Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Next draft will propose being able to append .read to a filename
> to mark it read without deleting it.
But don't use ".read", as it can be understood as both present tense
(imperative) and past tense. Better use something like ".seen".
Benno
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org m
Curtis Napier wrote:
> I'm especially interested in feedback from anyone who uses
> accessibilty programs such as screen readers or if you are color
> blind or have any other accessibilty issues.
Not being blind or otherwise visually handicapped, but I use rather
large letters (18 pixels), do not
Klaus-J. Wolf wrote:
> http://www.seismic.de/gentoo/gentoo_mask_proposal.html
>
> * Manually keyword unmasking an ebuild, automatically means
> unmasking the last one in the line of masked versions.
No. Use the "=" to unmask a specific version only. For example:
=sys-apps/findutils-4.2
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 24 May 2006 15:48:00 -0400 Mark Loeser
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | At long last the devmanual is official. You can find it at
> | http://devmanual.gentoo.org. [...]
>
> [...]
>
> Your treatment of the Authors list that used to be on the main
> page is at best
Stephen Bennett wrote:
> "at a minimum such credit will appear where any other comparable
> authorship credit appears and in a manner at least as prominent
> as such other comparable authorship credit."
Precisely. So the Authors section on the main page should look
something like:
Ciaran McCr
Stuart Herbert wrote:
>* Developers and Users Guides online [2], [3]
>
> [3] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/overlays/usersguide.xml
Without the "s":
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/overlays/userguide.xml
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Steve Dibb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> > See the little "D"?
> >
> > It's not big, it's not fat, but it's warning you. :)
>
> Not actually an eye-catching.
>
> To be fair, do *you* actually look through *all* the emerge
> output if there's any "D" flag, without the risk
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> * If no existing file with the intended target name exists, or if
> the existing file has identical content to the file to be
> installed, the file to be installed is installed as normal.
I would much prefer new files to be treated as if replacing an
existing zero l
Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 19:47 +0200, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> > Ideally the package manager would unconditionally respect the
> > config protection area, and it should be up to tools like
> > etc-update to (configurably) automerge new files and iden
Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
> I think that protection against harmfull new config files should
> be selective to be useful. It should only affect directories
> from which files are blindly sourced by some services you are
> already running. There, and only there¹, new config files are
> une
Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> I know I've seen many instances where the word INVALID has got
> peoples hackles up, [...] This is the same issue I have with
> "NOTABUG" - it's like saying, "you're wrong, shouldn't have raised
> the report", just perhaps not as in-your-face as INVALID.
Precisely. "NOT
Juergen.Schinker wrote:
> Bryan Østergaard schrieb:
> > It's with a bit of sadness but also a bit of relief that I'm
> > finally retiring from
> > Gentoo.
Aj! kloeri! No!
> i want you to stay, you are important for Gentoo
>
> but what can I do
Bribe him!
Benno
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing li
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. Also, do not reply via email to the
> person whose email is mentioned below. To comment on this bug,
> please visit:
Please consider lowercasing the first sentence, to stop the yelling,
and removing the repetition from the second sentence, whi
13 matches
Mail list logo
