This always has the same meaning in packages - build in annotations to help
with e.g. custom memory allocators to reduce noise and improve Valgrind's
accuracy.
All invalid uses of this were already fixed (cases where it was used to control
running the testsuite under Valgrind which we don't want
# David Seifert (2023-05-14)
# EAPI 6, last release over 20 years ago, no other distro packages this
# anymore. Removal on 2023-06-13.
dev-tex/cpp2latex
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sonntag, 26. Dezember 2021 11:10:45 CEST John Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 25, 2021, 5:19 AM Marek Szuba wrote:
> > On 24 December 2021 08:48:08 UTC, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > >> > I think “secret” may be too generic and “libsecret” is not ideal in
> > >> > case an implemention comes along that i
This was discussed already in 2021. Going to be used by 30+ packages.
Description:
"Enable support for freedesktop.org Secret Service API password store"
See also:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/905928
https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/31035
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed me
# David Seifert (2023-05-14)
# QA and build issues, EAPI 6, no proper releases, no other
# distro packages this. Removal on 2023-06-13. Bug #713794, #872539.
dev-vcs/cvsync
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Andreas Sturmlechner writes:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> This was discussed already in 2021. Going to be used by 30+ packages.
>
> Description:
> "Enable support for freedesktop.org Secret Service API password store"
>
> See also:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/905928
> https://github.com/gento
On Sun, 2023-05-14 at 09:26 +0100, Sam James wrote:
> This always has the same meaning in packages - build in annotations to
> help
> with e.g. custom memory allocators to reduce noise and improve
> Valgrind's accuracy.
>
> All invalid uses of this were already fixed (cases where it was used
> to
Sam James writes:
> This always has the same meaning in packages - build in annotations to help
> with e.g. custom memory allocators to reduce noise and improve Valgrind's
> accuracy.
>
> All invalid uses of this were already fixed (cases where it was used to
> control
> running the testsuite
Does enabling USE=valgrind impact runtime performance in any way?
dum., 14 mai 2023, 19:46 Arsen Arsenović a scris:
>
> Sam James writes:
>
> > This always has the same meaning in packages - build in annotations to
> help
> > with e.g. custom memory allocators to reduce noise and improve
> Valg
Alexe Stefan writes:
> Does enabling USE=valgrind impact runtime performance in any way?
A very small amount because it adds a check at runtime for whether
the application is running under Valgrind. The compiler may be able
to optimise this a bit if it can determine it's unlikely (if the
Valgri
Sam James writes:
> Alexe Stefan writes:
>
>> Does enabling USE=valgrind impact runtime performance in any way?
>
> A very small amount because it adds a check at runtime for whether
> the application is running under Valgrind. The compiler may be able
> to optimise this a bit if it can determi
On 04.05.23 20:59, Maciej Barć wrote:
R.i.p. to a lot od desktop users on non-state-of-the-art HW.
Building Chromium inside a cloud VM may be an option for some users with
older hardware. When using e.g.
https://github.com/hartwork/binary-gentoo for that, the VM doesn't even
have to run Gen
12 matches
Mail list logo
