Hi all,
I will post an RFC for a profile update (and a news item) for 17.0
shortly with the following change:
- unmask pie use flag for sys-devel/gcc
- unconditionally force pie and ssp use flag for sys-devel/gcc
Any additional profile changes for our
default/linux/*/13.0
that shall be
> On Fri, 12 May 2017, Matthias Maier wrote:
> I will post an RFC for a profile update (and a news item) for 17.0
We used to count from 1999 (namely, 10.0 introducing the counting
appeared on our 10th anniversary).
So shouldn't the above be 18.0?
Ulrich
pgpaE0ZYH2Lu2.pgp
Description: PGP
On 05/12/2017 05:50 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Fri, 12 May 2017, Matthias Maier wrote:
>
>> I will post an RFC for a profile update (and a news item) for 17.0
>
> We used to count from 1999 (namely, 10.0 introducing the counting
> appeared on our 10th anniversary).
>
> So shouldn't the
On 12/05/17 16:54, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 05/12/2017 05:50 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>> On Fri, 12 May 2017, Matthias Maier wrote:
>>> I will post an RFC for a profile update (and a news item) for 17.0
>> We used to count from 1999 (namely, 10.0 introducing the counting
>> appeared
On pią, 2017-05-12 at 13:20 +0700, Alex Turbov wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Few janitorial notes for a start:
> >
> > 1. please fix your line wrapping since your messages are wrapped twice
> > now, and it's really hard to read with single words
On czw, 2017-05-11 at 11:47 +0700, Alex Turbov wrote:
> DEPEND=( doc?
> || (
> (
> dev-python/sphinx[python_targets_python2_7]
> # NOTE This packages provide extensions for Sphinx
> dev-python/rst-linker[python_
On 05/11/2017 12:51 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> In fact, I'm personally leaning towards not building docs at all
> in ebuilds. It's practically a wasted effort since most of the time
> users read docs online anyway.
I believe that's a little myopic; a user (or even developer) may not
have Internet a
Daniel Campbell wrote:
> On 05/11/2017 12:51 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> In fact, I'm personally leaning towards not building docs at all
>> in ebuilds. It's practically a wasted effort since most of the time
>> users read docs online anyway.
> I believe that's a little myopic; a user (or even devel
