19:14:43
Nikos Chantziaras napisał(a):
On 17/03/15 18:29, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-03-17, o godz. 16:55:32
René Neumann napisał(a):
Am 17.03.2015 um 16:33 schrieb Michał Górny:
However, some
users may prefer setting
On 29/03/15 20:28, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-03-29, o godz. 19:59:19
Nikos Chantziaras napisał(a):
According to emerge --info, ABI_X86 seems to append, not override. In
make.conf:
ABI_X86="32"
Then:
$ emerge --info | grep -i abi_x86
You get:
ABI_X86="32 64&q
On 29/03/15 21:00, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
*/* long list of 433 flags
Yeah, just noticed that I can't split the lines.
I then tried to define an array of USE flags in make.conf:
GLOBAL_USE_FLAGS=( ... )
so that I can then use that array in package.use, but for some reason
make.conf doesn'
Adding overlays with layman is now extremely slow after the overlays
were moved to anongit.gentoo.org. Cloning anything beginning with
"git://anongit.gentoo.org/" is capped at 15KB/s, sometimes 10KB/s.
This is unworkably slow.
Is this intentional?
On 23/04/15 23:01, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 05:11:13PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Adding overlays with layman is now extremely slow after the overlays
were moved to anongit.gentoo.org. Cloning anything beginning with
"git://anongit.gentoo.org/" is capped
"he page you have tried to view (Why Debian returned to FFmpeg) is
currently available to LWN subscribers only."
On 14/07/15 14:12, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
https://lwn.net/Articles/650816/
On Apr 16, 2015 1:51 PM, "Ben de Groot" mailto:yng...@gentoo.org>> wrote:
On 11 April 2015 at 15:
On 19/04/2020 22:47, Michał Górny wrote:
# Michał Górny (2020-04-19)
# Unmaintained. Stuck on Python 3.6. Last release in 2016.
# Removal in 30 days. Bug #718410.
media-video/subliminal
It's an active project. Just not doing releases often. Today 2.1.0 was
released:
https://github.com/
On 06/07/2020 10:48, Xianwen Chen (陈贤文) wrote:
Thank you, Michael and James.
Yes, I plan to submit a nice patch to the Makefile to upstream.
However, I think something is not right on my computer.
I have earlier tried to specify
emake CC="$(tc-getCXX)" prefix="${EPREFIX}/usr" DESTDIR="${D}
101 - 155 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
