Hey!
Maybe I am missing something, but why not use difflib and pygments on
top of that?
Cheers, Domen
On Sun, 2010-05-30 at 10:59 -0400, Christopher Harvey wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello gentoo-dev,
>
> I'm working on an app for GSoC that needs to show a dif
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05/30/10 11:21, Domen Kožar wrote:
> > Hey!
> >
> > Maybe I am missing something, but why not use difflib and pygments on
> > top of that?
> >
> > Cheers, Domen
> >
>
> That's a good option.
> Pros:
> Can easi
> The current python eclass also uses some vars to specify the supported slots,
> yes, but it is more
> complex and harder to maintain in addition to the fact, that the dependency
> part is hidden from the
> package manager.
>
> I dont think, that you can tell portage with the current implementa
On Sun, 2010-06-06 at 14:41 +0200, Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Am 06.06.2010 13:50, schrieb Domen Kožar:
> >> And if you add a python slot or remove one, portage currently is not able
> >> to see that and to
> >> reinstall packages, which had modules installed for tha
Greetings, I'm working on g-pypi2 project over this summer for Gentoo,
and among other things, I learned a lot about how Gentoo handles Python
package distributions.
There are quite some students working on distutils2 implementations, so
I thought Gentoo as source distribution has a lot to say how
http://xkcd.com/386/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
This should probably be updated:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-amd64-faq.xml#flash
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 15:58 +0200, Angelo Arrifano wrote:
> On 18-06-2010 12:16, Alec Warner wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 2:08 AM, Lars Wendler
> > wrote:
> >> Am Freitag 18 Juni 2010, 03:42:29 schrie
Clear reference for usnig git http://gitref.org/
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 07:56 +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 07:31:07 +0200
> "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
>
> > I'd rather have git soon with longer, but acceptable outage, than in
> > the future, with a very small outage.
>
> I'
As some of developers noticed, current gpypi2[0] implementation (tool
for querying Python Package Index to create ebuilds) needs root
permissions for two reasons:
- to write ebuild in overlay managed by layman
- to unpack source for setup.py introspection with "ebuild foobar
unpack"
It just seems
Just wondering, why did you abuse classes that badly and hack way
through optparse? If it limits your needs you might want to take a look
at argparse.
Domen
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 14:48 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 08:32:07 +0100
> Torsten Veller wrote:
>
> > If nobody is inte
10 matches
Mail list logo
