Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?)

2008-05-30 Thread Michal Kurgan
m mostly). > > In C++ it's not abuse. It's using the language as specified and > designed. > Would that be possible for you (or anyone else) to point or provide example of code that breaks after use of as-needed? -- Michal Kurgan http://dev.gentoo.org/~moloh -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] PROPERTIES=virtual for meta-packages (clarification of definition)

2008-08-25 Thread Michal Kurgan
pecify the "virtual" > property separately for different ebuild versions. > Wouldn't it be more appropriate to just move the "offending" ebuilds to virtual category? e.g. virtual/qt, etc. > - -- > Thanks, > Zac -- Michal Kurgan http://dev.gentoo.org/~moloh

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] PROPERTIES=virtual for meta-packages (clarification of definition)

2008-08-25 Thread Michal Kurgan
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 11:01:01 -0700 Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michal Kurgan wrote: > > On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 14:01:48 -0700 > > Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Hi everyone, > >> > >> Since there were some q

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=virtual for meta-packages (clarification of definition)

2008-08-26 Thread Michal Kurgan
its. Could you elaborate on this categories complexity? I think that the idea is to just use already available categories, not implementing additional PROPERTY for this functionality. -- Michal Kurgan http://dev.gentoo.org/~moloh

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Testing is not a valid reason to package.mask

2008-10-04 Thread Michal Kurgan
, but about providing more detailed information in the package.mask file. -- Michal Kurgan http://dev.gentoo.org/~moloh signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package Removal

2006-10-23 Thread Michal Kurgan
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 21:50:52 -0400 "Dan Meltzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think you gave the wrong forum link :) > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-510130.html Myself, i totally agree with that, but now i better escape to my translator cave. -- Michal Kurgan

[gentoo-dev] firefox-2.0

2006-10-28 Thread Michal Kurgan
already? Thanks in advance for any answers. -- Michal Kurgan http://dev.gentoo.org/~moloh signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: firefox-2.0

2006-10-29 Thread Michal Kurgan
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 01:01:50 -0600 Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Did you try, maybe, looking in bugzilla? > Yes. -- Michal Kurgan http://dev.gentoo.org/~moloh signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer: Dawid Węgliński (cla)

2007-04-23 Thread Michal Kurgan
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:58:59 +0300 Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Give him the usual warn welcome, > Welcome aboard. I hope you would like the work for Gentoo ultimate domination! ;-) > Petteri > -- Michal Kurgan http://dev.gentoo.org/~moloh signature.as

Re: [gentoo-dev] wxGTK 2.8

2007-12-21 Thread Michal Kurgan
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 13:31:54 -0600 Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [ ... ] Thanks for all your work with wxWidgets packages. -- Michal Kurgan http://dev.gentoo.org/~moloh -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list