On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Hanno Böck posted on Sat, 21 Oct 2017 19:50:11 +0200 as excerpted:
>
>> On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 12:12:44 -0500 R0b0t1 wrote:
>>
>>> People are discussing collision resistance, but no one here appears to
>>> be trained in cryptogra
My apologies, I forgot to address something:
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Hanno Böck wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 12:12:44 -0500
> R0b0t1 wrote:
>
>> That is precisely why I didn't suggest it be used on its own (see note
>> about extant use of MD5), and why I gave alternatives. If it is
>>
Hi "R0b0t1",
>>> For the record, I'd claim I am.
The question
> On what basis?
is ok, but
> I performed a search on your name, and found at least
> one person who was belligerently calling you a liar [..]
does not fit here. Please keep this dirt away from our mailinglist and
stay professional.
Hello,
On Wednesday, November 8, 2017, Jonas Stein wrote:
> Hi "R0b0t1",
>
For the record, I'd claim I am.
>
> The question
>> On what basis?
> is ok, but
>
>> I performed a search on your name, and found at least
>> one person who was belligerently calling you a liar [..]
>
> does not fit h
