Duncan wrote:
Marien Zwart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 21
Nov 2006 19:36:35 +0100:
Since check_license was (I assume) originally added because it was
required for certain (mostly games) ebuilds: is the possibility to accept
the license by putting a wi
Alexandru Mincu wrote:
> Hi all,
> I don't know if this has come up before so excuse me if I am repeating.
> I recently stumbled upon the following Linux distribution:
> http://www.gobolinux.org/
> They have an idea that Mac OS X implemented it when it first came out to
> be more user friendly.
> T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Binary package mit-scheme has been masked and will be removed from the tree.
Our overlay
has source mit-scheme-c ebuilds which is the C compiler backend.
Marijn
- --
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo ML
<http://www.gentoo.
t; as used here must include 0 (and does by
| the literal ranged definition), and both 0.xx and x.00 are therefore
| defined as allowed, unless there's a further restriction elsewhere that
| hasn't been quoted.
|
"non-negative integer" must've been meant.
- --
Marijn Scho
rwise
customizability is
something of a laugh. Keybindings can be rewired. Simply having the same default
keybindings as emacs does not make a package emacsy.
Seeing as this is an editor and a "GTK+ based simple text editor" I doubt it
has much
claim to emacs-ness.
If my explanation
/\_} instead of ${D}. I could use a sed expression that
doesn't suffer
from this problem (thanks to dleverton):
sed -ne '\_^prefix = /usr/local_!{p;d}' -e "iprefix = ${D}" -i Makefile
Comments?
Marijn
[1]: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217735
- --
Marijn Schou
sions.
Marijn
- --
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo ML
<http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-{lisp,ml} on FreeNode
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkgEyckACgkQp
problems understanding Ciaran's proposal
because of
this and refrain from commenting further.
Distrowatch page rankings are essentially noise. We continue to have between
900 and 1000
users in #gentoo. Try ranking that.
Thank you,
Marijn
- --
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gent
:
SRC_UNPACK_DEP="app-arch/unzip"
SRC_COMPILE_DEP="dev-scheme/bigloo"
SRC_INSTALL_DEP=""
PKG_PREINST_DEP=""
PKG_POSTINST_DEP="cat/b"
RDEPEND="cat/b"
and then cat/b would say:
PKG_PREINST_DEP=""
PKG_POSTINST_DEP=""
RDE
;app-arch/unzip"
|> SRC_COMPILE_DEP="dev-scheme/bigloo"
|> SRC_INSTALL_DEP=""
|
| Labels are a cleaner solution to this. But again, we're discussing
| current EAPIs here.
Labels seems to be another syntax for providing the same information as I
proposed AIUI,
i.e.
f-death. May it last a long time,
Marijn
- --
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo ML
<http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-{lisp,ml} on FreeNode
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http:
arijn
[1]:http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16162#c32
[2]:http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16162#c52
- --
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo ML
<http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-{lisp,ml} on FreeNode
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Albert Zeyer wrote:
| Hi!
[snip]
| So, what do you think?
I think it makes no sense to have a no-server no-gui option, so this just
doesn't map
cleanly to our binary use flag system.
Marijn
- --
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp pr
e are two files that handle people and
their
herds. One XML for saying who is in a herd and one for each herd mail alias on
woodpecker
with a list of developer email prefixes.
Marijn
- --
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo ML
<http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-{l
or
one. I don't
see any reason why this ``new'' libffi should become unmaintained again soon.
Marijn
Relevant bug: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163724
- --
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo ML
<http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-{
gt;
| I want to nominate:
|
| 1. Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
I accept.
| 2. Ulrich Müller (ulm)
- --
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo ML
<http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-{lisp,ml} on FreeNode
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comm
also illegal per current PMS as PV is a read-only
variable. Right now I feel that the gain of having PV read-only (catch a few
bugs?) is much lower than the pain (extensive ebuild-dependend changes when the
version scheme changes). Please comment.
Marijn
- --
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Saturday 28 June 2008 17:03:13 Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
>> PV=${PV/0./}
>>
>> to that new ebuild. This is the cleanest way to do it and doesn't require
>> any variable name cha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marius Mauch wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 15:52:37 +0200
> "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Bo Ørsted Andresen wr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marius Mauch wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:20:06 +0200
> "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Marius Mauch wrote:
&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan wrote:
> "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 29 Jun 2008
> 18:20:06 +0200:
>
>> Why can't portage use its own variables and export these wi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 04:53:06PM +0000, Marijn Schouten (hkbst) wrote:
>> hkbst 08/06/28 16:53:06
>>
>> Modified: ChangeLog
>> Added:reversion.
n the HOMEPAGE
> whether the release was security related, and I assign directly to
> security@ when that is the case (CC'ing the package's maintainers) and
> perhaps pasting ChangeLog or advisory info in a comment.
Marijn
- --
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 10:21:50AM +0000, Marijn Schouten (hkbst) wrote:
>> hkbst 08/07/05 10:21:50
>> Added:drscheme-4.0.2.ebuild
>> Log:
>> bump
>> (Portage
s become a barrier to the ability to change
> a category easily and without losing the history.
>
> -Joe
Marijn
- --
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo ML
<http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-{lisp,ml} on Free
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 18:34:46 +0200
> "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I suppose you mean git. Since it tracks content and not files, moves
>> are trivial. Git actual
ependency required by "world" [argument])
>
> So, what seems to be the problem?
>
> Is it my system configuration or is it a portage issue?
Both of those versions are no longer in the main tree. I suggest you sync again
and that should do it.
These kinds of questions aren
it be
> "templatized" like most licenses ?
>
> Thanks,
> Mounir
>
That paste is gone/expired.
Marijn
- --
Sarcasm puts the iron in irony, cynicism the steel.
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo ML
<http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-{
developers no
longer working on Gentoo.
I might even argue that Funtoo is one big overlay. When your own ability to
contribute directly depends on an overlay, then why are you arguing against
other people's overlays?
Marijn
- --
Sarcasm puts the iron in irony, cynicism the steel.
Marijn Schoute
overlays.
Marijn
- --
Sarcasm puts the iron in irony, cynicism the steel.
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo ML
<http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-{lisp,ml} on FreeNode
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla
lement are what are costing you
respect.
>> But you'll get to be part of the
>> development process and you'll get to work with the things you care
>> about.
>
> you mean I'll be part of 'a' development process and work on some of
> the thing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> The problem of ebuilds in one overlay not seeing ebuilds in another overlay,
> would also be solved by the package manager NOT failing to
> see/notice/use/allow
> ebuilds from all installed overlays. Then
you imply that if you decide to not, that you wouldn't be able
to "to talk to people to understand something". I just want to stress that this
is not so. Many of us are available on #gentoo-dev-help and this mailing list
for technical questions.
Marijn
[1]:http://xenoterracide.blogs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Caleb Cushing wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
> wrote:
>> "right now you are the kind of person that thinks being a volunteer is a
>> privilege and not a responsibility. You think that bec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Caleb Cushing wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
> wrote:
>> Why do you think they should?
>
> you must have not read what I said on that bugtracker because I'm
> thought I was pretty clea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Caleb Cushing wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
> wrote:
>> Don't you get that?
>
> the janitor gets hit by a car and no ones around to clean the
> bathrooms. You can't fire him because
t; upset over getting pushed out.
>
> The problem comes when $idle_dev has XX bugs assigned to them and they
> don't get resolved and no one else knows that there are issues.
As opposed to those same bugs being assigned to maintainer-needed and getting
lots of attention?
Marijn
- --
group !OSI. That way the infos would be there, even
though they would still need to be extracted by some tool.
> Comments? :)
Done! ;)
> Luke
>
> P.S. I'm subscribed to -nomail, so if your reply is directed specifically to
> me or you want to ensure I read it, feel free to CC.
k ugly as hell but they should work.
>
> In a nutshell, don't use the xorg-x11 meta.
Do you mean:
1) don't use the xorg-x11 meta if you don't want not-completely-free fonts
or
2) don't ever use the xorg-x11 meta
?
Marijn
- --
Sarcasm puts the iron in irony, c
ould be RDEPEND="").
+#RDEPEND="${DEPEND}"
Why not make it simple and require RDEPEND to be defined?
Marijn
- --
Gods do not want you to think, lest they lose existence.
Religions do not want you to think, lest they lose power.
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gen
istence.
Religions do not want you to think, lest they lose power.
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo ML
<http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-{lisp,ml} on FreeNode
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozil
these issues it seems completely useless
to me.
Marijn
- --
Gods do not want you to think, lest they lose existence.
Religions do not want you to think, lest they lose power.
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo ML
<http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-{lisp,ml} on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Torsten Veller wrote:
> * "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" :
>> Torsten Veller wrote:
>>> # Masked for removal (#151986,#171649,#239222) (23 Mar 2009)
>>> # 151986 - dev-lang/pugs-6.2.13 installs stuff in /lib instead of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
>> Furthermore a lot of our patches are in the sed format and I happen to think
>> that's a good thing.
>
> My current view is that "sed patches" should o
to think, lest they lose power.
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo ML
<http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-{lisp,ml} on FreeNode
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev
enabling tests and hoping somebody
> has run them during testing.
You conclusion that developers do not run tests is based on nothing. Using
RESTRICT=test is not a fix and just hides the problem, so it is not unthinkable
that packages with failing tests get to stable.
Marijn
- --
If you ca
ed. This is clearly a hack.
I know I personally asked for mtime preservation on 7-5-2008 on this list[1] and
the issue has surely existed even longer. Let's get rid of this problem already.
Thanks,
Marijn
[1]:http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/55953
- --
If you cannot read
ways? That's just like having
a genuine face-to-face conversation. Are those bad too? To be avoided at all
costs? What problem are we solving here again?
Marijn
- --
If you cannot read my mind, then listen to what I say.
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo ML
<http://w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
� wrote:
> # R�mi Cardona (09 May 2009)
> # XPrint is dead, long live XPrint
For kings I understand this comment, but can you explain how it applies to
XPrint?
Thanks,
Marijn
- --
If you cannot read my mind, then listen to what I say.
isn't unique to Ruby. Common Lisp, chicken, plt-scheme, Scheme,
Haskell and Perl (and many more probably) each have repositories of
libraries/applications plus some sort of package manager to install and keep
track of them. Is there a general solution? Is it possible to redirect calls
ICS, but have very broad choices in how much we want to bleed.
IMO this is a different issue than having supposedly popular ebuilds not in main
tree.
I think there is a steady inflow of fresh developers from sunrise (and other
places). Does anyone have a chart? I'd also like to know from prospect
gt; inherit versionator
>
> if version_is_at_least 2 ; then
> EAPI="2"
> else
> EAPI="0"
> fi
>
> Besides, if we were able to do what your code does, we'd just code it
> natively, not use external programs.
How
could be a package name though.)
> The case you mention can be avoided with another restriction in PMS.
> Buut we might as well go all the way and change the version separator
> to -- or something, which would be the most flexible.
That would also be a good solution though we don't se
ell them. What else are news items for?
As long as we provide an upgrade path from version X_years_old to version
X_days_old via versions A, B and C, I think we have done our part. In fact we
already had one such situation with bash and portage.
Marijn
- --
If you cannot read my mind, then listen
956
> @OSI-APPROVED 23284
> @other 5998
> @total 30549"
>
> Thanks for reading,
> Mounir
I always thought that @OSI-APPROVED would be a proper superset of @FSF-APPROVED,
but these numbers say otherwise.
Marijn
- --
If you cannot read my mind, then listen to what I say.
Marijn
a fan of NOT obtaining PN and PV from the filename. I've
> seen an approach like this used in various systems and I happen to like it:
In which systems did you see this approach?
Marijn
- --
If you cannot read my mind, then listen to what I say.
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp proje
are also intending this to work? If not, why?
Marijn
- --
If you cannot read my mind, then listen to what I say.
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo ML
<http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-{lisp,ml} on FreeNode
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Ver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
>> Sebastian Pipping wrote:
>>> I start to understand the real benefits of moving a larger
>>> part of the maintenance down to the distro level as you proposed.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexandre Buisse wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 22:58:11 +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
>
>> Now that agriffis retired, this package is orphaned and has quite a
>> couple of stale bugs... Anyone interested, please see this link:
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/26
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I was wondering what is keeping us from releasing a minimal install cd more
often than we do now.
Isn't almost everything needed for it already in the stable tree and thus
tested? And if so isn't
it possible to fully automate generation of these cd's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> Also, what's the point? Everything you use to install from the minimal
> is fetched from the internet. The only thing that an updated minimal
> would give us is a slightly more hardware support during the install.
This slightly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
.Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> No, I'm just the one who isn't yet sufficiently jaded by the whole
> "people who don't know what PMS is jumping in and trying to derail it"
> thing to have given up discussing it in public yet.
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> i consi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ryan Hill wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
>> I was kicked for suggesting that a) ppc-macos was breaking the tree,
>> staffed by people who don't know what they're doing, a QA nightmare and
>> damaging to the project, b) that pathspec was vapourware
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
See tracker bug (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163921).
guile-1.8 may go stable soon because of a security bug in gnucash (bug 167706).
I think all blocking bugs which are still open, can be fixed by either adding
use flag detection or depend
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> no, i'm not directing this at any one person as i dont believe singling out
> any one person addresses anything in our case
>
> a video sent to out by a good mate
> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4216011961522818645
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> I have no plans on releasing *any* kind of nightly *anything* so
> long as Release Engineering still gets minimal testing from only a
> *tiny* subset of our developer pool when we are basically *begging* for
> it.
I've been w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Long wrote:
> George Prowse wrote:
>
>> Stephen Bennett wrote:
>>> I'd rather make it known that that sort of backhanded tactics to get rid
>>> of someone you don't like won't work whoever uses them.
>>>
>> You would certainly make that point
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Long wrote:
> Mauricio Lima Pilla wrote:
>> We are always ready to listen to feedback and constructive criticism, but
>> your constant trolling against the forums can't be classified as such.
>>
> IMO ciaran has definitely been trolling this list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marius Mauch wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:25:17 -0400
> "William L. Thomson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hierarchy would be the following
>>
>> snapshot -> dev -> build -> alpha -> beta
>
> And that's where the problems start. As you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeff Rollin wrote:
> On 18/03/07, Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Jeff Rollin napsal(a):
>> > On 18/03/07, Piotr Jaroszyński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> On Sunday 18 of March 2007 13:37:55 Jeff Rollin wrote:
>> >> > Also, if you have a .co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 10:30:56 +1200
> Christopher Sawtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> There are plenty of ways of doing that, most of which don't involve
>>> the huge cost of having to use a horrible version control system...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 07:58:59 -0400
> Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Please, everyone, go back and read the actual *facts* that were
>> discovered using copies of *our* repositories before going around
>> using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 11:52 +0200, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
>> So in light of all that I don't think it is wasteful to restart this
>> discussion.
>
> I do.
>
> Want to bring it bac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthias Langer wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 09:06 +0200, Rob C wrote:
>
>
>> Its obviously not, Many users are reporting file-collisions on a
>> weekly basis. So either this isn't sufficient or the arch teams are
>> not acting as you describe.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There seemed to be still some doubt as to the benefits of distributed SCMs.
Fortunately Linus himself, at a talk at Google a few weeks back, explained the
benefits of being distributed and said fun and interesting things about git
and other source code
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Doty wrote:
> Perhaps you should go take a long walk off a short pier.
> [snip]
> Oh, I'm so hurt. You think I'm a hypocrite. Man, what will I ever do?
> Newsflash, I know I'm a hypocrite, which is a lot better than the
> childish passive-aggres
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi list,
I'd like to inform you about goings on in Scheme territory.
BEGIN INTERMEZZO
For those who've never heard of Scheme: Scheme is a modern minimal Lisp
programming language.
For those who ask themselves why on Earth people want to put up with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thilo Bangert wrote:
> is a herd1300
These seem intentional. Is there anything wrong with it?
Marijn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
cilly wrote:
> well, I wouldn't bring up this discussion if there aren't any problems.
Hi Cecilia,
perhaps you could go into some more specifics of these problems?
Which packages were removed and were they stable, testing or masked at the
time of rem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Richard Freeman wrote:
> One thing that I noticed is that in many cases there are multiple
> testing versions of a package available, and one stable version. So, if
> you run unstable you can pick and choose, but if you're running stable
> (which in t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
cilly wrote:
> please, understand that I do not want to `blame` any developer, unless
> it is discussed here with a final solution. Since I am not a gentoo-dev,
> some of the devs `may not understand` my concerns and probably `feel
> offended`.
Hi Cec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Gustavo Felisberto wrote:
>> Any alternatives?
>
> Drop it from stable completely, possibly package.mask or move to
> overlay. Why should this closed-source rootkit be in stable?
++
Marijn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Versi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John R. Graham wrote:
> What I'd really like to be able to code is a range with an AND operator,
> something like this
> ( && >=some-cat/foo-4.0 =some-cat/foo-4.0
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD4DBQFGclz1p/VmCx0OL2wRAuxMAJY2sDo/FpEqRN3DPk3DkCGM5p++A
Hi list,
I've encountered a few cases where the build process requires building and
installing something and then using that to build something else. Is there a
standard way to do this?
Marijn
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi list,
I think it would be good if packages.g.o would link to sources.g.o and vice
versa. Interconnecting these sources of information would make them more
valuable. I thought it was obvious so I opened
[http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181655
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
# Marijn Schouten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (14 May 2007)
# masked for removal, use >=dev-scheme/drscheme-360-r2
# without X use flag instead
dev-scheme/mzscheme
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using G
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
> 1) Should third party values be allowed?
I'm sorry, but I have no idea what `third party values' are.
> At first glance I have only found
> multilib.eclass, which is using "multilib-pkg-force". Imho no, it can use
> some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
> On Sunday 01 of July 2007 11:05:24 Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
>> I'm sorry, but I have no idea what `third party values' are.
>
> ./multilib.eclass: if hasq multilib-pkg-force ${RESTRICT}
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vieri Di Paola wrote:
> The two software packages depend at run-time.
then they can simply RDEPEND on eachother. The package manager should do the
right thing.
Questions like this one are best asked in #gentoo-dev-help IRC channel,
Marijn
-BEGIN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A grep '!!' /usr/portage/profiles/use.desc reveals the following:
bootstrap - !!internal use only!! DO NOT SET THIS FLAG YOURSELF!, used during
original system bootstrapping [make stage2]
build - !!internal use only!! DO NOT SET THIS FLAG YOURSELF!, u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so
> -mike
- From the topic of #emacs: "glibc2.6 currently breaks emacs, use gli
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What about moving Gentoo stuff to `GPLv3 or later'?
Marijn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGkMS4p/VmCx0OL2wRAmkvAKDJCYN0B/i7Pxyg1rDPCVeaSQxZAwCfQeb0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Heim wrote:
> The following packages need some love and/or a new maintainer:
> - dev-lang/swig (lang-misc herd ?)
will take this if no-one else wants it,
Marijn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Grant Goodyear wrote:
> Not-so-coincidentally, Gentoo's been invited to
> join the Software Freedom Conservancy.
For those like me who don't already know who these people are. As you can read
here [http://www.softwarefreedom.org/services/] under Non-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
joshua jackson wrote:
> Jakub Moc wrote:
>> Petteri Rýty napsal(a):
>>> Or just do it via package.use in profiles until IUSE defaults are
>>> implemented.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Petteri
>> As noted before, they are implemented, just not allowed in the tr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Petteri R�ty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> I did see anything in devmanual taking a stance on this issue:
>> http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/variables/index.html
>> What do you think about adding a sentence or two
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Petteri Räty wrote:
> Marijn Schouten (hkBst) kirjoitti:
>> Perhaps we should just move DESCRIPTIONs to metadata. That would make it
>> impossible to use ${PV} and more importantly also remove some duplication.
>
>
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stratos Psomadakis wrote:
> i'm a bit confused...
> i have the same problem...
> i try to make an upgrade and it says that pidgin is going to be rebuilt
> without the msn use flag(althoug i have enabled the use flag for
> pidgin,in /etc/portage/package
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
my point though wasnt to knock ati (although it was fun), the point was that i
do not believe any closed source driver in our tree should ever be grounds
for preventing stabilization of a kernel ebuild
so next time dsd (or whoever the ninja kernel
>>> $ xsltproc gentoo-metadata-herds.xsl /path/to/metadata.xml
>>> base-system someherds
>>> $ xsltproc gentoo-metadata-maintainers.xsl /path/to/metadata.xml
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> -mike
>>>
>> Sure... be fancy with all your xs
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
