Hey all,
lmctl's upstream is dead, and its fork is now called lomoco (supporting
new mice etc)
I have masked lmctl and if noone objects it will go away in the next two
weeks or so..
Cheers!
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
gt; > +# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v 1.9378
> > 2009/01/10 21:41:41 hollow Exp $
> > #
> > # When you add an entry to the top of this file, add your name, the date,
> > and
> > # an explanation of why something is getting masked. Please
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 06:27:40PM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Hi Arches,
>
> I started to move some files matching *2005* in experimental/ where they
> were obviously obsoleted by something else, however I'd like I hand in
> files that are no longer needed on the mirrors.
>
> Please reply t
Hi all,
currently I am the only active developer in the apache herd, but
quite busy with work and life, so I'd like to ask all of you to fix bugs
assigned to apache-bugs@ if you come across them/if they annoy you etc,
since i cannot keep up with bugs currently. I'd also like to see more
active mem
# Benedikt Böhm (5 Jul 2009)
# superseded by www-apache/mod_authn_pam, #222159
# removal: 31 Aug 2009
www-apache/mod_auth_pam
pgpKmSVGoic58.pgp
Description: PGP signature
All,
i'm not using rabbitmq-server except as a dependency for
app-admin/chef and i've no interest or time to fix it. Feel free to
take it.
Regards,
Bene
Due to limited time and resources these packages are up for grabs:
- app-shells/shish
- dev-db/mysqltuner
- dev-libs/dietlibc
- dev-libs/gecode
- net-analyzer/bwm-ng
- net-analyzer/nagios-check_mysql_health
These packages have been reduced to herd maintainers:
- media-libs/libraw
- media-libs/ge
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:27 AM, Michael Weber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to drop one strong suggestion about configuration management
> that might be beneficial here: use version control software!
>
> Some machines (esp. those with shared administration) have /etc/portage
> under git [1] with
>
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Michael Weber wrote:
> I wonder if anybody uses unattended [backup+]emerge as cron job.
> I'm really temped to do so, but with users relying on these machines I'm
> always chicken-out.
>
i've refrained from doing unattended upgrades for a long time, but i'm
quite
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Michael Weber wrote:
> On 01/18/2013 09:28 AM, Benedikt Böhm wrote:
> > but - and that's quite important i guess - i only use my own clone of
> > the portage tree which i sync from time to time and i also keep
> > different versions stab
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Benedikt Böhm wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Michael Weber wrote:
>
>> On 01/18/2013 09:28 AM, Benedikt Böhm wrote:
>> > but - and that's quite important i guess - i only use my own clone of
>> > the portage tree w
On Monday 03 July 2006 19:49, Nick Devito wrote:
> Looking at the number of virtualization-related packages (xen, openvz,
> and related packages) that are in portage, and the increasing complexity
> of these packages (which means more problems, as usual), I'm suggesting
> that a Virtualization herd
Mon, 2006-07-03 at 21:48 +0200, Benedikt Böhm wrote:
> > On Monday 03 July 2006 19:49, Nick Devito wrote:
> > > Looking at the number of virtualization-related packages (xen, openvz,
> > > and related packages) that are in portage, and the increasing
> > > complex
On Monday 03 July 2006 22:28, Benedikt Böhm wrote:
> On Monday 03 July 2006 21:56, Nick Devito wrote:
> > Okay, in that case, extend the vserver herd to include a larger range of
> > virtualization stuff, including Xen, Bochs, and so on. It just seems
> > more fitting to
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 14:48, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 21:09 -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
> > I'm open to arguments in favor of such a project, tho, if people have
> > real plans. Certainly, an easier way to generate and maintain root
> > filesystems for UML would be n
Hi all,
the current behaviour of the apache ebuild -- chosing built-in modules based
on /etc/apache2/apache-builtin-mods -- is very aweful, especially for binary
packages.
Therefore, i would like to add APACHE2_MODULES and APACHE2_MPMS to USE_EXPAND.
I have already converted the ebuild in my l
On Saturday 24 November 2007 20:42:01 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
> 2007-11-24 19:51:23 Benedikt Böhm napisał(a):
> > the current behaviour of the apache ebuild -- chosing built-in modules
> > based on /etc/apache2/apache-builtin-mods -- is very aweful, especially
On Thursday 29 November 2007 09:46:01 Josh Saddler wrote:
> Josh Saddler wrote:
> > Benedikt Böhm wrote:
> >
> > If this goes through, please look over our existing apache-related
> > documentation and file a bug with any necessary changes.
>
> I updated our doc
As previously announced apache-2.0 support ends as of 31-12-2007 and will be
masked (together with apr{,-util}-0*) end of january.
A tracker bug exists at https://bugs.gentoo.org/203578
Greets,
Bene
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
+# Benedikt Böhm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (12 Jan 2008)
+# Masked for apache-2.0 removal, bug #203578
+dev-cpp/cppserv
+=dev-libs/apr-0*
+=dev-libs/apr-util-0*
+=dev-util/subversion-1.3*
+=www-servers/apache-2.0*
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
+# Benedikt Böhm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (03 Feb 2008)
+# Masked for removal in 30 days wrt #208584
+# Does not use webapp/depend.apache eclass correctly
+# Obsoleted by =www-apps/gallery-2*
+=www-apps/gallery-1*
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Michael Higgins wrote:
> Yes, PORTDIR default location under /usr was a totally stupid thing.
> Please don't repeat it...
One thing all you /usr naggers forget is, that /var cannot be shared
read-only via nfs (or bind mounts in case of virtual servers). most
singl
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 12:55 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> On 01/16/10 23:46, Benedikt Böhm wrote:
>> One thing all you /usr naggers forget is, that /var cannot be shared
>> read-only via nfs (or bind mounts in case of virtual servers).
>
> Why is that? Please tell mo
Hi all,
i'd like to add NGINX_MODULES to USE_EXPAND. If there are no
objections i will commit it end of the week.
Thanks,
Bene
ifference between http-modules and mail-modules.
>
> Cheers,
> Tiziano
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 04.03.2010, 21:27 +0100 schrieb Benedikt Böhm:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> i'd like to add NGINX_MODULES to USE_EXPAND. If there are no
>> objections i will commit it en
Hi!
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 4:30 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> There are quite a few bugs open for it plus the latest version (1.50.18)
> is not even in Gentoo but on SourceForge only.
The release on sourceforge is not compatible with the current
implementation in Gentoo AFAIK.
> So your first
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:43 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> Solution
>
> 1) Add two new packages to the tree:
> - app-admin/geolizer (/usr/bin/geolizer)
> - app-admin/webalizer-xtended (/usr/bin/webalizer-xtended)
>
> 2) Bump webalizer to 2.21 while
> - no longer applying either feat
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 of March 2010 07:52:28 Benedikt Böhm wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 4:30 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
>> > There are quite a few bugs open for it plus the latest version (1.50.18)
>> > i
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Angelo Arrifano wrote:
> Hello developers developers and developers,
>
> Ever wondered how much crap is left in your X-years old Gentoo box?
>
> I just developed a python utility to efficiently find orphaned files in
> the system. By orphaned files I mean the files
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, Michał Górny wrote:
>> William Hubbs wrote:
>> > What about newnet. Should we keep it at all? If we do, should we put
>> > it behind a use flag which would be off by default?
>>
>> I insist on keeping it as
Hi!
due to work and family related time shortage i'm not able to lead the
apache team any longer and have removed myself from the herd. there
are a lot of open bugs, many of them results from the various
autotools/libtool hacks added by upstream. any help is appreciated i
guess and a new apache te
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 4:59 AM, Stuart Longland wrote:
> - revdep-rebuild (handles packages broken by soname changes, etc)
solved by preserved-libs in portage-2.2
> - python-updater (handles Python module rebuilds after upgrading Python)
> - perl-cleaner (handles Perl module rebuilds after upgr
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> So I know a bunch of people have already looked at it, and I'd like to
> know: what do you find better about the Ruby approach compared to the
> Python approach? Is it just the size of python.eclass, or are there a
> number of other issues?
33 matches
Mail list logo
