On czw, 2017-08-10 at 06:58 +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 09:11:19AM +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to add neomutt to the tree. This new package is meant as
> > an alternative and not a replacement of the existing mutt package.
>
> Thanks for all o
On 10-08-2017 09:40:30 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> On czw, 2017-08-10 at 06:58 +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 09:11:19AM +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I would like to add neomutt to the tree. This new package is meant as
> > > an alternative and not a r
On czw, 2017-08-10 at 09:54 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 10-08-2017 09:40:30 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On czw, 2017-08-10 at 06:58 +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 09:11:19AM +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I would like to add neomutt to the
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 10:10:04AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
On czw, 2017-08-10 at 09:54 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 10-08-2017 09:40:30 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> On czw, 2017-08-10 at 06:58 +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 09:11:19AM +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote:
> >
* Nicolas Bock schrieb am 10.08.17 um 11:35 Uhr:
> It does of course. What's appropriate here depends on whether we
> think somebody might want to have both mutt and neomutt installed
> at the same time. If we don't allow this use case, we don't have
> to worry about eselect and the neomutt bina
On 10-08-2017 14:13:29 +0200, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> * Nicolas Bock schrieb am 10.08.17 um 11:35 Uhr:
> > It does of course. What's appropriate here depends on whether we
> > think somebody might want to have both mutt and neomutt installed
> > at the same time. If we don't allow this use case
This may take me some time. The live cd doesn't even seem to use this. And
that plugin is unmaintained so I forked it.
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 11:08 PM, Matthew Thode
wrote:
> On 17-08-04 17:17:05, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> > On K, 2017-07-26 at 11:56 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > > sys-boot/plymout
On czw, 2017-08-10 at 11:35 +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 10:10:04AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On czw, 2017-08-10 at 09:54 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > > On 10-08-2017 09:40:30 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > > On czw, 2017-08-10 at 06:58 +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote:
On czw, 2017-08-10 at 14:16 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 10-08-2017 14:13:29 +0200, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> > * Nicolas Bock schrieb am 10.08.17 um 11:35 Uhr:
> > > It does of course. What's appropriate here depends on whether we
> > > think somebody might want to have both mutt and neomutt
Hi Gentoo Team,
As some of you may noticed i started to clean up some old patches in the
gentoo portage tree. I did so already a while ago, and like before I'm
using a small script in order to identify unused patches.
I few days ago i started to hack again on that script and thought about
to make
On 10-08-2017 16:09:53 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> ...which probably makes sense if you treat is as a continuation of mail-
> client/mutt package. However, since we package it separately, using
> the same name is going to create more confusion than renaming it to
> match the package name.
>
> If
On 17-07-26 11:56:39, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> sys-boot/plymouth is orphan for a long time. Its old 0.8.x versions where
> having
> important bugs that were fixed in 0.9.x, but 0.9 is also plenty of issues.
> Then,
> either this is adopted by someone able to handle all that issues or we will
> need
On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 13:33:54 +1000
"Sam Jorna (wraeth)" wrote:
>
> This is no greater risk than syncing from a potentially compromised
> mirror. You would use a mirror you trust and, similarly (perhaps even
> more so) you would use a binhost you trust.
Getting a bit ridiculous now. Let me get my
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 06:58:57AM +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 09:11:19AM +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I would like to add neomutt to the tree. This new package is meant as
> >an alternative and not a replacement of the existing mutt package.
>
> Thanks for al
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017, at 15:43 CDT, "Andreas K. Huettel"
wrote:
> Hey there,
>
> it's time we do a proper lead election and have a toolchain meeting again.
>
> So, here's the plan:
>
> 1) team lead election:
> * Nominations from now until August 18, by e-mailing to the toolchain alias
> * Vot
Sergei Trofimovich posted on Tue, 08 Aug 2017 16:53:22 +0100 as excerpted:
> The failure happens when live glibc- ebuild is installed:
> * QA Notice: Missing gen_usr_ldscript for libm-2.26.90.so * ERROR:
> sys-libs/glibc-::gentoo failed:
> * add those ldscripts
>
> The problem here i
William L. Thomson Jr. posted on Tue, 08 Aug 2017 12:37:42 -0400 as
excerpted:
> I make a lot of binaries for use on other systems, to expedite updates.
> It does not make sense for some packages to ever be a binary package.
>
> Packages like -bin packages or gentoo-sources, which are just source
On 11/08/17 03:08, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> Lets go down this rabbit hole.
Let's not.
--
Sam Jorna (wraeth)
GnuPG ID: D6180C26
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 23:30:37 + (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Meanwhile, having buildpkg on virtual packages[1] is what amuses me.
> There, most of the benefits of binpkgs that arguably apply even to
> prebuilt binary and no-bin packages as long as they package and
> install /
19 matches
Mail list logo
