> On Wed, 28 Feb 2024, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-02-27 at 21:05 -0600, Oskari Pirhonen wrote:
>> What about cases where someone, say, doesn't have an excellent grasp of
>> English and decides to use, for example, ChatGPT to aid in writing
>> documentation/comments (not code) and puts
On Tue, 2024-02-27 at 15:45 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Given the recent spread of the "AI" bubble, I think we really need to
> look into formally addressing the related concerns. In my opinion,
> at this point the only reasonable course of action would be to safely
> ban "AI"-backed
Also removes unused eclass variable JAVA_ANT_DISABLE_ANT_CORE_DEP which
becomes obsolete by removal of old dev-java/ant-core-1.10.9-r5.
Signed-off-by: Volkmar W. Pogatzki
---
eclass/java-ant-2.eclass | 14 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/java-a
But where do we draw the line? Are translation tools like DeepL
allowed? I don't see much of a copyright issue for these.
I'd also like to jump in and play devil's advocate. There's a fair
chance that this is because I just got back from a
supercomputing/research conf where LLMs were the hot t
On 27/02/2024 18:24, Hank Leininger wrote:
On 2024-02-27, andrewammerlaan wrote:
Until recently, sys-apps/debianutils was in turn pulled in by
app-misc/ca-certificates, an essential package installed on many
systems. This is no longer the case.[2]. As a result many users may find
that sys-apps/
On Wed, 2024-02-28 at 11:08 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, 28 Feb 2024, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2024-02-27 at 21:05 -0600, Oskari Pirhonen wrote:
> > > What about cases where someone, say, doesn't have an excellent grasp of
> > > English and decides to use, for example,
On 27/02/2024 16.45, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Given the recent spread of the "AI" bubble, I think we really need to
> look into formally addressing the related concerns. In my opinion,
> at this point the only reasonable course of action would be to safely
> ban "AI"-backed contribution e
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 1:50 PM Arthur Zamarin wrote:
>
> I know that GitHub Copilot can be limited to licenses, and even to just
> the current repository. Even though, I'm not sure that the copyright can
> be attributed to "me" and not the "AI" - so still gray area.
So, AI copyright is a bit of
On 2/28/24 6:06 AM, Matt Jolly wrote:
>
>> But where do we draw the line? Are translation tools like DeepL
>> allowed? I don't see much of a copyright issue for these.
>
> I'd also like to jump in and play devil's advocate. There's a fair
> chance that this is because I just got back from a
> sup
Hi Patrick,
The salt ebuild has been refactored to remove the tests and modules that
require dev-python/boto, and the mask has been removed.
Salt has a lot of users, and it would be doing them a disservice to
remove it from the tree.
Salt is not trivial to distribute, because upstream wants
10 matches
Mail list logo
