Hello Christian
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 10:13:39PM +0100, Christian Heim wrote:
> devs who contributed/touched the ebuilds:
> - Michael Hanselmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> If no one complains, I'll take this package.
I don't mind if you do that.
Greets,
Michael
--
Gen
Hello Jakub
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 10:33:52AM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
> GTK-based LDAP client. This thing has no maintainer, is broken and dead
> upstream (unmaintained, last release 2+ ago).
I don't think it makes huge sense to keep it, even if it worked for me
for the last three years or so. U
r the inconvenience, but we'd still like yout to test out
this kernel.
-- Linus Torvalds, announcing another kernel patch
# Copyright 1999-2006 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
# $Header: $
# Original Author: Michael Hanselmann <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Hello Patrick
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 06:42:01PM +0100, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> In what range do you need the random numbers?
For this ebuild, lower than 1000.
> And I guess a 32-bit prime is out of reach :-)
Indeed.
Greets,
Michael
--
Gentoo Linux developer, http://hansmi.ch/, http://forkbomb
Hello
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 06:22:00PM +0100, Michael Hanselmann wrote:
> [prime.eclass]
After discussing it with Simon Stelling (blubb), I decided to put the
code into the ebuild directly for now. Since this is experimental stuff,
that's no problem for now. The code will be moved to a
Hello Piotr
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 09:40:28PM +0100, Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
> E_IUSE=${E_IUSE// X } - deletes every X with whitespace around it.
What happens if someone uses newlines, horizontal tabs, vertical tabs or
any other whitespace character instead of spaces? Boom.
Greets,
Michael
--
Hello Alexander
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 04:13:07PM +0100, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> ) is not a valid character in a URL, though - or is it?
According to RFC2396[1], it is:
2.3. Unreserved Characters
Data characters that are allowed in a URI but do not have a reserved
purpose are called unr
Hello Daniel
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 10:32:40AM -0700, Daniel Robbins wrote:
> If people are truly concerned about productivity, then I would expect
> them to support it.
To me it seems that you aren't concerned about productivity, otherwise
you wouldn't top-post. Please stop doing it and learn h
Hello Alec
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 02:41:10PM -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
> > 11:16:24 <@genstef> hansmi: bah fix your qa stuff yourself if you think
> > I am wrong. I wont do something I dont agree with
> I would like to also point out that your quoted irc snippet is very weak
> as there is no exp
Hi Luca
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 01:14:00PM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Workalike client suggested?
After using BitchX for several years, I switch to irssi like 2.5 years
ago. It felt like the most similar client, altough they're a bit
different.
Greets,
Michael
--
http://hansmi.ch/
pgp2G8WM
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:37:11PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
> due to massive code duplication in netqmail, qmail-ldap, qmail-mysql,
> mini-qmail and other 3-rd party applications for qmail i have started
> to move functionality into a first qmail.eclass draft.
I already proposed moving the pri
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 05:37:16PM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
> We are all required to subscribe to this mailing list... Should be easy
> enough to spot the thread.
You know, sometimes I get tired of all the flames and pointless
discussions and mark all mails as read. If something should be read b
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 07:05:51PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
> Actually i am qmail maintainer and also been in the qmail herd for
> quite some time...
No, actually you're in the qmail herd and maintainer of the
net-mail/qmail-ldap package. This doesn't make you a netqmail (the
package I care ab
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 03:04:27PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
> qmail-ldap will not be removed for sure, since i maintain it currently.
Okay, my status there was outdated. We were at least discussing it at
some point in history.
> > And as the netqmail ebuild maintainer, I want the ebuild to be
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 11:22:47AM -0400, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> > > It seems like you aren't interested in communication with the
> > > maintainer, otherwise you would've CC'ed me.
> > Erm? This was completely uncalled for, I'd say?!
To Jakub: It was. Sending such things to a public lis
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 03:07:28AM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
> As it seems, you do not have the time and/or interest to cleanup the
> qmail mess, but don't want anyone to touch (net)qmail ebuilds either, i
> have put the updated ebuilds for qmail and friends into my overlay. [1]
You interpret s
Hello Benedikt
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:37:11PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
> It is basically netqmail split into much smaller chunks so they can be
> reused by other qmail variants as well.
Okay, I looked through it and found some things which need
reconsideration. I agree that user creation
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 10:05:23PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
> > qmail_base_install should be split in smaller functions, maybe with
> > callbacks (if possible in bash).
> There is now qmail_mini_install (called by every qmail ebuild) and
> qmail_{full,man,sendmail}_install for the rest of a fu
Hello Benedikt
Sorry for my long response times.
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 09:58:17PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
> i thought about this, but i'd really like to see things like qmail-spp
> and the gentoo qmail tarball be handled by the eclass, on the other
> hand i agree that unpacking netqmail or
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 01:20:43PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
> Well, i think the unpack stuff could be handled in the ebuild, but i'd
> still like to keep dospp, so ebuilds like vpopmail can install
> spp-plugins in a standardized way..
dospp is fine. Well, maybe rename it to doqmail-spp to mak
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 04:51:17PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
> Yep. Maybe it is also a good idea to make a stand-alone ebuild for the
> qmail-spp plugins in the tarball i have collected, cleaned up and
> tested so far, so we do not need to handle that in the qmail ebuilds..?
That's a great idea
Hi
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 02:12:29PM +0200, Bertram Scharpf wrote:
> Therefore I suppose the slapd daemon tries to obtain passwd/shadow
> information for ldap via nss_ldap.
Yes, it does. Therefore, use something like the following line in
/etc/ldap.conf:
nss_initgroups_ignoreusers root,ldap,c
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 02:09:33PM -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 21:47 Mon 12 Nov , Michael Hanselmann (hansmi) wrote:
> > pkg_postinst() {
> > chown -R inspircd:inspircd "${ROOT}"/etc/${PN}
> > chmod 700 "${ROOT}"/etc/${PN}
> >
Hello
> app-doc/djbdns-man
> net-dns/djbdns
> net-nds/directoryadministrator
I'll look into taking over these if nobody else steps up.
Greets,
Michael
--
Gentoo Linux Developer using m0n0wall | http://hansmi.ch/
Hackers of the world, unite!
pgpF0WY1CFuyU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello
> funnily enough the PHP Guys recommended Apache 1.3 only for a long time.
I've been using Apache 2 and PHP (CGI due to suEXEC) for more than two
years now on a public webserver. It've never expierenced any
instabilities.
Greets,
Michael
--
Gentoo Linux Developer using m0n0wall | http://
Hello Danny
> Let's keep the metadata.xml in each package's directory in _CVS only_.
> Don't propagate them via rsync. Instead, use a script to compile all
> metadata.xml files into one central (XML) file. (This would probably
> need slight changes to the DTD). This file would then be placed into
Hello
> The stuff I removed:
> arch/* except i386 and x86_64
> include/asm-* expect asm-generic, asm-i386 and asm-x86_64
> So I propose we implement a minimal USE flag in the kernel-2 eclass that
> would make the cleaning [...|
The idea isn't too bad, but if you implement it, please do it in a c
27 matches
Mail list logo
