W dniu śro, 09.05.2018 o godzinie 08∶51 +0200, użytkownik Dennis
Schridde napisał:
> Hello!
>
> I see sandbox violations similar to "ACCESS DENIED: open_wr: /dev/dri/
> renderD128" pop up for more and more packages, probably since OpenCL becomes
> used more widely. Hence I would like to ask: Cou
On Wednesday, 9 May 2018 09:34:43 CEST Michał Górny wrote:
> W dniu śro, 09.05.2018 o godzinie 08∶51 +0200, użytkownik Dennis
>
> Schridde napisał:
> > I see sandbox violations similar to "ACCESS DENIED: open_wr: /dev/dri/
> > renderD128" pop up for more and more packages, probably since OpenCL
>
W dniu śro, 09.05.2018 o godzinie 09∶56 +0200, użytkownik Dennis
Schridde napisał:
> On Wednesday, 9 May 2018 09:34:43 CEST Michał Górny wrote:
> > W dniu śro, 09.05.2018 o godzinie 08∶51 +0200, użytkownik Dennis
> >
> > Schridde napisał:
> > > I see sandbox violations similar to "ACCESS DENIED: o
---
v3, including suggestions from Duncan and Hello71.
eclass/eapi7-ver.eclass | 16 +++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/eapi7-ver.eclass b/eclass/eapi7-ver.eclass
index 6117124a90a5..e34025e201c7 100644
--- a/eclass/eapi7-ver.eclass
+++ b/eclass/
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:51 PM, Dennis Schridde wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I see sandbox violations similar to "ACCESS DENIED: open_wr: /dev/dri/
> renderD128" pop up for more and more packages, probably since OpenCL becomes
> used more widely. Hence I would like to ask: Could we in Gentoo treat GPUs
>
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:51 PM, Dennis Schridde wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> I see sandbox violations similar to "ACCESS DENIED: open_wr: /dev/dri/
>> renderD128" pop up for more and more packages, probably since OpenCL becomes
>> used more widely.
On 09/05/18 18:10, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:51 PM, Dennis Schridde wrote:
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> I see sandbox violations similar to "ACCESS DENIED: open_wr: /dev/dri/
>>> renderD128" pop up for more and more packages, prob
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:51 PM, Dennis Schridde
> wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I see sandbox violations similar to "ACCESS DENIED: open_wr: /dev/dri/
> > renderD128" pop up for more and more packages, probably since OpenCL
> becomes
> > used mo
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:51 PM, Dennis Schridde wrote:
> I see sandbox violations similar to "ACCESS DENIED: open_wr: /dev/dri/
> renderD128" pop up for more and more packages, probably since OpenCL becomes
> used more widely.
I want to respond to the mention of OpenCL being more widely used...
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:19 AM, Alec Warner wrote:
> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:51 PM, Dennis Schridde
>> wrote:
>> > Hello!
>> >
>> > I see sandbox violations similar to "ACCESS DENIED: open_wr: /dev/dri/
>> > renderD128" pop up for more
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
> Irrespective to the answer to that question, it's my opinion that we
> should not execute code via the package manager that has the potential
> to bring down the whole system.
... and if anyone doubts that possibility, please do a full piglit
On Wed, 9 May 2018 18:12:32 +0100
"M. J. Everitt" wrote:
> > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> > It's worth noting that the default rules shipped with udev assign mode
> > 0666 to the /dev/dri/renderD* device nodes. So, outside of a sanbox
> > environment, any user may acce
On 09/05/18 19:50, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Wed, 9 May 2018 18:12:32 +0100
> "M. J. Everitt" wrote:
>
>>> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>>> It's worth noting that the default rules shipped with udev assign mode
>>> 0666 to the /dev/dri/renderD* device nodes. So, outside of
On Wed, 9 May 2018 19:54:16 +0100
"M. J. Everitt" wrote:
> Do correct me if I'm mistaken ...
Right, just the statement of:
"I wonder how that pans out for other init systems"
Understandably introduces some confusion, when udev is not an init
system, and is frequently used in conjunction with
On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 07:54:16PM +0100, M. J. Everitt wrote:
> On 09/05/18 19:50, Kent Fredric wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 May 2018 18:12:32 +0100
> > "M. J. Everitt" wrote:
> >
> >>> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> >>>
> >>> It's worth noting that the default rules shipped wi
On 09/05/18 20:31, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 07:54:16PM +0100, M. J. Everitt wrote:
>> ^ That is relatively common knowledge .. my question was more steered
>> towards whether Eudev is carrying this feature through as well (which
>> likely as they might ... ) I believe eudev wa
16 matches
Mail list logo
