W dniu sob, 21.10.2017 o godzinie 04∶01 +0200, użytkownik Jason A.
Donenfeld napisał:
> Blake2 is in coreutils already, provides an excellent security margin, and
> is considerably faster than both sha2 and sha3.
>
Yes, we've already switched the proposal to BLAKE2B. Although it is only
faster if
W dniu sob, 21.10.2017 o godzinie 04∶08 +0200, użytkownik Chí-Thanh
Christopher Nguyễn napisał:
> Michał Górny schrieb:
> > to:
> >
> > manifest-hashes = SHA512 SHA3_512
>
> +1
>
> Just wondering about the performance argument on weak systems:
> Does Portage absolutely have to check all of the
On 20/10/2017 18:15, Michał Górny wrote:
> W dniu pią, 20.10.2017 o godzinie 17∶42 +0200, użytkownik Paweł Hajdan,
> Jr. napisał:
>> Curious, do we have any measurements/estimates of the performance cost?
>
> With a single thread serial processing of all hashes, it's just sum of
> times involved i
W dniu sob, 21.10.2017 o godzinie 10∶01 +0200, użytkownik Paweł Hajdan,
Jr. napisał:
> On 20/10/2017 18:15, Michał Górny wrote:
> > W dniu pią, 20.10.2017 o godzinie 17∶42 +0200, użytkownik Paweł Hajdan,
> > Jr. napisał:
> > > Curious, do we have any measurements/estimates of the performance cost?
# Kent Fredric (21 Oct 2017)
# Has not been usable since we cleaned the last Moose it worked on back
# in 2012. Removal in 30 days. Bug #634938
dev-perl/File-Stat-Moose
pgpLCMq5sFeDL.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 05:21:47PM -0500, R0b0t1 wrote:
> I would like to present my suggestions:
>
> SHA512, (RIPEMD160 | WHIRLPOOL | BLAKE2B), (SHA3_512 | BLAKE2B);
>
> or more definitively:
>
> SHA512, RIPEMD160, BLAKE2B.
Please do NOT reintroduce RIPEMD160. It was one of the older Portage
ha
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 05:21:47PM -0500, R0b0t1 wrote:
>> I would like to present my suggestions:
>>
>> SHA512, (RIPEMD160 | WHIRLPOOL | BLAKE2B), (SHA3_512 | BLAKE2B);
>>
>> or more definitively:
>>
>> SHA512, RIPEMD160, BLAKE2B.
> Plea
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 12:12 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 05:21:47PM -0500, R0b0t1 wrote:
>>> I would like to present my suggestions:
>>>
>>> SHA512, (RIPEMD160 | WHIRLPOOL | BLAKE2B), (SHA3_512 | BLAKE2B);
>>>
>>> or mo
On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 12:12:44 -0500
R0b0t1 wrote:
> That is precisely why I didn't suggest it be used on its own (see note
> about extant use of MD5), and why I gave alternatives. If it is
> desired that the hashes be computed quickly then weaker hashes will
> need to be used. One usually can't ha
Hanno Böck posted on Sat, 21 Oct 2017 19:50:11 +0200 as excerpted:
> On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 12:12:44 -0500 R0b0t1 wrote:
>
>> People are discussing collision resistance, but no one here appears to
>> be trained in cryptography.
>
> For the record, I'd claim I am.
... And with a number of vuln dis
Hi Michael,
> As some of you may noticed i started to clean up some old patches in the
> gentoo portage tree. I did so already a while ago, and like before I'm
> using a small script in order to identify unused patches.
>
> I few days ago i started to hack again on that script and thought about
>
# Andreas Sturmlechner (21 Oct 2017)
# Dead upstream, depends on dead kdelibs4/Qt4.
# Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #629018
sci-calculators/keurocalc
# Andreas Sturmlechner (21 Oct 2017)
# Dead upstream, depends on dead kdelibs4/Qt4.
# Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #629018
net-misc/knu
$subject or a new maintainer comes up with a port to Qt5.
# Andreas Sturmlechner (22 Oct 2017)
# Reverse-deps on dead, masked Qt4WebKit. Bug #623928
net-im/qutim
13 matches
Mail list logo
