Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v4 00/14] GLEP 63 update

> On Sat, 7 Jul 2018, Michał Górny wrote: [Section "Bare minimum requirements"] > 1. SHA2-series output digest (SHA1 digests internally permitted), >256bit or more:: >personal-digest-preferences SHA256 Is the config line still needed with current GnuPG versions? > 2. Signing su

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: dev-go/godebug-pretty and many more

Dear all, The following packages are up for grabs: dev-go/godebug-pretty dev-go/fuzzy dev-go/zglob dev-go/qr dev-go/twofactor www-plugins/browserpass www-client/luakit dev-lua/mpack dev-lua/luacheck app-misc/openastro app-misc/openastro-data dev-python/pyswisseph dev-python/neovim-remote sys-apps

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v4 13/14] glep-0063: Remove whitespace from LDAP field

> On Sat, 7 Jul 2018, Michał Górny wrote: > All Gentoo developers must list the complete fingerprint for their primary > keys in the "``gpgfingerprint``" LDAP field. It must be exactly 40 hex > digits, > -uppercase, with optional spaces every 8 hex digits. Regular expression for > -validati

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v4 13/14] glep-0063: Remove whitespace from LDAP field

W dniu sob, 07.07.2018 o godzinie 14∶27 +0200, użytkownik Ulrich Mueller napisał: > > > > > > On Sat, 7 Jul 2018, Michał Górny wrote: > > All Gentoo developers must list the complete fingerprint for their primary > > keys in the "``gpgfingerprint``" LDAP field. It must be exactly 40 hex > > digi

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v4 00/14] GLEP 63 update

W dniu sob, 07.07.2018 o godzinie 14∶17 +0200, użytkownik Ulrich Mueller napisał: > > > > > > On Sat, 7 Jul 2018, Michał Górny wrote: > > [Section "Bare minimum requirements"] > > > 1. SHA2-series output digest (SHA1 digests internally permitted), > >256bit or more:: > >personal-diges

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v4 00/14] GLEP 63 update

> On Sat, 07 Jul 2018, Michał Górny wrote: >> > 1. SHA2-series output digest (SHA1 digests internally permitted), >> >256bit or more:: >> >personal-digest-preferences SHA256 >> >> Is the config line still needed with current GnuPG versions? > I'll let others answer that. In any

[gentoo-dev] News Item: Portage rsync hardlink support

Please review. Title: Portage rsync hardlink support Author: Zac Medico Posted: 2018-07-11 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 2.0 Display-If-Installed: sys-apps/portage For users of the rsync tree, beginning with sys-apps/portage-2.3.42, the default behavior for sync operations will use hardlinks in

Re: [gentoo-dev] News Item: Portage rsync hardlink support

Dnia 8 lipca 2018 08:08:31 CEST, Zac Medico napisał(a): >Please review. > >Title: Portage rsync hardlink support >Author: Zac Medico >Posted: 2018-07-11 >Revision: 1 >News-Item-Format: 2.0 >Display-If-Installed: sys-apps/portage > >For users of the rsync tree, beginning with sys-apps/portage-2.3.