On Sunday 11 January 2009 01.06.45 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:03:17 -0600
>
> Ryan Hill wrote:
> > I'm really hoping this isn't a stable candidate. :P
>
> Is an earlier gcc 4.3 a stable candidate, or have those plans been
> abandoned?
>
> (I'm wondering whether it's worth the
On Sunday 11 January 2009 04.26.00 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 10 January 2009 19:03:17 Ryan Hill wrote:
> > On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:22:50 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > not to be out done, gcc-4.3.2-r3 will include changes like some other
> > > distros are now carrying:
> > > - the -Wfo
On Sunday 11 January 2009 09.39.08 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 10 January 2009 23:52:15 Magnus Granberg wrote:
> > On Sunday 11 January 2009 04.26.00 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Saturday 10 January 2009 19:03:17 Ryan Hill wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 10 Jan 2009
fredag 6 oktober 2017 kl. 14:23:49 CEST skrev Andreas K. Huettel:
> Hi all,
>
> Since gcc-6 stabilization is drawing closer, I'm going to prepare the
> remaining 17.0 profiles (right now they only exist for amd64).
>
> Meaning... copy profiles/default/linux/*/13.0 to profiles/default/linux/*/
>
måndag 9 oktober 2017 kl. 22:58:22 CEST skrev Andreas K. Huettel:
> =
> Title: New 17.0 profiles in the Gentoo repository
> Author: Andreas K. Hüttel
> Posted: xxx
> Revision: 1
> News-Item-Format: 2.0
> Display-If-Installed: >=sys-devel/gcc-6.4.0
>
> We h
onsdag 14 februari 2018 kl. 19:44:13 CET skrev Paweł Hajdan, Jr.:
> I was looking into the new 17.0 profiles (nice work!), and noticed the
> hardened one is marked as dev. I'm somewhat concerned about switching to
> that on my laptop (I'm currently using hardened/linux/amd64).
>
> Is there someth
Hi
The patch add use flag for pch, so it can be disable.
We add support to use the configure options for pie and ssp
instead of the -D* hack for it.
The hardened use flag will add or remove some compile options as,
-fstrict_overflow will be turn of for -O2 and higher,
-fstack-check is added as def
fredag 2 december 2016 kl. 23:32:37 CET skrev Daniel Campbell:
> On 12/02/2016 06:09 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
> > On Friday, December 02, 2016 02:10:27 PM Michał Górny wrote:
> >> Hi, everyone.
> >>
> >> I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects being
> >> started by individuals in
Hi
Gcc 6.X update:
Gcc 6.3 will soon get released in one or two weeks on that the pie use flag
will get unmasked and gcj will be masked for java is removed in gcc 7
Package that fail with the pie flag needed to get fixed upstream for we are not
the only dist that use it now days.
Gcc 5.X update
måndag 23 januari 2017 kl. 13:56:02 CET skrev Rich Freeman:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 4:23 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > I've written a short proposal that aims to provide basic infrastructure
> > for defining mix-in profiles in Gentoo. I've tried to keep it simple,
> > and backwards compatible. Th
tisdag 03 september 2013 22.41.14 skrev Alan McKinnon:
> I *do* like colorized text on my terminal, but I do believe we ought to
> keep defaults sane - the minimum that could possibly work. Everything
> extra should be optional
What about NOCOLOR="false" in make.conf see man make.conf for mo
onsdag 11 september 2013 00.07.29 skrev Ryan Hill:
> On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 18:41:34 -0400
>
> Richard Yao wrote:
> > A few thoughts:
> >
> > 1. The kernel expects -fno-stack-protector to be the default. What will
> > the effect be on kernel configuration once -fstack-protector is the
> > default?
onsdag 11 september 2013 04.49.55 skrev Duncan:
> (Tho jer points out that the parisc arch, among others, won't work with
> that flag at all, and warns to that effect. So I guess the patch will
> etiher be ifdeffed not to apply on such archs or will be conditionally
> applied in the first pl
måndag 09 september 2013 21.00.12 skrev Ryan Hill:
> On Mon, 9 Sep 2013 08:21:35 -0400
>
> Rich Freeman wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 8:06 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > > So does anyone have any objections to making -fstack-protector the
> > > default?
> > > Now is the time to speak up.
> >
> >
make_gcc_hard() the default for all Gcc versions 4.8 and newer, and turn
it on or off with hardened_gcc_works() that will make some sanity checks.
/Magnus
2013-12-31 Magnus Granberg
# 484714
We Add -fstack-protector as default
--- a/eclass/toolchain.eclass 2013-12-30 21:21:05.431832881 +0100
torsdag 09 januari 2014 22.57.09 skrev Pacho Ramos:
> El jue, 09-01-2014 a las 21:58 +0100, Magnus Granberg escribió:
> > Hi
> >
> > Some time ago we discussed that we should enable stack smashing
> > (-fstack-protector) by default. So we opened a bug to track thi
torsdag 09 januari 2014 23.18.28 skrev Ryan Hill:
> On Thu, 09 Jan 2014 21:58:46 +0100
>
> Magnus Granberg wrote:
> > Some time ago we discussed that we should enable stack smashing
> > (-fstack-protector) by default. So we opened a bug to track this [1].
> > The a
torsdag 09 januari 2014 17.56.56 skrev Ryan Hill:
> On Thu, 09 Jan 2014 21:58:46 +0100
>
> Magnus Granberg wrote:
> > - use hardened && make_gcc_hard
> > + if ( tc_version_is_at_least 4.8 || use hardened ) && ! use vanilla ;
> > then
>
>
tisdag 10 juni 2014 14.22.11 skrev Jeroen Roovers:
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 21:46:56 -0600
>
> Ryan Hill wrote:
> > Yes. But now you've got me worried. We have to build gcc itself with
> > -fno-stack-protector. Does compiling something with that flag give
> > an error on hppa? Maybe give 4.8.2-r
torsdag 12 juni 2014 03.45.23 skrev Greg Turner:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> > Will bug #332823 and its ilk somehow be mitigated? Emerging glibc with
> > -fstack-protector still leads to similar problems. There doesn't
> > currently seem to be a bug report about thi
at thay need
for help or join #gentoo-hardened @ freenode.net
And the hardened-sources in the hardened-development overlay have some
regreesions that we are working on to fix.
Sorry if i bing roude.
Hardened at gentoo.org
Magnus Granberg (Zorry)
On Tuesday 05 October 2010 18.52.29 Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 10/05/2010 02:32 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> > I was just looking at some random ebuilds recently, and noticed this
> > snippet in gcc-4.5* ebuilds:
> >
> > SSP_STABLE="amd64 x86 ppc ppc64 arm
> > # uclibc need tls and nptl support
Hi
Was thinking to post a news item for the hardened profile about the new GCC
4.4.4-r2 that have been stabled on x86 and amd64.
Hardened at gentoo.org
/Magnus (Zorry)
Title: Info on GCC 4.4.4-r2 and GCC 3.X on Hardened profiles
Author: Magnus Granberg
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2010
On Sunday 24 October 2010 02.44.00 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Il giorno dom, 24/10/2010 alle 02.28 +0200, Magnus Granberg ha scritto:
> > You may have noticed that GCC 4.4.4-r2 has gone stable on x86 and
> > amd64. The other archs will follow later. We have enable SSP support
&g
On Sunday 24 October 2010 10.04.34 Kfir Lavi wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 3:34 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> > Magnus Granberg posted on Sun, 24 Oct 2010 03:01:40 +0200 as excerpted:
> > > Display-If-Install: >
> > Ty
On Sunday 24 October 2010 12.04.13 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> >>>>> On Sun, 24 Oct 2010, Magnus Granberg wrote:
> > Display-If-Installed:
> If I understand portage's logic correctly, then this header will not
> work. But you can use Display-If-Installed for t
On Sunday 24 October 2010 19.00.44 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
> On 10/23/10 20:28, Magnus Granberg wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Was thinking to post a news item for the hardened profile about the
> > new GCC 4.4.4-r2 that have been stabled on x86 and amd64.
>
> Thank you for
torsdag 20 oktober 2011 13.17.33 skrev Mike Frysinger:
> On Thursday 20 October 2011 12:47:27 Rich Freeman wrote:
> > I was trying to draw a contrast between passive things like
> > stack-protection and things that really get in your face like MAC.
>
> the trouble was in the context quoting then
fredag 21 oktober 2011 15.25.54 skrev Duncan:
> Mike Frysinger posted on Fri, 21 Oct 2011 08:13:22 -0400 as excerpted:
> > On Thursday 20 October 2011 23:20:35 Duncan wrote:
> >> Magnus G suggests possibly adding PIE to amd64, which is already PIC,
> >
> > this isn't quite right. amd64 shared ob
Hi
As some of you may know, I have been working on code for a tinderbox with
frontend support. I think its time to move it to a offcial project.
The Proof-Of-Concept (poc) is almost ready, but it still have alot of the
frontend left to do. You can see the logs and summit bugsreports and
chose
30 matches
Mail list logo
