# Andreas Sturmlechner (2020-01-12)
# Merged into dev-util/kdevelop months ago, unusable standalone
# Removal in 10 days.
dev-util/kdevelop-clang-tidy
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2020-01-12)
# Unmaintained upstream and redundant. Use Night Color functionality built
# into Plasma 5.17 instead, without needing x11-misc/redshift.
# Removal in 30 days.
kde-misc/plasma-redshift-control
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2020-01-12)
# Unmaintained upstream and redundant. Use media-sound/audex instead.
# Removal in 30 days.
media-sound/kaudiocreator
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
# Michał Górny (2020-01-12)
# Backport to Python 2.4 - 2.6. Not needed by anything.
# Removal in 30 days. Bug #705256.
dev-python/ordereddict
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
# Michał Górny (2020-01-12)
# libcxxrt is no longer maintained upstream. It used to be needed to
# maintain ABI in Gentoo/FreeBSD but that is no longer supported. Plus,
# FreeBSD maintains their own fork anyway. sys-libs/libcxxabi (from
# LLVM upstream) is the suggested replacement (but it's no
A few ebuilds use bash '[[ ${foo} < ${bar} ]]' comparison to compare
numbers and package versions.
In bash '<' is for lexicographical string comparison (see man bash
'CONDITIONAL EXPRESSIONS' section). It's almost never what
you want:
$ [[ 1.2.3 < 1.2.3 ]] && echo yes || echo no
no # ok
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2020-01-12)
# Ancient, blocks x11-libs/gtkglext cleanup, open bug #649066
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
dev-cpp/gtkglextmm
sci-misc/repsnapper
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2020-01-12)
# Unmaintained upstream and redundant. Use kde-apps/kamera instead.
# Only revdep of ancient media-libs/qimageblitz. Removal in 30 days.
media-video/kamerka
media-libs/qimageblitz
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
upstream has give up this project,
upstream is not interressted on any patches to fix this
If you really would like to stay on this plugin,
add a comment in this bug
wrt bug 704004
pmasked for removal ~12 Feb 2020
--
Joerg Bornkessel
GnuPG Key: 0x93EB5F4DAA5832A1
Fingerprint: 0E0A A1EE 1DF4 41D7
# Ulrich Müller (2020-01-12)
# Runtime errors. Last upstream release in 2003. No license.
# Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #703548.
games-board/cgoban2
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 12/5/2019 09:24, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 8:59 AM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>>
>> It's quite another to mask random packages that have USE flags to
>> optionally support whatever python 2.7 library. If you're going to
>> last rites these, talk with the maintainer first, and
On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 17:07 -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> On 12/5/2019 09:24, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 8:59 AM Jason A. Donenfeld > > wrote:
> > > It's quite another to mask random packages that have USE flags to
> > > optionally support whatever python 2.7 library. If you're
On 1/12/2020 17:17, David Seifert wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 17:07 -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>> On 12/5/2019 09:24, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 8:59 AM Jason A. Donenfeld >>> wrote:
It's quite another to mask random packages that have USE flags to
optionally suppo
On Sonntag, 12. Januar 2020 23:07:24 CET Joshua Kinard wrote:
> It might be worthwhile to treat the removal of Python-2.7 from the tree in
> the same manner as an EAPI deprecation and removal, given how ingrained it
> is due to its longevity. That will minimize the whiplash-effect of emerge
> comp
On 1/12/2020 17:32, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
> On Sonntag, 12. Januar 2020 23:07:24 CET Joshua Kinard wrote:
>> It might be worthwhile to treat the removal of Python-2.7 from the tree in
>> the same manner as an EAPI deprecation and removal, given how ingrained it
>> is due to its longevity. Th
On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 17:43 -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> On 1/12/2020 17:32, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
> > On Sonntag, 12. Januar 2020 23:07:24 CET Joshua Kinard wrote:
> > > It might be worthwhile to treat the removal of Python-2.7 from
> > > the tree in
> > > the same manner as an EAPI depreca
On 1/12/2020 17:46, David Seifert wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 17:43 -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>> On 1/12/2020 17:32, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
>>> On Sonntag, 12. Januar 2020 23:07:24 CET Joshua Kinard wrote:
It might be worthwhile to treat the removal of Python-2.7 from
the tree i
# Mike Gilbert (2020-01-12)
# No upstream activity since 2014, no reverse deps.
# Remove in 30 days.
dev-python/transmissionrpc
On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 17:55 -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> On 1/12/2020 17:46, David Seifert wrote:
> > On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 17:43 -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> > > On 1/12/2020 17:32, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
> > > > On Sonntag, 12. Januar 2020 23:07:24 CET Joshua Kinard wrote:
> > > > > It mig
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2020-01-12 23:59 UTC.
Removals:
app-i18n/man-pages-da 20200108-17:41 ulm d14e33ef313
app-laptop/nvidiabl 20200112-17:35 zlogene da980880462
dev-db
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 12:17:36AM +0100, David Seifert wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 17:55 -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> > On 1/12/2020 17:46, David Seifert wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 17:43 -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> > > > On 1/12/2020 17:32, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
> > > > > On So
On 1/12/2020 19:21, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 12:17:36AM +0100, David Seifert wrote:
>> On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 17:55 -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>>> On 1/12/2020 17:46, David Seifert wrote:
On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 17:43 -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> On 1/12/2020 17:32, An
On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 17:07 -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> I'm late to the party as usual. Seems upstream plans a final 2.7.18
> security update in April of 2020, then they will consider the 2.7 branch
> EOL. They say most of these updates were done in 2019, and so are still
> technically sticking
On Montag, 13. Januar 2020 01:44:55 CET Joshua Kinard wrote:
> I am working now to remove the remaining py2 packages
> from my systems and then rebuild the python packages to only handle py3.
Here's a suggestion: Skim through the packages on your system that are py27-
only and look them up upstre
24 matches
Mail list logo
