Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> If I'm recalling correctly a warning posted on this list, repeated calls
> to the github tarballing API for the same commit will result in delivery
> of tarballs with differing checksums.
This was so many many years ago in the beginning of github.
This has
On 03/12/2018 04:29 AM, Martin Vaeth wrote:
> Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>> If I'm recalling correctly a warning posted on this list, repeated calls
>> to the github tarballing API for the same commit will result in delivery
>> of tarballs with differing checksums.
>
> This was so man
> sys-power/acpid
Taking this one.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 05:57:35PM +0100, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Mar 2018 16:40:44 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > As part of that we also shouldn't deliver static libraries
>
> OK, so you want to absolutely kill dead the only current sane way for
> developers who use Gentoo to shi
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 13:53:34 +
Andrey Utkin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 05:57:35PM +0100, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> > On Thu, 08 Mar 2018 16:40:44 +0100
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > > As part of that we also shouldn't deliver static libraries
> >
> > OK, so you want to absolutely
On 03/11/2018 09:58 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote:
> On 12/03/18 04:53, Duncan wrote:
>> Zac Medico posted on Sun, 11 Mar 2018 19:57:31 -0700 as excerpted:
>>
>>> I really don't want to spend a lot of time making revisions, and I think
>>> "unstable" communicates well enough in this case.
>> Very well th
Bug 650324 noticed some inconsistencies with how user patches are applied.
Previously, it attempted to call default_src_prepare per target.
This, of course, would not reapply user patches for each target.
These patches bring this back into alignment and adjust packages which
would be negatively a
