> On Thu, 22 Oct 2020, Aisha Tammy wrote:
> and remove 'xdm' from the default runlevel and add 'display-manager':
> rc-update del xdm default
> rc-update add display-manager default
So, no automatic upgrade path for users? I am asking again, what is the
rationale for renaming?
I
# Michał Górny (2020-10-23)
# Committed with missing patch mid-2018. Not fixed since.
# Removal in 30 days. Bug #653310.
games-arcade/ceferino
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
# Michał Górny (2020-10-23)
# Needs a dedicated maintainer. The current version fails to build.
# Needs a version bump.
# Removal in 30 days. Bug #614408.
games-strategy/megaglest
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
# Michał Górny (2020-10-23)
# Fails to build. Needs a dedicated maintainer and a version bump.
# Removal in 30 days. Bug #635592.
games-strategy/asc
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 10/23/20 3:50 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020, Aisha Tammy wrote:
and remove 'xdm' from the default runlevel and add 'display-manager':
rc-update del xdm default
rc-update add display-manager default
So, no automatic upgrade path for users? I am asking aga
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2020, Aisha Tammy wrote:
> I could run these commands conditionally in postinst to make this
> an automatic upgrade for people who have 'xdm' currently installed and
> enabled in the default runlevel.
> But I really don't think that running these commands is that big an
> inc
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2020-10-23)
# Depends on deprecated QtWebKit with no work towards QtWebEngine port at all.
# Bug #688850, security bug #744199. Removal in 30 days.
media-video/shotcut
media-libs/webvfx
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
