Re: [gentoo-dev] Unmasking dev-python/setuptools 0.6_alpha5?

2005-11-12 Thread Anders Bruun Olsen
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 10:01:33PM -0600, Edward Muller wrote: > Anyone know how safe/unsafe dev-python/setuptools-0.6_alpha5 is? I am > building > an ebuild for Turbogears and a current version of setuptools is required. Just in case you haven't seen it, you should take a look at http://eggs.ge

Re: [gentoo-dev] Timezone /etc/conf.d/clock

2007-02-15 Thread Anders Bruun Olsen
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 08:01:11AM -0500, Caleb Cushing wrote: > which most probably aren't since that was changed in the handbook > (wonders why it was). It might have something to do with the fact that FHS specifies that /usr does not have to be on the root partition and thus using a symlink in

[gentoo-dev] Ebuild versioning problems

2005-07-12 Thread Anders Bruun Olsen
Hi, I am working on an ebuild for open-iscsi (linux-iscsi-5.0.0.0.3rc6-363) and would like to know what the best way of dealing with that totally insane versionnumber is. Right now I have the ebuild named linux-iscsi-5.0.0.0.3_rc6363.ebuild and then set $MY_PV and $MY_P manually. Is there a better

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ebuild versioning problems

2005-07-13 Thread Anders Bruun Olsen
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 08:51:42AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > I am working on an ebuild for open-iscsi (linux-iscsi-5.0.0.0.3rc6-363) > > and would like to know what the best way of dealing with that totally > > insane versionnumber is. > > Right now I have the ebuild named linux-iscsi-5.0.0.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ebuild versioning problems

2005-07-17 Thread Anders Bruun Olsen
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 11:47:14AM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > I absolutely agree, but I am not associated with them in any way and > > therefore am not in a possition to convince them to reconsider their > > versioning policy (unfortunately). > Why not just ask them? I've found that some p

[gentoo-dev] Python setuptools/eggs

2005-10-07 Thread Anders Bruun Olsen
Hi, I wanted to try out the new and fabled TurboGears and found that it uses the new python software distribution tool setuptools and is distributed as python eggs. I can easily install it with setuptools/easy_setup, but I wanted to make an ebuild for TurboGears, which is not just so with setuptoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python setuptools/eggs

2005-10-09 Thread Anders Bruun Olsen
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 03:45:18PM -0700, Rob Cakebread wrote: > >How should Portage handle this? > I've been working on an eclass for these but its not ready. > I was hoping it'd be as easy as the Ruby gems eclass, because > they are similar, but eggs don't play nicely in a sandbox yet. But aren'