On 2017-05-29, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
> from the tree, for the week ending 2017-05-28 23:59 UTC.
>
> Removals:
> app-editors/vim-qt 20170525-10:36 mgorny 1aff8d7da4e
This was announced here in April[1
On 27/05/17 18:17, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> But you do gentoo wrong, so as a user I'd like you to reconsider what
> you wrote there and maybe take a long vacation.
I too do not hate our users (in which I include myself).
Treating users as a worthless nuisance, unless they're writing ebuilds
or mana
On 2017.05.29 11:59, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
> On 27/05/17 18:17, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> > But you do gentoo wrong, so as a user I'd like you to reconsider
> what
> > you wrote there and maybe take a long vacation.
> I too do not hate our users (in which I include myself).
>
> Treating users as
On pon, 2017-05-29 at 12:10 +0300, nunojsi...@ist.utl.pt wrote:
> On 2017-05-29, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>
> > The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
> > from the tree, for the week ending 2017-05-28 23:59 UTC.
> >
> > Removals:
> > app-editors/vim-qt
Hello,
For a long time we seem to be missing appropriate tools to handle USE
flag constraints efficiently. EAPI 4 brought REQUIRED_USE but all things
considered, it has proven to be far from an optimal solution. I would
therefore like to discuss adding a better tool to amend or replace it,
to allo
On Mon, 29 May 2017 17:33:13 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> Automatically solving USE constraints solve all three fore-mentioned
> issues with REQUIRED_USE. By default, no user intervention is required
> to solve USE constraints and package.use needs to be modified only to
> enforce a non-standard s
On wto, 2017-05-30 at 04:30 +1200, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Mon, 29 May 2017 17:33:13 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > Automatically solving USE constraints solve all three fore-mentioned
> > issues with REQUIRED_USE. By default, no user intervention is required
> > to solve USE constraints and
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 08:29:59PM +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote
> On 05/26/2017 08:07 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > A bit late to the party, but what was the outcome of the meeting, esp.
> > this part ?
>
> Unofficial log from meeting:
> https://download.sumptuouscapital.com/gentoo/tmp/gento
On Mon, 29 May 2017 17:33:13 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For a long time we seem to be missing appropriate tools to handle USE
> flag constraints efficiently. EAPI 4 brought REQUIRED_USE but all
> things considered, it has proven to be far from an optimal solution.
> I would therefore
On Mon, 29 May 2017 17:33:13 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> For a long time we seem to be missing appropriate tools to handle USE
> flag constraints efficiently. EAPI 4 brought REQUIRED_USE but all
> things considered, it has proven to be far from an optimal solution.
> I would therefore like to disc
On pon, 2017-05-29 at 20:24 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 29 May 2017 17:33:13 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
> > For a long time we seem to be missing appropriate tools to handle USE
> > flag constraints efficiently. EAPI 4 brought REQUIRED_USE but all
> > things considered, it has proven
On Mon, 29 May 2017 21:42:33 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> On pon, 2017-05-29 at 20:24 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 May 2017 17:33:13 +0200
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> > > For a long time we seem to be missing appropriate tools to handle
> > > USE flag constraints efficiently. EAPI
---
eclass/meson.eclass | 74 +
1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/meson.eclass b/eclass/meson.eclass
index 758e4180ba7a..0fdb1d848973 100644
--- a/eclass/meson.eclass
+++ b/eclass/meson.eclass
@@ -39,8 +39,7 @
On pon, 2017-05-29 at 16:58 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> ---
> eclass/meson.eclass | 74
> +
> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/eclass/meson.eclass b/eclass/meson.eclass
> index 758e4180ba7a..0fdb1d848973 10064
On pon, 2017-05-29 at 20:00 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Mon, 29 May 2017 17:33:13 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > In the basic form, it can be used to conditionally force a specific
> > flag to be enabled or disabled. For example:
> >
> > foo? ( bar )
> >
> > would mean that the bar f
On Mon, 29 May 2017 23:23:55 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> > Can you provide an efficient algorithm for the above syntax?
> > That is, given a set of +/- useflags forced by user, output the set
> > of effective useflags (or a rant if it is inconsistent).
>
> I'd rather leave that to people who ar
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On pon, 2017-05-29 at 16:58 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> + # system roughly corresponds to uname -s (lowercase)
>> + local system=unknown
>> + case ${CHOST} in
>> + *-aix*) system=aix ;;
>> + *-cygwin*)
> On Mon, 29 May 2017, Michał Górny wrote:
> On pon, 2017-05-29 at 20:00 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
>> Can you provide an efficient algorithm for the above syntax? That
>> is, given a set of +/- useflags forced by user, output the set of
>> effective useflags (or a rant if it is inconsistent
Am Montag, 29. Mai 2017, 19:32:48 CEST schrieb Walter Dnes:
>
> The irc log mentions problems with some ebuilds under some versions of
> GCC. In a similar vein, are there any anticipated issues with binaries
> built under older GCC versions running on a system that is otherwise
> all-GCC-6.3.0
On Tue, 30 May 2017 00:01:16 +0200
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 May 2017, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On pon, 2017-05-29 at 20:00 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> >> Can you provide an efficient algorithm for the above syntax? That
> >> is, given a set of +/- useflags forced by user, out
20 matches
Mail list logo
