Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] glep-0076: Require real name instead of legal name

2022-07-13 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2022, Robin H Johnson wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 02:26:43AM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> The "natural person" part was lost in this change. It also doesn't >> reappear in the added section below. I think we don't want any corporate >> entities there (or at least that'

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH data/dtd] metadata.dtd: Add nimble remote-id type

2022-07-13 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2022, Michał Górny wrote: > On Wed, 2022-07-13 at 09:16 +0500, Anna Vyalkova wrote: >> Add remote-id for packages from the official Nim package list (can be >> accessed e.g. via https://nimble.directory), only packaged in ::guru at >> the time this was committed. > Please als

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 83: EAPI deprecation

2022-07-13 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2022, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > Please find below the first draft of GLEP 83 "EAPI deprecation". > This tries to define criteria for deprecation and for banning of EAPIs > by the Council. > I have tried to model it in a way that the actual dates for at least > EAPIs 4 and 5 are

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH data/dtd] metadata.dtd: Add nimble remote-id type

2022-07-13 Thread Ionen Wolkens
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 09:26:53AM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Jul 2022, Michał Górny wrote: > > > On Wed, 2022-07-13 at 09:16 +0500, Anna Vyalkova wrote: > >> Add remote-id for packages from the official Nim package list (can be > >> accessed e.g. via https://nimble.directory)

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 83: EAPI deprecation

2022-07-13 Thread Arthur Zamarin
On 13/07/2022 11.12, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Mon, 11 Jul 2022, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > So, any opinions? Should we go for the longer transition time (and make > overlay maintainers happy), or for a shorter time so that we can tidy up > eclasses sooner? > > Ulrich My personal take on

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 83: EAPI deprecation

2022-07-13 Thread Sam James
> On 13 Jul 2022, at 19:50, Arthur Zamarin wrote: > > On 13/07/2022 11.12, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>> On Mon, 11 Jul 2022, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> >> >> So, any opinions? Should we go for the longer transition time (and make >> overlay maintainers happy), or for a shorter time so that we