On Saturday, July 31, 2021 4:56:34 PM PDT Sam James wrote:
> This adds two tmpfiles related QA checks:
> 1) Verify packages don't install tmpfiles to /etc/tmpfiles.d, which
> is a deprecated location;
>
> 2) Check whether packages inherit tmpfiles.eclass if they're
> installing files to /usr/lib/t
On Mon, 2021-08-02 at 01:28 -0700, Georgy Yakovlev wrote:
> it can actually check if ebuild calls tmpfiles_process, not only
> inherit.
> something like:
>
> local pkg_postinst_body="$(declare -fp pkg_postinst)"
> if [[ ! ${pkg_postinst_body} == *tmpfiles_process* ]]; then
> eqawar
On Monday, August 2, 2021 1:30:07 AM PDT Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-08-02 at 01:28 -0700, Georgy Yakovlev wrote:
> > it can actually check if ebuild calls tmpfiles_process, not only
> > inherit.
> > something like:
> >
> > local pkg_postinst_body="$(declare -fp pkg_postinst)"
> > i
Last-rite these packages in addition to dev-cpp/libxsd-frontend, seeing
that only it needs them and they're abandoned upstream too.
dev-cpp/libcutl
dev-util/build
> On Sun, 01 Aug 2021, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> If EAPI support is really needed in the profiles, it seems like there
> has to be a better mechanism to codify it in a more central location
> versus scattering ~390 of the things across the base profiles
> directory.
I have filed https://bugs.gen
On Sun, Aug 1, 2021 at 5:54 PM Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
> Quoting ciaranm [1]:
>
> | > "EAPIs whose value starts with the string paludis- are reserved for
> | > experimental use by the Paludis package manager."
> |
> | Don't tell anyone, but that's mostly just in there because some people
> | insis
