Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] multiversion ebuilds

2018-05-12 14:20 GMT+02:00 Gerion Entrup : just an idea for now. But what you think about multiversion ebuilds? > Technically this could be realized with the following line in the ebuild > itself: > ``` > VERSIONS=( 3.0.11 3.0.12 3.1 ) > ``` > I like the idea of multiversion ebuilds but why would

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.5 -> 3.6 switch

On 18-05-15 07:38:36, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > In no less than 30 days, we will be switching the default Python targets > from CPython 3.5 to 3.6. The new values will be: > > PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_6" > PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python3_6" > > If you haven't ported you

Re: [gentoo-dev] Openstack Summit MeetUp: dinner planning for Wednesday?

On Mon, 14 May 2018 22:49:26 + "Robin H. Johnson" wrote: > On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 01:11:30PM -0700, Jack Morgan wrote: > > Gentoo, > > > > I will be attending the Openstack Summit in Vancouver, BC. The > > conference is May 21-24th. I would like to organize a Gentoo meetup > > for those att

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item review: Python 3.6 to become the default target

Hi Michał, El 15/05/18 a las 08:20, Michał Górny escribió: > If you are still using Python 3.4, please consider switching to a newer > version as it is reaching its end-of-life. The end-of-life dates > for the currently used versions are: > > Python 3.42019-03-16 > Python 2.72

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item review: Python 3.6 to become the default target

W dniu wto, 15.05.2018 o godzinie 22∶51 +0200, użytkownik Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) napisał: > Hi Michał, > > El 15/05/18 a las 08:20, Michał Górny escribió: > > If you are still using Python 3.4, please consider switching to a newer > > version as it is reaching its end-of-life.

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-misc/asterisk-g729, sci-libs/coinhsl, some games-*/* (BLAKE2B)

# Michał Górny (15 May 2018) # Distfile missing BLAKE2B hash. The package is fetch-restricted, # the sources can apparently by only obtained by buying it, or filing # an academic license request and having it approved. Please provide # the updated hash if you have the matching distfile. # Bug #6

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] multiversion ebuilds

Mathy Vanvoorden posted on Tue, 15 May 2018 11:32:30 +0200 as excerpted: > 2018-05-12 14:20 GMT+02:00 Gerion Entrup : > > just an idea for now. But what you think about multiversion ebuilds? >> Technically this could be realized with the following line in the ebuild >> itself: >> ``` >> VERSIONS=

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] multiversion ebuilds

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 11:15 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Mathy Vanvoorden posted on Tue, 15 May 2018 11:32:30 +0200 as excerpted: > >> 2018-05-12 14:20 GMT+02:00 Gerion Entrup : >> >> just an idea for now. But what you think about multiversion ebuilds? >>> Technically this could be

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] multiversion ebuilds

R0b0t1 wrote: > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 11:15 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: >> >> AFAIK symlinks aren't allowed in the gentoo tree [...] >> >> Tho perhaps that can be reevaluated. [...] > > Cygwin and MSYS(2) are currently mostly supported by Prefix [...] For rsync users, the non-symli

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] multiversion ebuilds

On 12/05/2018 14:20, Gerion Entrup wrote: > just an idea for now. But what you think about multiversion ebuilds? > Technically this could be realized with the following line in the ebuild > itself: > ``` > VERSIONS=( 3.0.11 3.0.12 3.1 ) > ``` > > and the filename without version: > //.ebuild I'm

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] multiversion ebuilds

> On Wed, 16 May 2018, Paweł Hajdan, wrote: > I'm wondering: if the main goal would be more code sharing between > ebuilds, would something like > > (essentially per-package eclasses) be an option? eblits! /me hides pgpSQ9fZWt