On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 00:35 +0100, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
> I offer my help to fix DEPEND/RDEPEND split issues which is causing me
> a lot of headaches (along with localizations).
> For reference, please have a look here: http://planet.sabayonlinux.org/?p=105
I'm another distro builder that uses
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 15:42 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Natanael Copa kirjoitti:
> > While Gentoo is fantasitc to build stuff, the binary packagement has
> > some serious issues. It would be really nice if Gentoo could be better
> > on supporting other binary only package
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 14:48 +0100, Rémi Cardona wrote:
> Natanael and Fabio,
> But a proper bug report is the way to go if you things to move in any
> direction.
Happens once in while i post a patch there
http://tinyurl.com/399gnr
But somethimes you just need to accept we don't live in a perfe
Rémi Cardona wrote:
Natanael Copa a écrit :
But somethimes you just need to accept we don't live in a perfect world.
I understood early that nobody cares that much about binpkgs anyway and
moved on.
I'd say you're mistaken. A lot of people care about binpkg. It's not
b
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 14:34 +0100, Natanael Copa wrote:
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 00:35 +0100, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
I offer my help to fix DEPEND/RDEPEND split issues which is causing me
a lot of headaches (along with localizations).
For reference, please have a
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
We can all agree that Gentoo's binary package support leaves a lot of room for
improvement. But to fix that you need to come up with real solutions and be
prepared to discuss them here and through our bugzilla. And accept the fact
that it will take time... On top of th
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 10:09 +0100, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Natanael Copa wrote:
> > So since I build a distro where size does matter (uclibc) I realised
> > that even if I submit bugs for broken RDEPEND, there will never be an
> > end to those bug reports. Looking at this t
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 10:20 +, Roy Marples wrote:
> Hi List.
>
> I've just removed the code to check for euid when running services and
> instead
> relying on permissions of the service state dir and testing errno. This is a
> good thing, but it does have one side effect.
>
> OpenRC can t
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 12:08 +, Roy Marples wrote:
> On Friday 21 March 2008 10:44:12 Natanael Copa wrote:
> > err... run rc-status as root?
> >
> > I mean if you are not supposed to see if a process is running or not as
> > normal user, then hardned is doin it&#
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 16:23 +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> I'd be happy if some other unpacker is used than lzma-utils - one that
> does not depend on libstdc++ - I'm sure it can be done, heck it's done
> in integrated form in some other projects in less than a couple
> kilobytes of code for the un
On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 20:06 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> Yuri Vasilevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I will be adding some debian build tools to the tree, and would like to
> > create the debtools herd to associate with the packages.
>
> Just please don't add Debian-OpenSSL ;)
lower for people to become a
maintainer.
Personally there are a few packages I could maintain, but I don't think
its worth becomming a developer to just maintain 1 single package.
I think this how the do with the freebsd ports tree. I am maintainer for
1 single freebsd port without being a committer.
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 00:00 +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 17:13 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
>
> > With the increase in developer and project overlays, I see the
> > possibility for reducing work needed to maintain many packages. As
> > Natanael Co
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 09:52 +0300, Alin Nastac wrote:
> Natanael Copa wrote:
> > Nobody has ever showed interest and I'm not pushing my services on
> > anyone.
> >
> Why exactly you don't want to become a Gentoo dev?
Because of the byrocracy? Is it worth it t
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 10:18 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Thursday 05 October 2006 10:06, Natanael Copa wrote:
> > When I submit a fix/version bumb (I submit as "maintainer update") to
> > freebsd ports, its normally committed within hours,
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 00:00 +, Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer wrote:
> Tach Natanael, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
>
> Natanael Copa schrieb:
> > Can I become a Gentoo dev, even if I'm only maintainer of 1-3 packages?
> > I
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 15:47 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 16:39:50 +0200 Natanael Copa
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | I'm initially only interested in maintaining packages where I'm the
> | upstream maintainer as well.
>
> Ick. Rarely a
earlier.
btw.. I keep hearing about this paladius. Is it more script-friendly
than emerge?
--
Natanael Copa
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 16:18 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:24:36 +0200 Natanael Copa
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | btw.. I keep hearing about this paladius. Is it more script-friendly
> | than emerge?
>
> Once we get the Ruby interface fleshed
ng
NEEDED.
I ended up with writing an own package manager that did exactly what i
wanted. (it can install packages from ftp, http, rsync, ssh + local
mounted media - and it "feels" alot like freebsd's pkg_add)
Natanael Copa
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
net-mail/dovecot
net-misc/stunnel
net-nntp/inn
www-servers/nginx
Should I create a bug for every vulnerable package?
>From a binary packagers perspective I would really prefer to create the
certs from init.d script.
Thanks!
Natanael Copa
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 13:29 +0200, Raphael Marichez wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Natanael Copa wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I use the gentoo framework to build binary packages. I noticed that most
> > packages creates the ssl certificate during src_install(). This
edeclared as:
funcname() {
...
}
I mentioned to the vserver list that i was interested to convert the
scripts to POSIX. First he said that he was not against it until he
realized he could no longer use arrays.
http://www.paul.sladen.org/vserver/archives/200708/0025.html
Does anyone have any suggestion to do dynamic variables cleanly without
using arrays?
Natanael Copa
>
> Thanks
>
> Roy
>
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 00:43 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 07:16 Tue 25 Sep , Konstantin Arkhipov (voxus) wrote:
> > voxus 07/09/25 07:16:42
> >
> I take it that, for some obscure reason, use_with() doesn't work?
>
> > if [ ! -f /etc/ssl/${PN}/${PN}.key ]; then
>
> Are
On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 23:30 +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
> On Monday 01 October 2007 22:59:40 Roy Marples wrote:
> > This version, I believe, is more readable and maintainable then the one
> > currently in portage. It also uses a lot less code and has the bonus of
> > being pure sh.
>
> It should be
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 09:29 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 01-10-2007 22:59:40 +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
> > I would like to propse a new versionator.eclass for consideration
> > (attached).
> >
> > This version, I believe, is more readable and maintainable then the one
> > currently in porta
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 05:39 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
> I don't think there is a technical reason to avoid using bash.
Ofcourse there is. See first issue mentioned in BUGS section in bash
manpage.
-nc
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 09:26 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 October 2007, Luca Barbato wrote:
> > Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > in the general case, dash will typically parse faster than bash. but is
> > > this speed gain relevant ? if dash can parse an ebuild in 10% of the
> > > time
On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 21:26 -0600, Joe Peterson wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > Fabian has summed it up nicely, thanks. i could care less what your
> > userland
> > is outside of the ebuild environment since it doesnt matter to ebuild
> > writers. you want a deficient runtime environment, m
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 06:52 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
> On 10/8/07, Natanael Copa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 21:26 -0600, Joe Peterson wrote:
> > > Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > Fabian has summed it up nicely, thanks. i could c
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 20:25 +0100, Steve Long wrote:
> Natanael Copa wrote:
> If you're that motivated why not just start hacking on binary support in
> portage/pkgcore/paludis? There's always open bugs.
I think I did contribute with some patches for qmerge in portage-utils.
On Sun, 2007-10-28 at 06:46 +, Steve Long wrote:
> Failing that, a plaintext config file along the lines discussed in [1] would
> be cool. awk could parse it pretty quickly.
>
> [1] http://modeemi.fi/~tuomov/b//archives/2007/01/20/T11_58_29/
Something like Debian's /etc/network/interfaces?
On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 01:19 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 02-11-2007 17:35:08 +, Roy Marples wrote:
> > I don't see them as inferior.
> > I see them as more portable and less confusing.
>
> Please stop calling it "more portable". The shell code you see in
> configure can in a way be call
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 12:35 -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
> 080128 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > now that the mktemp binary has been moved out of debianutils
> > and integrated straight into coreutils,
> > perhaps it's time to ask how important this package is to everyone.
> > current debianutils is part
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 18:46 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 31 January 2008, Natanael Copa wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 12:35 -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
> > > 080128 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > now that the mktemp binary has been moved out of debi
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 08:54 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 01 February 2008, Natanael Copa wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 18:46 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Thursday 31 January 2008, Natanael Copa wrote:
...
> > > > I can create a bug on this
On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 19:48 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
> What exact time constraints and responsibilities are people afraid of?
> Are those concerns real or just myths?
As someone who just sent in the quiz, yes its real concerns. What scared
me off mostly is the gentoo politics. The entire proce
On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 21:21 -0800, Alec Warner wrote:
> On 3/9/08, Natanael Copa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 19:48 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
> >
> > > What exact time constraints and responsibilities are people afraid of?
&g
38 matches
Mail list logo
