Re: [gentoo-dev] New item for sys-kernel/hardened-sources removal

2017-08-16 Thread Marek Szuba
On 2017-08-15 17:01, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) wrote: > I'd like to get this one up by Saturday so that we can proceed with > masking and removing of the hardened-sources after upstream stopped > releasing new patches. > > This is my first time writting a news item so all input wi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing PMS to Portage Manager Specification

2017-08-16 Thread Marek Szuba
On 2017-08-14 23:46, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > pkgcore - does not support EAPI 6, only experimental EAPI 5 Side note - according to https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Package_Manager_Specification pkgcore has supported EAPI 6 since version 0.9.3. Considering it says exactly the same for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing PMS to Portage Manager Specification

2017-08-16 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Wed, 16 Aug 2017, Marek Szuba wrote: > On 2017-08-14 23:46, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: >> pkgcore - does not support EAPI 6, only experimental EAPI 5 > Side note - according to > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Package_Manager_Specification > pkgcore has supported EAPI 6 since

Re: [gentoo-dev] New item for sys-kernel/hardened-sources removal

2017-08-16 Thread Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)
El 16/08/17 a las 09:40, Marek Szuba escribió: > Two tiny bits of formal nitpicking from my side: > - it's "grsecurity" (not a typo, they do use a lowercase g except when > the name appears at the beginning of a sentence), not "grsec"; > - the patches were not *distributed by* grsecurity, they *a

Re: [gentoo-dev] [FRC] News item: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula

2017-08-16 Thread tomjbe
Quoting Thomas Beierlein (2017-08-14 21:58:42) > Bacula ebuilds uses some weird USE flags with mostly negative > logic ('do not build ..') coming from their build system. > > With the actual major release (bacula-9.0.3) we should try to switch to > something more sane. I picked up the new flags fr

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing PMS to Portage Manager Specification

2017-08-16 Thread Tim Harder
On 2017-08-16 05:56, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > Considering it says exactly the same for EAPI 5, this is almost > > certainly a mistake - but I'd rather confirm this here before > > changing the page. > Unfortunately, information about EAPI 4 and 5 support is not entirely > clear from the NEWS file

[gentoo-dev] Re: Revisions for USE flag changes

2017-08-16 Thread Duncan
Michael Orlitzky posted on Tue, 15 Aug 2017 23:22:54 -0400 as excerpted: > On 08/14/2017 08:01 AM, Jason Zaman wrote: >> >> I'll give an example where revbumps are significantly inferior to >> --changed-use. >> >> ... With --changed-use, only the people who need it (ie selinux users) >> will re

Re: [gentoo-dev] New item for sys-kernel/hardened-sources removal

2017-08-16 Thread Duncan
Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) posted on Wed, 16 Aug 2017 12:09:57 +0200 as excerpted: > s you may know the core of sys-kernel/hardened-sources have been the > grsecuirty patches. New typo: s/grsecuirty/grsecurity/ -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree pr

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Revisions for USE flag changes

2017-08-16 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > > But even if that's the case (I wouldn't know), it's the case due to a > deliberate decision of those going "under the bus", because portage is > the default, and by choosing to use some other PM, they've deliberately > chose

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Revisions for USE flag changes

2017-08-16 Thread Daniel Campbell
On 08/13/2017 03:11 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 08/12/2017 10:52 PM, Duncan wrote: >> >> How so? Are you arguing that deciding to system-wide switch to/from >> pulseaudio, systemd, or gstreamer is nonsense? >> > > The meaning of any one USE flag varies widely across packages. I could > neve

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing PMS to Portage Manager Specification

2017-08-16 Thread Daniel Campbell
On 08/14/2017 03:39 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 15:20:26 -0700 > Rich Freeman wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:26 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. >> wrote: >>> >>> Portage supports sets, but the PMS has no mention. Then there is >>> debate on what they are. Creating s

[gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: net-dns/dnscrypt-proxy

2017-08-16 Thread Gokturk Yuksek
Hi, The following package is up for grabs: net-dns/dnscrypt-proxy signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Revisions for USE flag changes

2017-08-16 Thread Jason Zaman
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:22:54PM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 08/14/2017 08:01 AM, Jason Zaman wrote: > > > > I'll give an example where revbumps are significantly inferior to > > --changed-use. > > > > ... With --changed-use, only the people who need it (ie selinux > > users) will reb

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: net-dns/dnscrypt-proxy

2017-08-16 Thread Georgy Yakovlev
Hi, I'd like to take this one. Currently working on the new version and submitted a pull request. https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/5346 My proxy is Polynomial-C@ Regards, Georgy Yakovlev On 08/16/2017 08:47 PM, Gokturk Yuksek wrote: > Hi, > > The following package is up for grabs: > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] New package neomutt

2017-08-16 Thread Daniel Campbell
On 08/10/2017 01:10 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > On czw, 2017-08-10 at 09:54 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: >> On 10-08-2017 09:40:30 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: >>> On czw, 2017-08-10 at 06:58 +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote: On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 09:11:19AM +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote: > Hi, > >