> On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> [...]
> This commit adds a new global variable "EPATCH_N_APPLIED_PATCHES"
> which tracks the number of applied user patches. This allows us to
> only show the notice when user patches were really applied.
I wonder if extending an obsolete fe
On 2016-08-22 09:30, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> I wonder if extending an obsolete feature is worth the effort.
> In EAPI 6, epatch_user has been replaced by eapply_user.
Well, I created the patch in November 2015 but never submitted it.
Yesterday someone in #gentoo-dev also asked about that false-pos
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> On 2016-08-22 09:30, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> I wonder if extending an obsolete feature is worth the effort.
>> In EAPI 6, epatch_user has been replaced by eapply_user.
> Well, I created the patch in November 2015 but never submitted it.
> Ye
Dnia 22 sierpnia 2016 13:16:28 CEST, Ulrich Mueller
napisał(a):
>> On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
>
>> On 2016-08-22 09:30, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>> I wonder if extending an obsolete feature is worth the effort.
>>> In EAPI 6, epatch_user has been replaced by eapply_user.
>
>
On Sat, 20 Aug 2016 09:42:51 -0700 Raymond Jennings wrote:
> Just an FYI, games-emulation/dosbox tripped over this recently.
It should not call subversion_src_prepare() in EAPI 6 ebuild.
Please file a bug for this issue for dosbox maintainers. I can't
help you here.
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 7:05
All,
it looks like app-emulation/docker expects /etc/hostname to exist.
On Gentoo, this file does not exist, so I'm wondering how we can make it
exist?
I know in OpenRC I can read it and use the value there as the hostname
instead of /etc/conf.d/hostname if it exists,but I'm not sure whether
Ope
Now https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Ada is empty
In this concrete case, joining to this project will require a lot of
work as most of the packages under this project are facing many
important bugs for a long time and maybe they will be hard to fix :/
If nobody joins, probably we will try to
I am not sure when https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Arch_Testers wa
s created, but it's empty and unused for a long time, hence, I don't
know if anyone would be willing to join to it (I am unsure about what
will it cover over the "dedicated" arch tester teams) or it should be
removed simply :/
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Events lists no members at all,
but looking to the table below, it seems to be still active (or is PR
team the one that is taking care of that), in that case, could the
members join officially to that project then?
Thanks a lot :)
On 22/08/16 16:58, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> it looks like app-emulation/docker expects /etc/hostname to exist.
>
> On Gentoo, this file does not exist, so I'm wondering how we can make it
> exist?
>
> I know in OpenRC I can read it and use the value there as the hostname
> instead of /etc/co
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:11 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote:
> On 22/08/16 16:58, William Hubbs wrote:
>>
>> it looks like app-emulation/docker expects /etc/hostname to exist.
>>
>> On Gentoo, this file does not exist, so I'm wondering how we can make it
>> exist?
>>
>> I know in OpenRC I can read it an
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:39:03PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:11 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote:
> > On 22/08/16 16:58, William Hubbs wrote:
> >>
> >> it looks like app-emulation/docker expects /etc/hostname to exist.
> >>
> >> On Gentoo, this file does not exist, so I'm wond
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 11:36:07PM -0400, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> On 08/21/2016 15:31, William Hubbs wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > take a look at the discussion on
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=591414, in particular the last
> > few comments.
> >
> > My question is, is the emerge action ne
All,
here is a newsitem about the OpenRC runscript transition.
The glep says this should wait 72 hours before being pushed, but since
it is already in stable, if no one objects, I would like to push it
sooner, and if I do, I'll update the posted date to reflect this.
William
Title: OpenRC runsc
On 08/22/2016 11:58 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> it looks like app-emulation/docker expects /etc/hostname to exist.
>
Isn't there some kind of portable operating system standard that says
how to do these things?
As part of the user requested feature from [Gentoo-Bug #543878]
eutils.eclass shows a warning regarding user applied patches in case of an
error [Link 1].
However this warning will always be shown even if no user patch were
applied at all (example: empty /etc/portage// directory).
This commit add
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 1:03 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>
> I'm not sure about putting this in /run for a couple of reasons:
>
> The contents of this file is a setting, like /etc/conf.d/hostname, which
> will be set by the user.
There is no reason a script can't populate /run with the right thing.
On 08/22/2016 10:58 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> it looks like app-emulation/docker expects /etc/hostname to exist.
>
> On Gentoo, this file does not exist, so I'm wondering how we can make it
> exist?
>
> I know in OpenRC I can read it and use the value there as the hostname
> instead of
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 01:28:50PM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 08/22/2016 11:58 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > it looks like app-emulation/docker expects /etc/hostname to exist.
> >
>
> Isn't there some kind of portable operating system standard that says
> how to do these thi
On 08/22/2016 10:58 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> it looks like app-emulation/docker expects /etc/hostname to exist.
>
> On Gentoo, this file does not exist, so I'm wondering how we can make it
> exist?
>
> I know in OpenRC I can read it and use the value there as the hostname
> instead of
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
>
> Yes, wouldn't the Docker project be happy to take on a patch that uses
> gethostname() or so?
>
This might be another option: symlink to /proc/sys/kernel/hostname
I'm not sure if somebody can find a flaw in this. It appears to use
the U
Title: OpenRC runscript transition
Author: William Hubbs
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2016-08-25
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 1.0
Display-If-Installed: uses runscript, please convert to openrc-run.
This warning is not fatal; your system will boot normally.
To silence most of the warnings,
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 5:58 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Gentoo, this file does not exist, so I'm wondering how we can make it
> exist?
Not sure if/how related, but when I have:
djc@enrai ~ $ cat /etc/conf.d/hostname
# Set to the hostname of this machine
hostname="enrai"
Apache 2 tells me:
A
On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 10:58 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> it looks like app-emulation/docker expects /etc/hostname to exist.
Is there a bug for this? docker seems to work fine for me on a system
without this file present.
Hans
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed messa
On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 15:20 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> This packages are now up for grabs:
>
> x11-misc/revelation
I'm still using this at the moment so I'll take this.
Hans
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
El lun, 22-08-2016 a las 12:20 -0500, William Hubbs escribió:
> Title: OpenRC runscript transition
> Author: William Hubbs
> Content-Type: text/plain
> Posted: 2016-08-25
> Revision: 1
> News-Item-Format: 1.0
> Display-If-Installed:
> Starting with OpenRC 0.21.3, service script authors should us
Oops, I saw your second draft later :S
El lun, 22-08-2016 a las 14:03 -0500, William Hubbs escribió:
>
> [...]
> If you have any service scripts after running this command that
> generate
> this warning, please file bugs against the packages that own these
> scripts, not against OpenRC.
How risk
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, William Hubbs wrote:
> Display-If-Installed: # emerge --oneshot -av $(grep -l "#!/sbin/runscript" /etc/init.d/*)
Hm, I think you'll want single quotes there, otherwise the exclamation
mark could trigger bash history expansion. Alternatively, grep for
/sbin/runscript wi
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 09:28:44PM +0200, Hans de Graaff wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 10:58 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > it looks like app-emulation/docker expects /etc/hostname to exist.
>
> Is there a bug for this? docker seems to work fine for me on a system
> without this fi
Dear developers
I would like to propose the following patch to
eclass/ELT-patches/cross/2.4.3
Cross linking in dev-scheme/guile-1.8.8-r2 and net-libs/gnutls-3.4.14
fails (see https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=590404).
Best regards
Gerhard Bräunlich
--- ltmain.sh
+++ ltmain.sh
-@@
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 09:53:48PM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, William Hubbs wrote:
>
> > Display-If-Installed:
> Why the condition on the version number?
I suppose I could change this to just sys-apps/openrc
>
> > # emerge --oneshot -av $(grep -l "#!/sbin/runscr
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 09:28:44PM +0200, Hans de Graaff wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 10:58 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > it looks like app-emulation/docker expects /etc/hostname to exist.
>
> Is there a bug for this? docker seems to work fine for me on a system
> without this fi
I thought about dropping the version number from the
display-if-installed line, but that doesn't make sense because it means
that everyone, including all new installs of OpenRC after this version,
would have to read the newsitem.
William
Title: OpenRC runscript transition
Author: William Hubbs
C
On 08/22/2016 05:45 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 09:53:48PM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>> On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, William Hubbs wrote:
>>
>>> Display-If-Installed: >
>> Why the condition on the version number?
>
> I suppose I could change this to just sys-apps/openrc
>
>
On 08/22/2016 03:09 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 09:28:44PM +0200, Hans de Graaff wrote:
>> On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 10:58 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> it looks like app-emulation/docker expects /etc/hostname to exist.
>>
>> Is there a bug for this? docker seems t
On Sunday, August 21, 2016 02:58:42 PM Pacho Ramos wrote:
> # Pacho Ramos (21 Aug 2016)
> # This was merged in systemd, if you want to keep it, take it a
> maintain it
> # splitted (#556734). Removal in a month.
> sys-boot/gummiboot
Why is this being tree-cleaned?
It still works and is likely to
systemd-boot is the new name. I think that it can be removed bacause the
dev line just moved into systemd suite.
Il giorno mar 23 ago 2016 alle ore 08:45 J. Roeleveld
ha scritto:
> On Sunday, August 21, 2016 02:58:42 PM Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > # Pacho Ramos (21 Aug 2016)
> > # This was merged in
37 matches
Mail list logo
