Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2017-04-27 Thread Luis Ressel
On Thu, 27 Apr 2017 12:58:23 +0200 Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > I also want to drop the following: > > - dev-lang/erlang It'd be great if whoever takes over maintainership of erlang could also take care of dev-util/rebar. Dirkjan is currently proxying it for me, but I don't use it anymore. (In fact

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] News item: GCC 6 defaults to USE="pie ssp"

2017-05-10 Thread Luis Ressel
;ve never had any issues compiling vanilla-sources with my hardened gcc. Regards, Luis Ressel pgpcIzUTAKWA0.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/

2017-05-21 Thread Luis Ressel
ng them if there's already an update pending? I'm generating metadata locally. There are changes to some of the more important eclasses roughly every other week; and after such a change, the regen takes 10-25 minutes on my hardware. I don't understand your question (3). Regards

Re: [gentoo-dev] The status of grsecurity upstream and hardened-sources downstream

2017-06-26 Thread Luis Ressel
27;t encountered any problems after switching on my own hosts. Just keep in mind that vanilla-sources doesn't support the PaX xattrs properly (AFAIR), so if you ever want to switch *back* from vanilla to hardened, some pax markings will be missing. This shouldn't be an issue for

[gentoo-dev] Package up for grab: dev-util/rebar

2017-11-22 Thread Luis Ressel
o this, there are no open bugs. @aidecoe: CC'ing you as the maintainer of rebar.eclass. Cheers, Luis Ressel

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 67 is in, please update your metadata.dtd!

2016-01-25 Thread Luis Ressel
27;t a member of the portage group. By the way, the herds.xml file is still available at https://api.gentoo.org/packages/herds.xml and can probably be removed from there as well. -- Regards, Luis Ressel

Re: [gentoo-dev] New USE_EXPAND NGINX_MODULES_STREAM

2016-02-08 Thread Luis Ressel
pcre * nginx_modules_http_image_filter -> gd Introduce new USE flags for the remaining few modules -- voilĂ , there you go, no need for a new USE_EXPAND and the users will even get a useful set of default modules enabled based on their global USE flags. -- Luis Ressel

Re: [gentoo-dev] New USE_EXPAND NGINX_MODULES_STREAM

2016-02-08 Thread Luis Ressel
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 11:34:12 +1300 Kent Fredric wrote: > nginx_modules_http_lua? ( !luajit? ( dev-lang/lua:0= ) luajit? > ( dev-lang/luajit:2= ) ) This should of course also be changed to the global 'lua' useflag. Currently, you're even mixing NGINX_MODULES and normal USE flags here for m

Re: [gentoo-dev] New USE_EXPAND NGINX_MODULES_STREAM

2016-02-08 Thread Luis Ressel
t? > Because NGINX is monolithic, but its sources are aggregated from a > bunch of different authors for some fun reason, sort of like having a > `linux-kernel` ebuild with a SRC_URI for every single vendor name ( > *barf* ) > > I really do not envy the nginx maintainer. > Me neither. @mrueg or whoever's the maintainer: Thanks for sparing the rest of us from this insanity. :) Regards, Luis Ressel

Re: [gentoo-dev] New USE_EXPAND NGINX_MODULES_STREAM

2016-02-09 Thread Luis Ressel
USE's this way matters very much. If enable geoip or ldap in my make.conf, I expect packages with optional geoip/ldap support to enable this support. Also, if you wish to document this mapping in more detail, that's exactly what we have the tags in metadata.xml for. You can even write whole sentences in there! :) Regards, Luis Ressel

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Bug #565566: Why is it still not fixed?

2016-02-24 Thread Luis Ressel
t Changelogs are trying to avoid. -- Regards, Luis Ressel pgpq6zs8rkL_V.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal for changes for the next EAPI version

2016-05-16 Thread Luis Ressel
package has been merged? -- Regards, Luis Ressel Luis Ressel GPG fpr: F08D 2AF6 655E 25DE 52BC E53D 08F5 7F90 3029 B5BD pgpBC7jG9HFAG.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal for changes for the next EAPI version

2016-05-17 Thread Luis Ressel
erefore, I think we'd be better off providing such tests out-of-band (test plans in the wiki), or perhaps stuffing them into pkg_config(). Don't get me wrong, I'm not at all opposed to your idea of easing the ATs' life, I'm just not convinced of the neccessity of EAPI change

[gentoo-dev] Commit signing for metadata/* repos

2017-01-07 Thread Luis Ressel
repos, too. (I don't really care about dtd and xml-schema, but for the other two, I think this would make much sense.) Currently, it looks like commits to xml-schema aren't signed at all, all commits to glsa are signed, and commits to the other two repos are partly signed. Regards, Luis Ressel

Re: [gentoo-dev] Commit signing for metadata/* repos

2017-01-08 Thread Luis Ressel
obably notice after a while). At the same time, I don't see any disadvantages to requiring commit signatures; does anyone else? Regards, Luis Ressel

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo GPG key policies

2013-02-20 Thread Luis Ressel
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:27:46 + "Robin H. Johnson" wrote: > 3. Dedicated Gentoo signing subkey What's the point of this, btw? Luis signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo GPG key policies

2013-02-20 Thread Luis Ressel
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:37:38 + "Robin H. Johnson" wrote: > Ideally keeping your primary key offline to increase security. > > However, the original theory was that if there was some attack that > required a large amount of ciphertext or a targeted plaintext input, > you would be limiting the

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo GPG key policies

2013-02-27 Thread Luis Ressel
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 17:10:56 +0700 (NOVT) gro...@gentoo.org wrote: > Hello *, > I am stuck and have many questions. > [In the process of becoming a dev, I've generated a gpg key, of course. It > vwas on an old notebook. When I switched to a newer notebook, I forgot to > copy it, because I don't

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2013-03-23 Thread Luis Ressel
On Sat, 23 Mar 2013 10:52:00 +0100 Martin Dummer wrote: > If I manage one day to achieve the gentoo dev status then I am willing > to pick up maintainership of > > > app-laptop/nvidiabl > > but until then? What about proxy-maintainership? Luis signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up

2013-12-14 Thread Luis Ressel
ase is not directly comparable with virtual/mta: We've got this for other packages to depend on it, at least that is my understanding. In a case like this, a handbook entry should suffice. Luis Ressel signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: new global USE flag "srcdist"

2014-01-02 Thread Luis Ressel
On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 11:10:54 -0500 Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > ..or we could just do this, using the existing RESTRICT="mirror" > that's already in ebuilds -- have a DISTDIR and a NODISTCACHEDIR, > NODISTCACHEDIR defaults to DISTDIR; if RESTRICT="mirror" then > distfiles are saved to NODISTCACHEDIR

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: new global USE flag "srcdist"

2014-01-02 Thread Luis Ressel
On Fri, 3 Jan 2014 05:37:33 +1300 Kent Fredric wrote: > Fair point. I was more seeing a pattern emerging and exploring where > that might lead. > > Though I figure it a useful distinction for convenience sake. > > Consider if you wanted to archive some files to make a subsequent > gentoo instal

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: new global USE flag "srcdist"

2014-01-02 Thread Luis Ressel
On Thu, 2 Jan 2014 17:53:45 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > RESTRICT is somewhat complementary to LICENSE and cannot provide as > much information. Especially, RESTRICT="mirror" doesn't say under > what license the restricted pieces are, and doesn't allow for > ACCEPT_LICENSE filtering. But is thi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: new global USE flag "srcdist"

2014-01-02 Thread Luis Ressel
On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 12:13:47 -0500 Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > RESTRICT="fetch" requires the user to do their own fetching; since > they're doing that, it should be pretty obvious that the distfile is > restricted somehow. Of course, they are still able to do whatever > they want, but I expect any

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: storing predefined INSTALL_MASK directory lists in repos

2014-01-11 Thread Luis Ressel
I've got an additional proposal: It would be interesting if this feature could also make use of the LINGUAS var for selectively filtering /usr/share/man and and /usr/share/locale, as most ebuilds don't respect this variable natively. -- Luis Ressel GPG fpr: F08D 2AF6 655E 25DE 52BC

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: storing predefined INSTALL_MASK directory lists in repos

2014-01-11 Thread Luis Ressel
uplication of information, but if it eases the implementation, that shouldn't be much of a problem. But imho it'd be nice if this approach didn't require a separate config entry for each language (that'd be 233 entries). -- Luis Ressel GPG fpr: F08D 2AF6 655E 25DE 52BC E

Re: [gentoo-dev] [OT] pkgcore bikeshed (was Portage team)

2014-01-13 Thread Luis Ressel
less the same time. > > Determinism results in more or less the same time, that's correct; > proper benchmarks would show you a similar result. I guess he means that the (according to the file sizes) extensive caching doesn't seem to be of much use. -- Luis Ressel GPG fpr: F08

Re: [gentoo-dev] [OT] pkgcore bikeshed (was Portage team)

2014-01-13 Thread Luis Ressel
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:46:08 +0100 Tom Wijsman wrote: > On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:38:59 +0100 > Luis Ressel wrote: > > > On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:58:13 +0100 > > Tom Wijsman wrote: > > > > > Half a minute if you disable backtracking which you don't need

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] gnome2-utils.eclass: Fix SELinux labeling issue in gnome2_gdk_pixbuf_update()

2014-02-07 Thread Luis Ressel
EROOT}usr/$(get_libdir)/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache" + cp -f "${tmp_file}" "${EROOT}usr/$(get_libdir)/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache" && + rm "${tmp_file}" # don't replace this with mv, required for SELinux support e

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2014-04-09 Thread Luis Ressel
On Wed, 09 Apr 2014 22:34:07 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote: > mail-filter/bogofilter If no dev wants it, I'll proxy-maintain it. Regards, Luis Ressel signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2014-04-09 Thread Luis Ressel
On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 22:48:55 +0200 Luis Ressel wrote: > On Wed, 09 Apr 2014 22:34:07 +0200 > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > > mail-filter/bogofilter > > If no dev wants it, I'll proxy-maintain it. Okay, that's obsolete now that johu stepped up... Regards, Luis Res

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: enabling ipc-sandbox & network-sandbox by default

2014-05-13 Thread Luis Ressel
at all to run a separate postgres instance (upstream is explicitly supporting it), I'd strongly recommend doing so even with network-sandbox being disabled. -- Regards, Luis Ressel signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: enabling ipc-sandbox & network-sandbox by default

2014-05-15 Thread Luis Ressel
er, even with network-sandbox being enabled such behaviour would still constitue a major bug which would be fixed by the devs. So yes, network-sandbox (and same goes for ipc-sandbox) is mainly a debugging aid for developers which will help them spot such problems more easily. -- Regards

Re: [gentoo-dev] local repo kernel ebuild search for tar.bz2 instead of tar.xz

2014-06-26 Thread Luis Ressel
The kernel-2.eclass calls epatch_user, so AFAIK you don't have to create a local ebuild copy in order to patch the kernel, just drop your patches in /etc/portage/patches/sys-kernel/hardened-sources/. Regards, Luis Ressel signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: USE flags in virtuals, to allow a specific provider to be determined

2014-07-25 Thread Luis Ressel
such a virtual, why not just let him do it? Regards, Luis Ressel signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: USE flags in virtuals, to allow a specific provider to be determined

2014-07-25 Thread Luis Ressel
" The following REQUIRED_USE flag constraints are unsatisfied: heimdal? ( !mit-krb5 ) mit-krb5? ( !heimdal )" " might be a bit confusing to some people, and remember that constraint string would grow much longer if there were more providers, as grows quadratically. Regards, Luis Ressel signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-libs/x265: x265-1.0.ebuild ChangeLog x265-1.2.ebuild x265-0.8.ebuild

2014-07-30 Thread Luis Ressel
th the original workflow. Okay, perhaps package.masking - is a bit uncommon and clutters package.mask, but it's not all *that* bad and it eases the workflow. Regards, Luis Ressel signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-libs/x265: x265-1.0.ebuild ChangeLog x265-1.2.ebuild x265-0.8.ebuild

2014-07-30 Thread Luis Ressel
t; media-libs/xine-lib or sys-fs/udev ebuilds does > > (It just seemed this was unclear to some replying in this thread.) > > - Samuli > > Thanks for the clarification. This approach seems to be the optimum. Regards, Luis Ressel signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] News item: sys-apps/s6 ftrig ABI change

2019-03-11 Thread Luis Ressel
ABI change Author: Luis Ressel Poste

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: qa last rites -- long list

2015-01-09 Thread Luis Ressel
On Thu, 8 Jan 2015 09:16:36 -0600 William Hubbs wrote: > Rich is correct, maintainers are no longer bound by the games team > policy. > I didn't know this. If that's the case, I'd like to proxy-maintain nethack. I'll try and prepare the neccessary

Re: [gentoo-dev] Figuring out the solution to in-network-sandbox distcc

2015-01-21 Thread Luis Ressel
able rules in the netfiler FORWARD chain to ensure only distcc gets through 4) Set up SNAT or MASQUERADE in netfilter's nat table 5) There you go! This is beautiful because is doesn't require any userland proxies, but of course, it would be difficult to set up in an automated fashion. So my proposal would be just to stay with the status quo, and document the above in the wiki for those who really want to use both network-sandbox and distcc despite the hassle. Regards, Luis Ressel

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-emulation/fig

2015-02-26 Thread Luis Ressel
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 10:13:14 -0600 Alex Brandt wrote: > # Alex Brandt (21 Feb 2015) > # Upstream renamed to docker-compose for all future releases > app-emulation/fig > Wouldn't a pkgmove be the better way to handle this? -- Luis Ressel GPG fpr: F08D 2AF6 655E 25DE 52B

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2015-02-22 23:59 UTC

2015-02-28 Thread Luis Ressel
theanfire IIRC, just one or two months ago several of the sys-firmware/iwl*-ucode packages were lastrited with the recommendation of using sys-kernel/linux-firmware instead. So why are we adding new firmware ebuilds now? The iwl7625 firmware seems to be in linux-firmware, too. Regards, Luis Ress

Re: [gentoo-dev] Policies for games dirs, new group "gamestat" for sgid binaries

2015-02-28 Thread Luis Ressel
sensible security feature for which implementations are available, for example grSecurity's TPE) -- well, then the GCC won't be of any help for the attacker, because he can't execute the compiled binary. Not that it matters. :) -- Luis Ressel GPG fpr: F08D 2AF6 655E 25DE 52BC

[gentoo-dev] Non-fast-forward push to gentoo repository

2015-10-23 Thread Luis Ressel
repo, they were overwritten by cbb7cfa sys-kernel/tuxonice-sources: Version bumps. Was this intended? If not, @nerdboy: You might want to commit these changes again. Regards, Luis Ressel

Re: [gentoo-dev] ssl vs openssl vs libressl vs gnutls USE flag foo

2015-10-30 Thread Luis Ressel
sasl, it uses gdbm if both gdbm and berkdb use flags are enabled), but for ssl, we might want to specify "REQUIRED_USE = ^^ (..)" so it's possible to use USE dependencies in order to avoid namespace conflicts. If there's no REQUIRED_USE, "somelibrary[libressl]" might be satisfied even though somelibrary is actually linked to openssl. -- Regards, Luis Ressel

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLogs: Digest verification failed

2015-11-12 Thread Luis Ressel
place of forcing a regen of the Manifests > after the ChangeLogs for the moment. > Why on earth are the ChangeLogs tracked in the Manifest at all? Aren't they auto-generated by the rsync mirrors these days anyway? Manifests are nice for DIST files, but tracking ChangeLogs seems a bit useless to me. Regards, Luis Ressel

Re: [gentoo-dev] Herd up for grabs: gpe

2016-01-17 Thread Luis Ressel
Only x11-libs/libfakekey and x11-libs/libxsettings-client are still unmasked; both of them have additional maintainers, so nothing will have to go to maintainer-neeeded@ when the GPE herd is disbanded. By the way, x11-libs/libxsettings-client doesn't have any revdeps and looks like it could be removed along with the other GPE stuff. libfakekey still has some revdeps, though. -- Luis Ressel