sk.
For the time being and near future, I think moves should be done by hand.
What are your thoughts on this, infra?
1: http://dev.gentoo.org/~port001/DevTools/epkgmove/
Regards,
Ian Leitch
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> Currently pam stuff (implementations, modules) are organized in the worst way
> I ever seen.
> Most of them are in sys-libs, some of them in app-admin, other in app-crypt,
> pam_smb in net-misc and so on.
>
> I thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sven Wegener wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I'm writing this mail to bring you a thought we had over on freenode in
> the #gentoo-portage channel. We would like to split up src_compile. The
> new src_configure should just do the econf part and src_compile shoul
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
| The new categories are x11-apps, x11-proto and x11-drivers. Of these,
| the name for x11-proto (the protocol headers) is debatable. The upstream
| module they're all in is called "proto," and their pkg-
For those of you who like having only a small amount of USE flags
defined in make.conf along with -*, keeping package.use updated (as to
not break --newuse, etc) can be a laborious task (assuming you even
bother in the first place).
Portage isn't supposed to touch users configuration files, so
I think myself and tester are the only members who can be considered
active at the moment. I'm happy with creating an arch team, though I
don't think we'll end up with an abundance of members (x86 is far from
the most popular arch among devs).
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
So would just making an x
hparker are
interested in possibly recruiting a few able fellows.
Regards,
Ian Leitch
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
