Hi!
I haven't used atftp in a *long* time and upstream is either dead
or has entered a time capsule on SF.net.
Open bugs:
513486 net-ftp/atftp - increase BKLSIZE
635786 net-ftp/atftp-0.7-r5 : neither HOMEPAGE nor originalSRC_URI available
any more
The former is ancient (and I only now realize
Tobias Klausmann wrote:
>
> I haven't used atftp in a *long* time and upstream is either dead
> or has entered a time capsule on SF.net.
> I am considering last-riting it right away
I'm still using it every day (our PBX uploads its accounting tickets
to our Gentoo server using TFTP). If it's gon
On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 09:32:17 +0100
Matthias Hanft wrote:
> Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> >
> > I haven't used atftp in a *long* time and upstream is either dead
> > or has entered a time capsule on SF.net.
> > I am considering last-riting it right away
>
> I'm still using it every day (our PBX up
> I haven't used atftp in a *long* time and upstream is either dead
> or has entered a time capsule on SF.net.
>
> Open bugs:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/513486 net-ftp/atftp - increase BKLSIZE
https://bugs.gentoo.org/635786 net-ftp/atftp-0.7-r5 : neither HOMEPAGE
nor originalSRC_URI available any mo
W dniu nie, 29.10.2017 o godzinie 20∶54 +, użytkownik Robin H.
Johnson napisał:
> On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 07:47:41PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> ...
> > > If users need other values, it's a package-manager config knob.
> >
> > We don't want pre-EAPI times where things will fail out of the box
W dniu nie, 29.10.2017 o godzinie 20∶39 +, użytkownik Robin H.
Johnson napisał:
> On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 08:07:56PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> > File verification model
> > ---
> > The verification model aims to provide full coverage against different
> > forms of attack.
Here's another version with a few clarification-class changes:
62819e2 glep-0074: Clarify OPTIONAL desc
e953eaf glep-0074: Add two example files for reference
f98cabc glep-0074: Reorganize to have tag references after basic algos
56b06b0 glep-0074: Rewrite the file verificaton to cover OPTIONAL
bb
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 05:51:36PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
...
> Directory tree coverage
> ---
This section should maybe cover OPTIONAL in more detail (see more
below).
> The Manifest files can also specify ``IGNORE`` entries to skip Manifest
> verification of subdirectories